نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان
2 گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
3 دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Despite the humanistic evolution of international law in the second half of the twentieth century, the survival of the "state" is the main basis of the fundamental core of the rules of classic international law. But if a state is faced with a credible threat to its existence and being, to what extent does international law allow it to use this situation as a pretext for deviating from the conventional rules of international law, and does such a threat, as a “State of Exception”, allow international law to continue to operate as normal conditions, or does a special legal regime govern the situation? The answers to these questions are important because Israel justified its attacks on Iran in June 2025 on this basis and invited the United States to the battlefield. The research hypothesis, which is proven by a descriptive-analytical method, is that the Israeli approach is influenced by the Schmittian views of international law, which considers war to be a political rather than a normative/moral matter, and recognizes the right to use of force, especially in light of the perception of an existential threat to any state. However, international law after the UN Charter is the exact opposite of this approach and has limited the use of force to "self-defense". However, the International Court of Justice has left room of claiming the possibility of violating some rules, including the use of nuclear weapons.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)