نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق، واحد خمینی شهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمینی شهر، ایران
2 گروه حقوق، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The ICSID Convention is widely regarded as the cornerstone of international investment law. While the Convention establishes the necessary conditions for invoking ICSID arbitration in international investment disputes, ICSID tribunals have consistently declined jurisdiction in cases involving abuse of process. Such abuse, which contravenes the international principle of good faith, often manifests in actions like corporate restructuring, referring to several reasons, the ICSID arbitration tribunals have refused to accept their jurisdiction to deal with these claims. This study addresses the critical question of how ICSID tribunals, under the ICSID Convention, have rejected claims based on abuse of process, particularly those involving corporate restructuring, Employing a library-based research methodology and utilizing analytical tools, the authors examine the reasoning and precedents set by ICSID tribunals. The analysis reveals that, in alignment with the principle of good faith and the doctrine prohibiting the abuse of rights, ICSID tribunals have rigorously interpreted the jurisdictional requirements under Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. In cases where "abuse of process" is established, tribunals have consistently refused to accept jurisdiction, thereby safeguarding the integrity of the arbitration process.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)