نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
3 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی /دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
4 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Electronic consumer contracts can lead to disputes and ambiguities. One of them is the arguments between parties as to which court is competent in consumer v. trader? In the absence of any uniform international rules, it is necessary to take account legal systems’ approaches to extraterritorial jurisdiction in these disputes. The essay with descriptive-analytical and comparative approach shows in filling a lawsuit by the consumer v. trader, the EU legislator considering the consumer is the weak party economically and using electronic means, has established some rules for jurisdiction. These rules assist the consumer to bring the claim easier and with less expenses. In this way, the EU law has not paid attention to the place of “conclusion of contract” and “performance of obligation”. In Iran, there are no special rules of jurisdiction in consumer v. trader disputes in e-contracts. Also, the reference to the rule contained in Art. 11 Iranian Civil Procedure Code for bring the claim in Iranian courts isn’t effective in most cases for the consumer domiciled in Iran. The court may render a judgment can’t be enforced in Iran. So, it is necessary Iranian lawmaker considering world evolution establishes special rules for extraterritorial jurisdiction in these disputes.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)