مطالعه تطبیقی محدودیت‌های استفاده از زور توسط ماموران اجرای قانون

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا و جرم‌شناسی، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه حقوق دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

10.22099/jls.2024.48479.5021

چکیده

حق بر امنیت و آسایش شهروندان ازجمله حقوق بنیادین بشر و تضمین آن، کارویژه اصلی دولت‌هاست. تأمین و تضمین این حق، به مدد مشروعیت و اقتدار قانونی و جلب رضایت و مشارکت شهروندان در خلق و حفظ نظم و امنیت در یک ساختار مردم‌سالار میسر می‌شود. یکی از ابزارهای تحت اختیار دولت برای تضمین نظم و امنیت، مأموران اجرای قانون هستند. از سوی دیگر، تضمین آزادی و حفظ کرامت شهروندان حق بنیادین دیگری است که ممکن است به بهانه تأمین امنیت، توسط مأموران نادیده انگاشته شده و یا با محدودیت ناموجه روبرو شود. در این مطالعه به روش تحلیلی- توصیفی، در پاسخ به این پرسش که اعمال زور توسط مأمورین اجرای قانون با چه محدودیت­هایی مواجه است؟ با استناد به قواعد عامی که اکثریت کشورها و اسناد حقوق بشری مدنظر قرار داده­اند، محدوده اعمال زور در موقعیت­های مختلف و امکان به‌کارگیری زور در آن موارد بررسی شد. یافته­های تحقیق حاکی از این است که در قوانین و رویه­های مورد عمل توسط مأموران اجرای قانون در ایران در مواردی استاندارهای موجود به‌خصوص در حفظ جان افراد بی‌گناه یا متهمان موردتوجه نیست و اصلاح قانون به‌کارگیری سلاح از این منظر نیازمند اصلاح و بازنگری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparative Study of Limits on the Use of Force by Law Enforcement Officers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Azar Rezagholi 1
  • Hossein Aghababaei 2
  • Mojtaba Janipour 3
1 University of Guilan, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Department of Law
2 Associate Professor. Law Department, Faculty of Literature & Human Science, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Law Department, Faculty of Literature & Human Science, University of Guilan. Rasht, Iran
چکیده [English]

Governments employ various tools and programs to address crime and insecurity within society. Law enforcement officers are typically responsible for implementing these programs, and are granted corresponding tools and powers. Without these powers, it would be impossible to fulfill their duties and achieve the primary goal of establishing order and security. However, a crucial concern in maintaining order and security is protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens. Law enforcement officers must not violate these rights under the pretext of preserving order. Therefore, this research aims to comparatively examine the restrictions on the use of force by law enforcement officers and outline the minimum standards that ensure both citizen safety and freedom.
The most important international legal documents in this regard are the "Basic Principles of the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials" adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention in 1990 and the "Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials" approved in 1979. Adherence to these documents, as well as domestic regulations of countries with strong citizen rights protections, can contribute to unifying the rules governing the use of force by law enforcement officers worldwide. In Iranian law, the most significant legislation related to this issue is the "Law on the Use of Weapons by the Law Enforcement Officers of the Armed Forces in Necessary Cases." This law has been analyzed to assess its compliance with the aforementioned international documents. It is important to note that "law enforcement officers" in this context do not refer solely to those responsible for maintaining order and security in a literal sense. This term is used in the aforementioned documents and laws of some countries, such as the United States, to include officers who are specifically tasked with law enforcement. Moreover, the use of force in this research encompasses not only physical force, weapons, and physical contact but also non-material force, such as insulting or humiliating behavior.
This research, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology, seeks to answer the question of when and to what extent the use of force by law enforcement officers is permissible. In other words, what are the acceptable limits of force in various situations to ensure both order and security while safeguarding the rights and well-being of accused persons, criminals, and other citizens? To achieve this goal, the limitations faced by law enforcement officers should be categorized into relative and absolute. Relative limitations allow for the use of force under certain conditions, such as saving their own lives or the lives of citizens, provided that the force used is proportionate. In contrast, absolute restrictions prohibit the use of force in certain cases, such as torture of accused persons or crowded educational and therapeutic facilities, due to the reasons discussed in this research.
The research findings indicate that Iranian regulations grant law enforcement officers broad powers to establish security, as outlined in ten clauses of the "Law on the Use of Weapons." However, a significant concern is that the law equates these broad cases with the preservation of human life. Therefore, this research suggests the need to amend existing laws, particularly the "Law on the Use of Weapons," to align them more closely with the basic principles of the United Nations regarding the use of force. The use of weapons and force should be determined on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances involved. The general rule should prioritize saving the lives of the officer and other citizens. Furthermore, the research highlights that the use of force, whether material or non-material, can cause harm to accused persons and criminals. While material force can result in physical injury or loss of life, non-material force, such as humiliation, can inflict psychological harm. Therefore, it is essential for relevant institutions, particularly prosecutors' offices, to monitor the behavior of law enforcement officers to ensure the dignity of accused persons and criminals. Any violations should be clearly addressed through legal punishment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • law enforcement officers
  • use of force
  • use of weapons
  • rights of prisoners
  • freedom of assembly

