نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانش آموخته دکترای فقه و حقوق ، دانشگاه شهید مطهری ، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The twelve-day war of summer 2025 between Iran and Israel, a watershed moment in the history of modern conflicts, showcased the inadequacy of traditional international law frameworks in the face of hybrid warfare. Through a descriptive-analytical approach and based on a documented case study, this research answers the central question of what Iran's legal-political strategy was during this conflict and what implications this strategy holds for the future of international law and security. The findings reveal that Iran's strategy was not a new interpretation of "preventive defense," but rather an innovative doctrine of "asymmetric and hybrid response" to Israel's initial physical attack. This doctrine is characterized by three key features: shifting the theater of conflict from the physical to the cyber domain; the intelligent use of proxy actors to operate in the gray zone and create ambiguity in the attribution of responsibility; and the targeting of critical infrastructure to paralyze the adversary's socio-economic functions. This paper argues that this approach, while challenging the classic concepts of jus ad bellum (the law on the use of force) and jus in bello (international humanitarian law), exposed the inefficiency of collective security institutions. Ultimately, emphasizing the urgent need to adapt international law to new realities, the research presents specific strategic proposals, including the drafting of a "Digital Additional Protocol" to the Geneva Conventions to protect critical civilian infrastructure.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)