نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، واحد چالوس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، چالوس، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق جزا و جرم‌‌شناسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Holding a public trial appropriately way requires respect for the judge's dignity, security for all the people involved in the trial process, and generally order and peace in the courtroom are seen as the mechanisms of a proper trial. Based on this, attending public court hearings, like many other places, requires its own culture, and the obvious disregard of the people present in the hearing to the basic standards of appropriate behavior cannot and should not be tolerated. The purpose of this research is to untangle the nature and scope of the disruption in the order of public court sessions and the mechanisms related to ensuring the order of these sessions in the Iranian criminal system, and also identify the approach of international standards regarding this issue. The findings of this research, which was carried out in a descriptive-analytical way, show that in iranian criminal system, The issue of disrupting the order of public court hearings is recognized as a violation that under no circumstances can be a justification for holding a trial in private by the court, Rather, The judge is obliged to establish order in an appropriate manner. This is despite the fact that in the international system of human rights, deviation from the principle of public trial in some cases may be placed under the title of "interests of justice" due to ensuring the order and security of the court session, And be possible by relying on the elements of necessity and appropriateness.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)