مراجع

Abadi,  S. R.,  &  Rahimi Moghadam, S. H. (2014). Consideration of The Legal System of  "Right to Strike" In The United States of America And The Laws of The Islamic Republic of Iran. Basic Rights, 10(20), 1-30.]In Persian[
Abdollahi, A., Rezagholi, A. & Nariman, N. (2023). Compensation of the guilty victim in the assumption of duty by the officers, Criminal Law Research, 14(1), 171- 195. ]In Persian[.
Afrasiabi, A. (2015). Legal Authorities of Police Use of Firearms (Comparative Study of Criminal Policy of Iran and Britain, Criminal law doctrines, 9 (12), 199 -231.  ]In Persian[.
Aghababaei, H. (2010). The Scope of Security in Criminal Law, Publisher:  IICT Publishing House. ]In Persian[.
Aghababaei, H. (2023). The Right to peaceful assembly in public from the perspective of Islamic Sharia and Iranian law, The Journal of Human Rights,18(1), 87ـ 110. ]In Persian[.
Arnold, R., & MartinezـEstay, J, I. (2017). Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power: Some Reflections from National and International Law, Publisher: Springer.
Baghaei, M .& Malmir, M. & Haidari, M. (2020). Fundamental rights of prisons in European transnational Instruments, Journal Private and Criminal Law Research, 45 (16), 145-171. ]In Persian[.
Bernard, B. (2005). Criminology, translation: Njafi Abrand Abadi, Ali Hossein, (2005), print: 2, Tehran.  ]In Persian[.
Boyle, M., & Vullierme, J, C. (2021). A brief introduction to policing public gatherings A guide for practitioners, Printed at the Council of Europe.
Brown, J.  & Mead, D. (2021). Police powers: protest, Briefing paper, House of Commons Library, Number 5013.
Brandon, G., & Christopher, S. (2020). The Law on Police Use of Force in the United States, German Law Journal, 21, 1526 – 1540.
Chwastiak, M. (2015). Torture as normal work: the Bush Administration the Central Intelligence Agency and Enhanced Interrogation Techniques, Journals Permissions, (22) 4, 493-511.
Eslami, R., & Kamalvand, M. M. (2014). The challenges of freedom of assembly in Iranian legal system in light of the international human rights standards, Journal International law, 50, 187-222.
Gholami Razini, M. & Soltani, M. & Gholami, E. (2017). Review the legal challenges and gaps in the use of firearms by border guards, Journal Frontier Studies, 5(4), pp.1-28. ]In Persian[.
Goodstein, L. & Layton, M. (1989). The American Prison Issues Research and Policy, publisher: Springer US.
Gottschalk, M.  (2015).  Caught The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
Independence Commission, (2017). Caribbean Human Rights and Use of Force, Jamaica.
Karimi Khozani, A. & Ghafari Gholam R. & Aziz Abadi, F. (2018). Ethics challenges and strategies of police toward demonstration and street protests, Journal Ethics in Science and Technology, 13 (1), 9-17. ]In Persian[.
Kuester, L. (2021). Violence in Pursuit of Health Living with HIV in the American Prison System, Palgrave studies in prisons and penology, Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK.
Maguire, E.  & Oakley, M. (2020). Policing Protests, Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation (HFG).
Mahmoudi Janaki, F. & Roustaie, M. (2013). Justification of Criminal Intervention; Principles and Necessities, Journal of Criminal Law Research,1(3), 35-66.
Mann, Ph. & Iscoe,  I.  (1971). Reflections on a peaceful demonstration, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas Scholar Works, University of Texas Libraries.
Michaelsen, C. (2006). Balancing Civil Liberties against National Security? A Critique of Counterterrorism Rhetoric, University of New South Wales Law Journal, (29),1- 21.
Moreland, R. (1955). Some Trends in the Law of Arrest,  Minnesota Law Review, 39, 479- 492.
Murdoch, J. & Roche, R. (2013). The European Convention on Human Rights and Policing (a handbook for police officers and other law enforcement officials), Council of Europe Publishing.
Neil, J., &  Hamilton, M. (2009). Protecting Peaceful Protest: The OSCE/ODIHR and Freedom of Peaceful Assembly”, Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1(2), pp.  208- 235.
Parvizi Fard, A. (2012). Arresting suspect without warrant by police: a comparative study in Iran and Englands law, Journal Private law, 42 (2), pp. 75-91. ]In Persian[.
Pfiffner, James P. (2008). Power Play: the Bush presidency and the Constitution. Washington, DC, USA, Brooking Institution Press.
Resenfeld, M. & Sajo, A. (2012). The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law, Oxford: Oxford university press.
Skoll, Geoffrey, R.  (2008). Torture and the Fifth Amendment, Torture, the Global War on Terror, and Constitutional Values, Criminal Justice Review Journal, (33) 1, pp. 29-47.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2017). Resource book on the use of force and firearms in law enforcement (Criminal Justice Handbook Series), United Nations Human Rights Office of the Height Commissioner.
White, G. & Alejandra, Natalia, E. C. (2021). Use of Police Force: A Framework to Ensure Good Governance Over the use of force, Geneva Centre for Security Sector Governance, Geneva.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار