حقوق ناشی از تأخیر در پرداخت تعهدات پولی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته دکتری حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

2 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

بدون تردید پول ازجمله کاربردی‌ترین اختراع‌های اعتباری بشری است که بحث اهمیت آن نه ‌فقط در اقتصاد بلکه در حقوق نیز غیرقابل‌انکار است. هر زمان که مدیون در پرداخت تعهد پولی خود تأخیر کند سوال اصلی که در نظام‌های حقوقی مختلف از جمله نظام حقوقی ایران مطرح می‌شود این است که چه حقوقی برای متعهدله جهت جبران کامل خسارات ناشی از تاخیر در پرداخت قابل مطالبه است. برای پاسخ به این پرسش می‌توان میان سه حق مختلف برای طلبکار تفکیک قائل شد: اگر طرفین در مورد خسارت وارده توافق کرده باشند، خسارت موردتوافق باید پرداخت شود و درصورت عدم توافق، خسارت ناشی ازکاهش ارزش پول و منافع ازدست‌رفته پول (بهره) به‌لحاظ اقتصادی قابل مطالبه خواهد بود. این نوشتار درتلاش است تا با رویکردی توصیفی و تحلیلی هر کدام از این نوع خسارات را با درنظرگرفتن وضعیت موجود درنظام حقوقی و قضائی ایران بررسی ‌کند. یافته‌های این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که از میان حقوق مختلفی که به ‌لحاظ اقتصادی برای رسیدن به اصل جبران کامل خسارات ضروری است، نظام حقوقی ایران صرفاً کاهش ارزش پول را با شروط بسیاری پذیرفته و منافع ازدست‌رفته پول را به‌رسمیت نمی‌شناسد. در مورد امکان توافق اشخاص بر میزان خسارت نیز رویکرد بسیار مضیقی را اتخاذ کرده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Rights Arising from Late Payment of Monetary Obligations

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mona Abdi 1
  • Mahmoud Bagheri 2
1 Ph. D. in Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University
2 Associate Prof. of Faculty of Law & Political Sciences, Tehran University, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Undoubtedly, money stands as one of the most practical human credit inventions, playing a crucial role not only in economics but also in law. Among various obligations in transactions and lawsuits, monetary obligations hold a special position as they involve the payment of sums of money. Money's unique liquidity-providing role, ease of use, and acceptance by individuals set it apart from other goods. Today, money is not merely a means of exchange or a measure of value but is considered a valuable capital and asset in itself, capable of generating profits.
When a debtor fails to fulfill their monetary obligation on time, the creditor incurs losses due to the devaluation of money and the lost opportunity to utilize their funds profitably. Such compensation to the creditor is based on two principles: 1. Compensating the creditor for their lost opportunity, and 2. Preventing the debtor from unjust enrichment by utilizing the money without fulfilling their obligation. Consequently, late payment of monetary obligations gives rise to three distinct rights for the creditor: liquidated damages if agreed upon by the parties, damages resulting from money devaluation, and interest as compensation for the loss of use of money.
In the Iranian legal system, certain concepts like interest are not recognized as damages and cannot be compensated, leading to discrepancies between primary and secondary monetary obligations. To address this issue, this article 
delves into the three types of damages, providing a descriptive and analytical approach, and analyzes the Iranian legal situation and judicial practice.
The findings of this research highlight that while achieving the principle of full compensation requires recognizing various rights, the Iranian legal system only accepts the devaluation of money under strict conditions and does not acknowledge interest. The limited scope for individuals to agree on the amount of damages also hinders full compensation. However, given the modern economic landscape, accepting these rights becomes essential for achieving full compensation in monetary obligations.
As a solution, this article proposes amending Article 522 of the Civil Procedure Code to properly compensate for money devaluation. Additionally, based on the comparative findings of the opportunity cost criterion, a flexible approach is suggested to determine an appropriate interest rate for compensating the loss of use of money for the creditor, encompassing both subjective and objective criteria.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on the rights arising from late payment of monetary obligations through a thorough analysis of the Iranian legal and judicial system. To achieve the principle of full compensation, the recognition of devaluation of money and the acceptance of interest in certain cases seem indispensable.
One proposed solution is to introduce a more comprehensive article acknowledging and compensating for the devaluation of money based on the real rate of inflation in the market, announced by relevant institutions. This proposal aims to create a clearer and fairer framework for calculating damages related to money devaluation. By considering the real rate of inflation, the compensation for the creditor's loss can accurately reflect the economic realities.
Moreover, a reevaluation of the restrictions on individuals agreeing on the amount of damages is crucial. Allowing parties to agree on liquidated damages can enhance contractual autonomy and provide a more effective means of achieving full compensation. However, it is essential to establish appropriate limits and safeguards to prevent potential abuse.
Beyond the Iranian legal system, this study also considers the broader perspective of international practices in compensating for late payment damages. By examining the approaches taken by different legal systems, it becomes evident that flexible and adaptive solutions are crucial for addressing the intricacies of monetary obligations and late payment compensation.
Furthermore, the concept of interest as a means of compensating the loss of use of money should not be disregarded. Interest serves as an important tool to achieve the principle of full compensation and ensure fairness between parties in monetary obligations. While its recognition and implementation require careful consideration, embracing the economic realities of the modern world demands a more nuanced approach.
In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of the rights arising from late payment of monetary obligations is crucial to establish a just and efficient legal framework. Embracing the principles of full compensation, contractual autonomy, and economic realities can pave the way for meaningful reform. By reevaluating existing legal provisions and aligning them with international best practices, the Iranian legal system can better address the complexities of late payment damages and protect the rights of all parties involved.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Monetary Obligations
  • Devaluation
  • Interest
  • Late Payment Damages
  • Liquidated Damages
  • Loss of Profit

مراجع

Abdi, M. (2021). Uncertain Damages In The United States Legal System: Rethinking in Iranian Legal System, Entesharco, 1st edition, [in Persian].
Abedian, M. H. (2006). The Ability To Enforce Penal Clauses In Contracts, The Need to Revise Article 230 Iran Civil Code, Journal of Theology and Law, 8 (19), 3-43, [in Persian].
Alhouee Nazari, M. (2021). Delayed Payment Damages In Contractual And Non-contractual Liability System, Majdpub, Second edition, [in Persian].
Alhuee Nazari, M, Meghdadi, M. M. (2020). Damage of Inflation And Loss of Monetary Benefits in Late Payment Damages And Comparison To Common Law and French Law, Journal of Comparative Law, 17 (2), 181-206. [in Persian].
Alsharif, M. M, Ghaem Fard, S. M, Mansouri Tehrani, M. M. (2020). A Reflection On The Types of Late Payment Damages And The Possibility of Applying Them to Foreign Currency Debts, Private Law Journal, 17 (2), 351-371. [in Persian].
Arabi, S. H & Meysami, H. (2019). Money And Banking With An Islamic Approach, Vol: 1, Research Institute of The Houzeh and University, 3rd edition, [in Persian].
Babaei, I. (2018). Tort Law, Mizan Pub, Second Edition, [in Persian].
Bahrol-olum, A. (2009). Masabih-ol-osoul, Vol:3, Third edition, Dar-ol-Zahra pub, [in Arabic].
Carney, J. P & Felsen, D. (2020). Understanding The Purpose, Limitations, and Benefits of Liquidated Damages Clause, Associated Builder and Constructor.
Cooter, R & Ulan, T. (2013). Law and Economics, Translated by: Dr. Yaddollah Dadgar and Hamedeh Akhavan, Publications of Tarbiat Modares University Economics Research Institute And Noor Elam Publications, 6th edition, [in Persian].
Dadgar, Y. (2012). Principles of Economic Analysis: Micro & Macro, Amareh Press, [in Persian].
 European Economic & Marketing Consultants. (2014). Compensation For Loss of Profit, Competition Competence Report, Autumn., first edition, [in Persian].
Ghaninejad, M, (1997), The Difference between Usury and Bank Interest, Naqd Va Nazar Magazine, 3 (12), 314-327, [in Persian].
Gharavi Esfahani, M. H. (1995). Nahayat ol-derayat fi Sharhe Kefayat, Second Volume, Iran: Qom, [in Arabic].
Gronow, J. (2020). What Is Money: The Function of Money, Printed in Deciphering Markets and Money, Helsinki University of Press.
Hajian, H., Sar Khosh, J., Akbari Dehnu, M. (2020). The Cause of Conflict in Opinions of The Guardian Council Regarding The Late Payment Damages, Quarterly Journal of Public Law Knowledge, 9 (27), 1-28, [in Persian].
Hicks, J. )1967). Critical Essays In Monetary Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ibbetson, D. J. (2001). A Historical Introduction to The Law of Obligations, first published in Paperback, Oxford University Press.
Ingham, G. (2004). The Nature of Money, First edition, Polity Press Ltd.
Ingham, G. (2000). Babylonian Madness: On The Historical and Sociological Origins of Money, printed in What is Money, London: Routledge.
Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2003). Elementology of Legal Encyclopedia, first edition, Gang Danesh pub, [in Persian].
Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2002). Extensive In Legal Terminology, Vol: 3, Second edition, Tehran, Ganj Danesh pub, [in Persian].
Karimi, A., Bahrampour, R. (2020). A Comparative Study of The Nature of The Guarantee Due to The Delay in The Implementation of Monetary Obligations In The Laws of Iran and France, Comparative Law Research Quarterly, 24 (3), 127-150, [in Persian].
Katouzian, N. (2011). General Principles of Contract (Performance of Contract), 4th volume, Entesharco, 6th edition, [in Persian].
Keir, J. & Keir, R. (1983). Opportunity Cost: A Measure of Prejudgment Interest, The Business Lawyer, 39 (1), 129-152.
Khoei, A. (1992). Mesbah-ol-osoul, vol: 1, Qom: Maktabatol Davari pub, [in Arabic].
Knoll, M. S. & Colon, J. M. (2005). The Calculation of Prejudgment Interest, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Working Paper, No. 06-21, 1-35.
Laws, J. (2018). The Time Value of Money the Dividend Discount Model and Dividend Policy, Printed in Essential Financial Management, Liverpool University Press.
Mellor, M. (2010). What Is Money?, Printed in The Future Money, Pluto Press.
Mesbahi Moghadam, Gh., & Seyed Hosseinzadeh, M. (2013). The Effect of The Nature of Capital In Determining The Forbidding and Permissibility of Money Interest, Islamic Economics Quarterly, 13 (50), 59-77, [in Persian].
Mirmoezzi, S. H. (2003). Money Demanding In Islamic Economy, Islamic Economics Quarterly, 3 (10), 83-102, [in Persian].
Mirshekari, A. (2020). Practical Treatise On Civil Responsibility, Entesharco, 3rdedition, [in Persian].
Mishkin, F. (2015). The Economics of Money, Banking And Financial Markets, Boston: Pearson Higher Ed, 11th edition.
Mohaghegh Damad, M., Rezaenejad, H. (2019). Delay In Satisfaction of Monetary Obligations And Its Consequences (Statute Law Analysis And Jurisprudence Case Law Review), Private Law Research Quarterly, 7 (26), 271-300, [in Persian].
Mohaghegh Helli. (1988). Sharaye-ol-Islam, Tehran: Esteghlal pub, 2nd Edition, [in Arabic].
Mohseni, S. (2010). The Position of Late Payment Damages In Commercial Bills, The Judiciary Law Journal, 74(69), 95-116, [in Persian].
Najafi, M. H. (1845). Javaher-ol-Kalam, vol: 37, Beyroot pub, 7th edition, [in Arabic].
Pierson, G. )1972). The Role of Money In Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 86 (3), 383-395.
Rostami, M. Z. (2011). Conceptual Challenges of Usury, Interest And Equilibrium Interest (The Way The Holy Quran Deals With Economic Corruption), Quarterly Journal of Islamic Economics, 41, 189-214, [in Persian].
Sadat Hosseini, S. H. (2017). The Scope of The Validity of The Liquidated Damages In Terms of The Amount In Monetary Obligations, Journal of Studies of Islamic Jurisprudence And Law, 17, 157-182, [in Persian].
Safaei, H. (2008). General Principles of Contracts, 6th Edition, Tehran, Mizan pub, [in Persian].
Senechal, T. J. & Gotanda, J. Y. (2009). Interest as Damages, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47 (3), 491-536.
Shams, A. (2008). Civil Procedure, Vol: 2, Tehran: Derak pub, 16th edition, [in Persian].
Shahidi, M. (2007). The Effects of Contracts And Obligations, Vol: 3, 3rd edition, Majd pub, [in Persian].
Sik Kim, Y. & Shantian, Y. (2001). Liquidity, Quality and Production Cost and Welfare In A Search Model of Money, The Economic Journal, 111 (468), 114-127.
Shiravi, A. H. (2001). Criticism And Review of The Provisions of The Civil Procedure Code Regarding Contractual Damages And Late Payment, Journals of Mojtamae AAlie Ghom, 3, 7-50, [in Persian].
Tabaei Nezhad, M. (2017). Case Law Regarding Municipal Claims, Shahr pub, First edition, [in Persian].
Tafaghodi Zare, S. (2016). Devaluation of Money In Iranian and British Law, Journal of International Legal Research, 9 (3), 1-24, [in Persian].
Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, (1979), Report of the Secretary-General: Liquidated Damages and Penalty Clauses, Volume X, (A/CN.9/191), 25 April.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار