ضوابط تشخیص مقتضای ذات عقد در حقوق ایران و فقه امامیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی و اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه الهیات، دانشگاه یاسوج، یاسوج، ایران.

10.22099/jls.2025.47843.4984

چکیده

مقتضای ذات عقد عبارت است از اثری که مقصود اصلی از انعقاد عقد است که مستقیماً از ذات عقد ناشی می­شود. در اهمیت تشخیص مقتضای ذات عقد همین بس که هر شرط خلاف مقتضای عقد، به جهت تناقض با اثر اصلی عقد، مبطل عقد است. اکنون مسئله آن است که بر اساس چه معیاری می­توان مقتضای ذات عقد را تعیین کرد؟ در این پژوهش که بر اساس روش توصیفی_تحلیلی نگارش یافته است نگارنده کوشیده ­است تا معیارهایی را که منجر به کشف مقتضای عقد می­شود تبیین کند و ضابطه صحیح­تر را بیابد. این معیارها شامل مواردی مانند جعل شارع، عرف، تأثیر توأم عرف و شرع و قانون می‌شود که فرضیه این است که قانون تأثیر بیشتری داشته ­باشد. پس از بررسی ضوابط فوق، نتیجه حاصله آن است که نظر به اینکه تعاریفی که قانون‌گذار از ماهیت عقود به عمل آورده برای این واژگان حقیقت قانونی به وجود آورده­است، مهم‌ترین مأخذ برای تشخیص مقتضای عقد، قانون است. پس از قانون مهم‌ترین معیار، عرف است، زیرا برای کشف مقتضای عقد باید به بستر شکل­گیری عقد رجوع کرد. دیدگاه‌های فقهی نیز در شناخت مقصود قانون‌گذار و عرف بسیار مؤثر است، زیرا منبع اصلی قانون مدنی هستند و ماهیت عرفی عقود در این دیدگاه‌ها تبلور یافته ­است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Criteria for Recognizing the Requirements of the Substance of Contract in Iranian Law and Imamiyyah Jurisprudence

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohsen esmaeili 1
  • Mohammad Mansouri 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Department of Theology, Yasouj University
چکیده [English]

In order to engage in social life, individuals need to enter into agreements and contracts with others. The motivating factor for entering into a contract is the anticipated effects of that contract. Some of these effects are inherent to the essence and nature of the contract, rendering the contract useless without them. These effects, which constitute the purpose of creating contracts and are directly generated by the contract's essence, are known as the "requirements of the substance of contract." A condition contrary to the requirements of the substance of contract is one that contradicts the primary effect of the contract, leading to its invalidity.
The crucial question is: Based on what criteria can the requirements of the substance of contract be determined? Recognizing these requirements is of paramount importance, as any condition contrary to them renders the contract null and void. In some instances, the lack of precise rules for determining these requirements has led to differing interpretations among jurists. Some consider a particular condition to be against the requirements 
of the substance of contract, while others view it as contrary to Sharia or law, and still others deem the same condition to be valid. These divergent opinions create confusion for contracting parties when determining the terms of the contract. The most fundamental step in recognizing a condition contrary to the requirements of the substance of contract is to first identify those requirements.
This research, conducted using a descriptive-analytical method, aims to comprehensively explain the criteria that lead to the discovery of the requirements of the substance of contract, examine the strengths and weaknesses of each criterion, and ultimately select the most preferred criterion. These criteria include:

Sharia Law:Some jurists believe that the way to recognize the requirements of the substance of contract is through Sharia law, and that contradicting these requirements implies the cancellation of the effect that Sharia has determined for the nature of the contract. This viewpoint is not entirely acceptable because contracts are often signatory, and the Holy Sharia has approved them with amendments and limitations. Therefore, to understand the fundamentals and effects of contracts, one must refer to a framework where these issues have been more thoroughly developed.
Custom:One of the most significant criteria for determining the requirements of the substance of contract is custom. To discover these requirements, one must delve into the context in which the contract evolved, namely, the community. The community's understanding has crystallized in the form of custom. However, the profound impact of law on the legal system and the diminishing role of customs in defining the nature of contracts have reduced the importance of this criterion.
Law:Due to the fact that the legislator's definitions of contracts have established legal truth for these terms, the most crucial criterion for distinguishing the nature of a contract today is law. A potential issue with centering law in determining the requirements of the substance of contract is that the legislator's statements regarding these requirements are not always comprehensive. This can hinder the process, as in many cases, the nature, validity conditions, and rules of the contract are stated together. Additionally, sometimes the requirements of the substance and the absoluteness of the contract are stated together, making it difficult to distinguish the requirements of the substance of contract from other subjects.

Based on the above, law and custom are two major criteria in determining the requirements of the substance of contract. While contracts are formed within the context of society and custom is the most important criterion for identifying their nature, the establishment of law and the definition of the nature of each contract create legal truth for that contract. That contract then becomes meaningful only within that defined nature, and definitions outside of it fall outside the contract's nature.
However, due to the limitations of law in distinguishing some of the requirements of the contract and many conditions contrary to these requirements, and considering that contracts are formed within society to fulfill societal goals, custom should be considered as a criterion for determining the requirements of the substance of contract after law. The opinions of jurists (experts of Muslim law) in jurisprudential books, as experts who possess knowledge of Sharia, custom, and vocabulary, and the fact that the definitions of the nature of contracts in Iran's Civil Law are often derived from jurisprudential sources, serve as the best source reflecting both custom and Sharia considerations. These sources, being the root and primary source of civil law, significantly aid in understanding the nature of contracts and, consequently, the requirements of the substance of contract.
Therefore, in summary, the most important sources for understanding the requirements of the substance of contract are first law and then custom. Jurisprudential sources and the views of jurists can be highly effective in understanding the legislator's intent and custom.
Innominate Contracts:
Regarding innominate contracts, they should be divided into common and uncommon categories. For common innominate contracts prevalent in society, considering that customs exist regarding them, one should refer to custom to determine their requirements of the substance of contract, as explained earlier in the case of specific contracts. However, for uncommon innominate contracts that are not prevalent in society, there is no way to determine the nature of the contract except by referring to the intention of the contracting parties.
 
Characteristics of the Requirements of the Substance of Contract:
To determine the requirements of the substance of contract based on the mentioned criteria, it is essential to first understand the characteristics of these requirements.
Firstly, the requirements of the substance of contract are effects that originate from the essence and nature of the contract. Therefore, they are effects, not causes.
Secondly, since the requirements of the substance of contract are derived from the essence and nature of the contract, they do not encompass the conditions and rules of the contract that lie outside the contract's nature. Consequently, to determine the requirements of the substance of contract, one must distinguish between the conditions and rules of the contract and its substantive effects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Requirements of the Substance of Contract
  • Sharia Law
  • Legal Truth
  • Custom
  • Elements Identification

مراجع

Holy Quran
Alidoust, A. (2006). Jurisprudence and Custom, Tehran:
Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
Allama Helli, H. (1992). Qawa'id al-Ahkam fi Ma'rifat al-Halal wa l-Haram, V2, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom. [In Arabic]  
Allama Helli, H. (1993). Tadhkirat al-Fuqaha', V10, Qom,  Aal al-Bayt Peace Be upon Them  Institute.[In Arabic]  
Amili, S. (1998). Miftah al-Karama Fi Sharh Qawa'id al-Ahkam by al-'Allama al-Hilli, V14, 1th Edition, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom.[In Arabic]  
Ammani, H. (1992). The life of Ibn Abi Aqil and his jurisprudence, Qom: Jurisprudence Dictionary Center. [In Arabic]  
Ansari, M. (1994). Kitab al-Makasib, V3&6, Qom: Universal Congress for Reverence Great Shaykh Ansari. [In Arabic]
 Bahrani, H. (‌N.D). Al-Anwar al-lavam'i' Fi Sharh Mafatih al-Shara'I' ,V13, Qom: Magma' Al-bohous Al -'Ilmiyya.[In Arabic]  
Bahrani, Y. (1984). Al- Hada'iq al-Nadirah Fi Ahkam al-'Itrah al-Tahirah, V19, 1th Edition, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom. [In Arabic]  
Borujerdi, M. (2001) Civil Law, Qazvin: Taha Publication. [In Persian]
Halabi, A. (N.D). Al- Kafi fi al-Feqh, Isfahan:  Imam Amir al-Mo'menin Peace Be upon Him Library. [In Arabic]   
Hasani, H. (ND). Nazariyyat al_Aqd fi al-Fiqh Ja'fari, Beirout: Maktabat Hashem publication. [In Arabic]  
Ḥelli, J. (1987). Shara'i' al-Islam Fi Masa'il al-Halal Wa al-Haram ,V 2, Qom, Ismaelian Institute.[In Arabic] 
Imam Khomeini, S. (2000). Kitab al-Bay',(Sale Book), V5, Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works.[In Arabic]
 Imam Khomeini, S. (ND). Tahrir al-Wasila , V1, Qom: Daar al-Ilm Institute.[In Arabic] 
Imami khansaari, M. (ND). Hashiyyat al-Saniyyah ala al-Makasib.[In Arabic] 
Imami, S. (ND). Civil Law, V1, Tehran: Islamiyyah Publication.[In Persian]
Irvani, A. (‌1985). Commentary on al-Makasib, V2, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. [In Arabic] 
Isfahani, M. (1997). Commentary on Kitab al-Makasib, V5, Qom: Anwar al-Hoda Publication.[In Arabic] 
Ja'fari Langrodi, M. (1993). Dictionary Terms of Law, V 2,Tehran: Ganjedanesh Publications.[In Persian]
Ja'fari Langrodi, M. (1999). Mabsoot Dictionary Terms of Law, V2, Tehran: Ganjedanesh Publications. [In Persian]
Ja'fari Langrodi, M. (2001). Philosophy OF Civil Law,V1 Tehran: Ganjedanesh Publications. [In Persian]
Ja'fari Langrodi, M. (2003). Law Elements Dictionary, Tehran: Ganjedanesh Publications. [In Persian]
Karaki, A. (1993). Jamiʿ al-Maqāṣid fi Sharh al-Qawaʿid, V4, Qom: Aal al-Bayt Peace Be upon Them Institute. [In Arabic] 
Kashif al-Ghitaʾ, M. (1940). Tahrir al-Majalla, V2 Part. 2, Najaf: Al-maktabat al-Mortazaviyya. [In Arabic] 
Katouzian, N. (2004). General Principles of Contracts, V3,Tehran, Ganj Danesh Library.[In Persian]
Katouzian, N. (2008). Civil law in the Current Legal Order, Tehran: Mizan Publications. [In Persian]
Khoei,  S. (N.D). Misbah al-Fiqaha, V7. [In Arabic] 
Khomeini, S. (1997).  Al_Khiarat ,Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Arabic]
Makarim Shirazi, N. (2004). Anwar al-Fiqaha_ Kitab al-Bay'(Sale Book), Qom: Publication of Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib Seminary. [In Arabic] 
Makarim Shirazi, N. (2006). Encyclopedia of Comparative Jurisprudence, Qom: Publication of Imam Ali Ibn Abi Talib Seminary. [In Arabic] 
Mansouri, M., Alsharif, M., & Tabatabaei, S. (2024). Criteria for Qualification of the Contract Based on Analysis of the agreement of Contracting Parties in Iranian Law, Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and French law. Journal of Comparative Law, doi: 10.22080/lps.2023.25647.1530
Maraghi, M. (1996). Al Anavin Al Feqhiah. V2, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyyah Qom. [In Arabic] 
Mirza Qomi, A. (2006). Rasaeil  al-Mirza-ye Qomi, V 2, Qom: Islamic Explanation Office - Khorasan branch.[In Arabic] 
Mohammadi, A. (2011). Principles for Interference of Islamic Law, Tehran: Tehran University Publication. [In Persian]
Mousawi Bojnourdi, S. (1998) al- Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah, V3, Qom: Al-Hadi Publication. [In Arabic] 
Mousawi Khoei,S. (1993). Al_Shurut 'aw al_Iailtizamat al_Tabaeiat fi al_Euqud,V1, Beirout: Dar al_Muarikh al_Arabi. [In Arabic] 
Naeini, M. (1953). Munyat al-Talib Fi Hashiyat al-Makasib (Commentary on al-Makasib), V2, Tehran: Muhammadiyya Bookstore. [In Arabic] 
Naeini, M. (1992). Al-Makasib Wa al-Bay', V2, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom.[In Arabic]
  Najafi Ghilani, H. (1893). Kitab al-Ijarah( Rent book).[In Arabic] 
Najafi, M. (1983). Jawahir al-Kalam FI Sharḥ sharāʾiʿ al-Islam ,V23, Beirut: Daar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.[In Arabic] 
Naraqi, A. (1996). Awaed al-Ayyam fi Bayan Qawaeid al-Ahkam, Qom: Qom Seminary Islamic Explanation Office Publications. [In Arabic]   
Naraqi, A. (2001). Rasaeil wa Masaeil, V1, Qom: Naraqiein Congress Mulla Mahdi & Mulla Ahmad.[In Arabic] 
Naraqi, M. (2002). Mashariq al-Ahkam, Qom: Naraqiein Congress Mulla Mahdi & Mulla Ahmad.[In Arabic] 
Sabziwari, M. (2002). Kifayat al-Ahkam, V1, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom.[In Arabic] 
Sanhuri, A. (2012). Nazariyyat al_Aqhd, V2,Tehran: KhorsandiPublication.[In Arabic] 
Seywari Helli, M. (1983). Al-Tanqih al-Rae le-Mokhtasar al-sharae', V3, Qom: Publication of Ayatollah Mar'ashi Najafi Library.[In Arabic]  
Seywari Hilli, M. (ND). Nazd al- Qawa'id al-Feqhiyyat ala Mazhab al_Imamiyyat, Qom: Publication of Ayatollah Mar'ashi Najafi Library.[In Arabic] 
Shahid Awwal, M. (1989). Al-Lum'a al-Dimashqiyya fi Fiqh al'Iimamia, Beirut: Dar al_Turath – al_Daar al_Islamiat.[In Arabic]  
Shahid Awwal, M. (1996). Al-Durus al-Shari'a Fi Fiqh al-Imdmiya, V3, Qom: Islamic Publication of Theological Lecturers Association of Hawza 'Ilmiyya Qom.[In Arabic] 
Shahid Awwal, M. (ND). AlQawaeid wa al_Fawayid, Mofid Bookstore.[In Arabic] 
Shahid Thani, Z. (1992). Masalik al-Afham Fi Sharh Shara'i' al-Islam, V 4, Qom: Ma‘arif Islami Institute.[In Arabic] 
Shahidi, M. (2000). Civil Law ,V4, Stipulations Stipulated in the Contract, Tehran: Majd publication.[In Persian]
Shirazi, S. (ND). Iisal al_Taalib Iilaa al_Makasib, V14, Tehran: Aalami publications.[In Arabic] 
Sistani, S. (1996). Minhaj al-Salehin, V2, Qom: Office of Hazrat Ayatollah Sistani. [In Arabic] 
Sobhani, J. (2002). Dirasat Mujazat fi al-Khiarat wa al-Shurut ,Qom: al-Markaz al_alami li-Dirasat al_islamia.[In Arabic] 
Sobhani, J. (1993). al_Mukhtar fi Ahkam al_khiar ,Qom: Imam al-sadiq peace be upon him Institute.[In Arabic]   
Sobhani, J. (2003). Al-Mawahib fi Tahrir 'Ahkam al-Makasib,Qom: Imam al-sadiq peace be upon him Institute.[In Arabic]   
Tabaṭabaei Yazdi, S. (2000). Commentary on al-Makasib, V1, Qom: Ismaelian Institute. [In Arabic]      
Tabrizi, J. (1995). 'Iirshad al_Taalib 'iilaa al_Taeliq alaa al_Makasib, V1, Qom : Ismailian Institute.[In Arabic] 
Tusi, M. (1967). Al-Mabsut Fi Fiqh al-Imamiyya, V2, Tehran: Al-maktabat al_ Mortazaviyya le-Ehya Athar al- Ja'faryya.[In Arabic] 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار