تأملی بر امکان‌سنجی تعقیب داخلی و بین‌المللی جنایات ارتکابی رژیم صهیونیستی در غزه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

جنایات بین‌المللی ارتکابی رژیم صهیونیستی در غزه، به‌ویژه از 7 اکتبر 2023 تاکنون بی‌تردید مستوجب تعقیب و محاکمه است؛ اما اینکه بر اساس ظرفیت‌های حقوق کیفری بین‌المللی در زمینه اصول و معیارهای تعیین صلاحیت دادگاه‌های داخلی کشورها و در رابطه با تأسیس و فعالیت دادگاه‌های بین‌المللی، نهایتاً در کدام دادگاه و چگونه امکان تعقیب و محاکمه این افراد وجود دارد و اینکه دست‌یابی به چنین هدفی با چه موانع و محدودیت‌های حتمی یا احتمالی مواجه خواهد شد، پرسشی است که بررسی و پاسخ به آن، موضوع این مقاله را تشکیل می‌دهد. یافته‌های این پژوهش که بر اساس روش تحلیلی – توصیفی و با استناد به منابع کتابخانه‌ای انجام گرفته است، نشان می‌دهد که در قلمرو صلاحیت داخلی کشورها، فرض مداخله قضایی از طریق اصول صلاحیتی سرزمینی و فراسرزمینی حتی صلاحیت جهانی با توجه به محدودیت‌های قانونی، قضایی و اجرایی آن، امری ناممکن و یا بسیار محدود، ناچیز و ناکارآمد است. در سطح بین‌المللی نیز امکان تعقیب این جنایات با تشکیل دادگاه‌های اختصاصی یا مختلط و یا با ارجاع وضعیت فلسطین به دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی از سوی شورای امنیت سازمان ملل، فرضی ناممکن و یا بسیار غیرمحتمل به نظر می‌رسد؛ اما با دولت محسوب شدن فلسطین و بر آن اساس، پذیرش صلاحیت موردی دیوان و الحاق به اساسنامه آن و ارجاع وضعیت توسط دولت فلسطین یا دولت دیگر عضو اساسنامه به دیوان و نیز با ابتکار دادستان دیوان به آغاز تحقیقات، اعمال صلاحیت دیوان کیفری نسبت به جنایات ارتکابی موردبحث، امکان‌پذیر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A reflection on the feasibility of national and international prosecution of the crimes committed by the Zionist regime in Gaza

نویسنده [English]

  • F Forughi
shiraz university
چکیده [English]

In today's global arena, the Zionist regime stands accused of egregious crimes against humanity, particularly in its occupation of Palestinian territories and its conduct during various conflicts, notably the 22-day war in 2008, the 8-day war in 2012, and the recent intensification of hostilities starting in October 2023. Throughout these conflicts, the regime has systematically violated international humanitarian law, subjecting the defenseless people of Gaza to siege conditions, depriving them of essential resources like water, food, and medicine, and perpetrating acts of persecution, torture, and displacement.
Numerous reports from UN agencies corroborate the widespread commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and potentially genocide by the occupying Israeli forces. Consequently, global attention has turned to the urgent need for accountability and justice for the victims of these atrocities. However, the path to holding the perpetrators accountable is fraught with legal and political challenges.
Questions arise regarding which courts possess jurisdiction over these crimes and how legal proceedings can be initiated. Despite the clear imperative for justice, limitations within national and international legal frameworks complicate the prosecution of these crimes. Palestinian and Israeli courts face restrictions in addressing these violations, while legal proceedings in other countries may prove ineffective due to political considerations and obstacles such as the immunity granted to high-ranking state officials.
Although international mechanisms such as the establishment of ad hoc courts by the Security Council or referral to the International Criminal Court offer potential avenues for justice, political dynamics, particularly US support for Israel, present significant obstacles. Therefore, the most viable option for pursuing accountability lies with the ICC, either through referral by a member state or the prosecutor's initiative. By accepting the ICC's jurisdiction and referring the situation in Palestine and Gaza to the Court, the State of Palestine can pave the way for legal action. In addition, seeking intervention from the International Court of Justice to prevent further atrocities and secure reparations holds promise. By taking immediate action to prevent genocide and subsequent obligations to compensate damages, the ICJ can play a crucial role in addressing the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
In conclusion, while the pursuit of justice for the crimes committed by the Zionist regime presents formidable challenges, concerted efforts within the international legal framework offer hope for accountability and redress for the victims.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • International crimes
  • national courts
  • international courts
  • Gaza
  • Zionist regime
  • criminal jurisdiction

مراجع

A/HRC/12/48, HUMAN RIGHTS Council, Twelfth Session, Report of the United Nations Fact. Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict, Agenda item7, ai.c, para. 1967. (2009). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/specialsession/9/docs/UNFFMGC_Report.pdf
Abedini, A., & Behri Khayavi, B. (2022). Case against Israel for committing genocide in the International Court of Justice: possible scenarios. Journal of Islamic Law, 77-117 [In Persian].
Aghaei Jannet Makan, H. (2012). Definition, elements and conditions of the exercise of jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the crime of aggression with a view to the Kampala Agreement. Journal of International Law, 28(44), 162-183 [In Persian].
Alborzi Varki, M. (2008). Human rights and humanitarian rights. Fundamental Rights Journal, 14(8), 17-41 [In Persian].
Allameh, G. H. (2005). Crime against humanity in international criminal law. Tehran: Meezan.
Bassiouni, M. (1999). International criminal law, Second Edition (Vol. 2). New York: Transnational Publishers.
Beckett, W. E. (1927). Criminal Jurisdiction Over Foreigners. HeinOnline.
Begzadeh, E. (1998). Examining the Crime of Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity in the Statute of the International Criminal Court. Journal of Legal Research(21-22), 69-104 [In Persian].
Begzadeh, E. (1998). The United Nations and International Criminal Courts. Journal of Legal Research(18), 63-67 [In Persian].
Begzadeh, E., & Qawamabadi, M. H. (2021). State Referrals to the International Criminal Court. Legal Research Quarterly, (93), 117-87.(93), 87-117 [In Persian].
Cameron, I. (1994). The Protective principle of International Criminal Jurisdiction, . Dartmouth Publishing Company.
Cassesse, A. (2008). International criminal law. (H. Piran, A. Amirarjamand, & Z. Mousavi, Trans.) Tehran: Jangal.
Chomsky, N. (2010). The 22-day war. (Z. Moradinaseb, Trans.) Tehran: Khorsandi.
Delkhosh, A. (2017). Combating with International Crimes, States Obligation to Cooperation. Tehran: Shahr Danesh Institute of Legal Studies and Research [In Persian].
Dickinson, L. A. (2003). The Promise of Hybrid Courts. The American Journal of International Law, 97(2).
Dihim, A. (2005). An Introduction to International Criminal Law (in the Light of the Statute of the International Criminal Court). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications [In Persian].
Ebrahimi, S. N. (2000). An introduction to the establishment of the International Criminal Court and the evaluation of its statute. In H. Al-Ishaq, International Criminal Court and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications [In Persian].
Foroughi, F. (2010). Nantional Obstacles and Limits to International Crimes. Journal of Legal Studies, 2(2), 130-146 [In Persian].
Frulli, M. (2002). The ICJ Judgement on the Belgium v. Congo Case (14 February 2002): a Cautious Stand on Immunity from Prosecution for International Crimes. German Law Journal, 3(3), E6.
Gaza crisis: General Assembly adopts resolution calling for ‘humanitarian truce’, civilian protection. (2023, October 27). Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/10/1142932
Gaza: UN experts call on international community to prevent genocide against the Palestinian people. (2023, November 13). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-un-experts-call-international-community-prevent-genocide-against
Greafrath, B. (1990). Universal Jurisdiction and International Crimind Court.
Hosseini Akbarnejad, H. (2009). War Against the Laws of War: Assessing the 22-Day Battle of Gaza from the Perspective of International Humanitarian Law. Journal of International Law(40), 99-126 [In Persian].
ICJ Reports. (1951). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from Advisory Opinion: https://www.icj-cij.org/case/12
In Defence of Preliminary Assessments: Proportionality and The 31 October Attack on the Jabalia Refugee Camp. (2023, November 8). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.ejiltalk.org/in-defence-of-preliminary-assessments-proportionality-and-the-31-october-attack-on-the-jabalia-refugee-camp/
Israel commits widespread war crimes in Gaza, humanitarian catastrophe is imminent. (2023, October 10). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/israel-commits-widespread-war-crimes-gaza-humanitarian-catastrophe-imminent-enar
Israel, Palestine and CERD’s Early Warning and Urgent Action Procedure. (2023, November 9). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://opiniojuris.org/2023/11/09/israel-palestine-and-cerds-early-warning-and-urgent-action-procedure/
Kamingah, M. (2003). Application of universal jurisdiction in relation to Gross Human Rights Offences. (S. B. Mohammad Javad, Trans.) Law Journal(28), 61-114.
Khaleghi Abolfath, S. M., & Hosseini, S. (2022). Powers of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in Prosecuting International Crimes. Legal Civilization, 5(11), 23-38.
Khaleghi, A. (2023). Essays on International Criminal Law. Tehran: Shahr Danesh Institute of Legal Studies and Research. [In Persian].
Lentz, G. M. (2009). The United Nations Security Council and the International Criminal Court, Referral mechanism in theory and practice. (A. Pirzadeh, Trans.) Tehran: Khorsandi.
Mirfakhrai, M. J. (2000). Case of Pinochet's, a mixture of law and politics. Legal Journal(25), 85-128 [In Persian].
Momtaz, J. (2021). Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in the trial of persons accused of committing war crimes. In H. Al-Ishaq, International Criminal Court and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pub [In Persian].
Omrani, S. (2009). Israel's crimes in Gaza in the face of international criminal law, examining the ways of prosecuting criminals. Gawah Quarterly(14), 87-92 [In Persian].
Philippe, X. (2006). The principles of universal jurisdiction and complementarity: how do the two principles intermesh? International review of the Red Cross, 88(862), 375-398.
Pradel, G. (2009). Universal Jurisdiction. (S. A. Hanjani, Trans.) Journal of Legal Research(50), 587-611.
Ramezani Qawamabadi, M. H. (2015). From the recognition of the Palestinian state to the membership of the International Criminal Court. Political Studies Quarterly, 2(7), 1-40 [In Persian].
Randall, K. C. (1988). Universal Jurisdiction under International Law. Law Review, 785.
Ranjbarian, A. (2002). Universal Jurisdiction for the Trial of War Criminals. Bulletin of the Center for International Advanced Studies,. The Centre for Graduate International Studies, University of Tehran [In Persian].
Razavi Fard, B. (2010). The 22-Day Gaza War in the Mirror of International Criminal Law with a Look at the Goldstone Report. Journal of International Law(43), 203-224 [In Persian].
Reiss, R. H. (1987). The Extradition of John Demjanjuk: War Crimes, Universality Jurisdiction, and the Political Offense Doctrine. Cornell International Law Journal, 20(2).
Reydams, L. (2003). Universal Jurisdiction. Oxford University Press.
Saber, M. (2010). The office of the Prosecutor of International Criminal Court. Law Quarterly(2), 113-126 [In Persian].
Saedi, Z., & Salehi, J. (2021). The approach of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in requesting the issuance of a decree of criminal jurisdiction in the Palestinian situation. Research Journal of Criminal Law(2), 185-208 [In Persian].
Secretary-General's remarks to the press on the situation in the Middle East. (2023, October 9). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2023-10-09/secretary-generals-remarks-the-press-the-situation-the-middle-east
Security Council Fails to Adopt Resolution Demanding Immediate Humanitarian Ceasefire in Gaza on Account of Veto by United States. (2023, December 8). Retrieved December 27, 2023, from https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/security-council-fails-adopt-resolution-demanding-immediate-humanitarian-ceasefire-gaza-account-veto-united-states
Shahbazi, S. (2009). Evaluation of the Human Rights Watch (2009) report on the use of white phosphorus by the Zionist regime against the people of Gaza from the perspective of international law. International Legal Journal, 26(40), 71-97 [In Persian].
Sharifian, J. (2013). The eight-day attack of the Zionist regime on Gaza and the violation of security and international humanitarian rights. Security Research Quarterly, 12(42), 73-100 [In Persian].
Shirzad, H., & Kharazi, F. (2010). Dimensions and effects of Goldstone's report on the Gaza war. Strategy Quarterly, 19(55), 79-95 [In Persian].
Statement of ICC Prosecutor Karim A. A. Khan KC from Cairo on the situation in the State of Palestine and Israel. (2023, October 30). Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-karim-khan-kc-cairo-situation-state-palestine-and-israel
Tahmasabi, J. (2016). Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Tehran: Mizan [In Persian].
Taleghani, H. (2009). Legal aspects of Gaza war and legitimate defense. Gawah Legal Quarterly, 43-48 [In Persian].
The General Assembly of the United Nations requests an advisory opinion from the Court in its resolution A/RES/77/247 on “Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusale. (2023, December 3). Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20230120-pre-01-00-en.pdf
Tohidi, A. R. (2023). Human rights and humanitarian violations by the Zionist regime against Palestinians since October 7, 2023. Journal of International Law(72), 203-218 [In Persian].
Vakil, A. S. (2011). Sanction of Fundamental human rights. Tehran: Mizan [In Persian].
Zamani, S. G. (2009). The strategy of prosecuting those accused of war crimes in Gaza based on the Goldstone report: Universal Jurisdiction. Legal Research Journal(15), 103-127 [In Persian].
Zamani, S. Q., & Hosseini Akbarnejad, H. (2009). The Principle of Universal Jurisdiction in the Mirror of the International Criminal Court. Research and Policy, 7(26), 204-242 [In Persian].
International Criminal court (2018a). Referral by the state of Palestine pursuant to article 13 (a) and 14 of the statute, 15 May 2018.
International Criminal court (2021). Decision on the ‘prosecution request pursuant to article 19 (3) for a ruling on the court’s Territorial jurisdiction in Palestine’, case No. ICC- 01/18-143.5 February 2021.
LJN AZ 7147 (2007). Court of Appeal The Hague, 29 Jan 2007.
Office for the coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), Flash Appeal: Occpied Palestinian Territory, December 2023.8.
S/RES/1860, 2009.
S/RES/ 681, 1990.
S/RES/ 2334, 2016.
United Nations Security council, S/RES/7212, 15 November 2023.
ICJ Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Mountengro, 2007. PP. 183-184
مطالعات حقوقی
دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 51
فروردین 1403
صفحه 179-228

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار