توسل به زور در حقوق بین‌الملل: مورد مطالعاتی مخاصمه 2023 حماس و اسرائیل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار حقوق بین الملل. بخش حقوق عمومی و بین الملل. دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی. دانشگاه شیراز

2 عضو هیأت علمی پژوهشکده تحقیق و توسعه علوم انسانی (سازمان سمت)

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده

در 7 اکتبر 2023، حماس به عملیات نظامی «طوفان الاقصی» علیه اسرائیل دست زد که به کشته و مجروح شدن بسیاری انجامید. اسرائیل نیز به اقدام نظامی علیه حماس روی آورد و بخش‌هایی از غزه را محاصره کرد. مقابله با اشغالگر در راستای حق تعیین سرنوشت از سوی حماس و دفاع مشروع از سوی اسرائیل، مهم‌ترین توجیهاتی بودند که برای این مخاصمه مطرح شدند. این مقاله بر پایه روش توصیفی- تحلیلی به این سؤال پاسخ می‌دهد که چگونه می‌توان مخاصمه حماس و اسرائیل را از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل توسل به زور ارزیابی کرد؟ نوشتار حاضر نتیجه می‌گیرد که نفس عملیات حماس، در قالب حق تعیین سرنوشت و نبرد با اشغالگر البته مشروط به رعایت مقررات بین‌المللی در انتخاب نوع، شیوه‌ و ابزارهای عملیات نظامی، توجیه دارد. همچنین نظر به تفاوت رویکرد گروه‌های تروریستی با گروه‌هایی از نوع حماس که با اشغالگر در مبارزه هستند، نمی‌توان اقدام‌های این گروه را تروریستی دانست. استناد به دفاع مشروع توسط اسرائیل نیز از آنجا که اساساً حمله مسلحانه‌ای در معنای ماده 51 منشور ملل متحد محقق نشده بود، از منظر حقوق بر جنگ پذیرفتنی نیست. اختیارات اشغالگر جهت برقراری نظم در سرزمین‌های اشغالی مطابق ماده 43 کنوانسیون چهارم لاهه نیز توجیه‌کننده اقدام‌های اسرائیل نیست.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Resorting to Force in International Law: A Case Study of Hamas and Israel's 2023 Conflict

نویسندگان [English]

  • Aghil Mohammadi 1
  • Abdollah Abedini 2
  • Amirabbas Kiani 3
1 Assistant professor in international law.Department of public and international law. School of law and political sciences. Shiraz university. Shiraz. Iran
2 Faculty Member of the Institution for Research and Development in the Humanities (SAMT)
3 Master student of International Law, School of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University
چکیده [English]

The incendiary attacks by the Hamas group from the Gaza Strip on October 7, 2023, towards the border areas of Israel, known as "Operation Al-Aqsa Storm," and Israel's robust military response to these attacks once again brought the issue of the occupied Palestinian territories to the forefront of the world's media. These attacks involved a combination of terrestrial, aerial, and naval assaults, with thousands of rockets launched towards Israel, resulting in significant damage to Israeli positions, including the loss of approximately 1400 lives and the capture of 240 individuals. In response to Hamas' operations, Israel officially declared war one day later, expressing its intent to engage in military conflict to eliminate Hamas and end their control over the Gaza Strip. Subsequently, Israel launched forceful and disproportionate offensives against the Gaza Strip, resulting in numerous civilian casualties. As of December 9, 2023, the casualties from these attacks have exceeded a staggering 17,700 tons, as reported by the Palestinian Ministry of Health. It is also important to note the extensive destruction of numerous buildings caused by these attacks.
From an international legal perspective, a significant aspect of the military operation on October 7, 2023, is the legality of the military actions undertaken by both Hamas and Israel against each other. Hamas has portrayed its military actions, particularly the October 7 operation, as a response to Israel's presence as an occupying force, aligning with the Palestinians' right to self-determination. On the other hand, Israel justifies its actions and attacks on the Gaza Strip as acts of self-defense. Both parties consider their actions lawful based on these grounds, which they view as crucial justifications. This article aims to explore, through a descriptive-analytical approach, the international law perspective on the use of force in the October 7 operation and the military actions of Hamas and Israel against each other.
According to the statement issued by the United Nations Secretary-General following the attack, the lack of opportunity for Palestinians to exercise their right to self-determination prompted Hamas to initiate military action to create a conducive environment for such exercise. Considering the founding charter of Hamas and statements by its officials against the Israeli occupation, the decision to conduct military operations on October 7 can be justified under international law as a manifestation of the right to self-determination. While some scholars, legal experts, and countries like Israel and the United States may view Hamas' actions as terrorism, Hamas' distinct approach towards the occupying force sets it apart from terrorist organizations. Hamas has demonstrated a level of influence and effective control over the population it represents, even if not all Palestinians endorse its methods and political objectives. However, exercising the right to self-determination does not grant a group the freedom to choose the type, method, and means of military operations. Therefore, the evaluation of Hamas' armed operations targeting Israel should consider the requirements outlined in Additional Protocol I to the four Geneva Conventions (1977).
Regarding Israel's justification for military operations in response to the October 7 attack, the claim of legitimate defense is contentious. While it could be argued that if Palestine were recognized as a state by Israel and non-state actors like Hamas were capable of armed attacks, Israel would have the right to defend itself under Article 51 of the Charter, the reality is that Israel does not recognize Palestine as a state. The prevalent view in international law, including the Security Council, is that self-defense is not applicable when an occupying power controls another entity. Even if Israel's self-defense justification were accepted, the conditions, including proportionality, for justifying severe international crimes are not met.
Israel's reliance on Article 43 of the Fourth Hague Convention for self-defense to establish order and security in occupied territories is also questionable. As Israel's presence in the territory is temporary and lacks sovereignty, this provision cannot be invoked when the occupier faces the people's struggle for self-determination. The actions of the occupier must adhere to international human rights and humanitarian law, which prioritize the right to self-determination as a fundamental human right.
The designation of Hamas as a terrorist group by Israel does not hold legal weight in international law. The determination of a group as a terrorist organization is the prerogative of the United Nations Security Council, not individual countries. Even if a group resorts to intimidating tactics, it may still be considered a liberation group, especially if it actively opposes foreign occupation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Israel
  • Terrorism
  • International Law of Use of Force
  • Hamas
  • Right to Self-determination
  • Legitimate Defense
  • Operation 7 October

مراجع

ABC news (2023). What we know about the Supernova festival where Hamas militants killed hundreds of attendees, (10 December 2023), at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-10-09/how-supernova-festival-was-attacked-by-hamas-militants/102950634
Abedini, A. Bahri Khiyavi, B. (2022). Litigation against Israel for Genocide in the International Court of Justice: Possible Scenarios, Islamic Law, 19 (74), 77-111. [In Persian]
Aghai Khajehpasha, D. (2013). An Analysis on the Political-Legal Solutions of Fights against International Terrorism, Politics Quarterly, 43 (1), 237-256. [In Persian]
Al Jazeera (11 October 2023), Analysis: Why did Hamas attack now and what is next? (6 December 2023), at:
      https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/10/11/analysis-why-did-hamas-attack-now-and-
Al Jazeera (17 November 2023), Does Israel have the right to self-defence in Gaza? at: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/17/does-israel-have-the-right-to-self-defence-in-gaza, (8 December 2023).
Al Jazeera (7 October 2023), World reaction to surprise attack by Palestinian Hamas on Israel, (11 December 2023), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/7/we-are-at-war-reactions-to-palestinian-hamas-surprise-attack-in-israel last visited: 9 December 2023
AP news (10 October 2023), Israel strikes and seals off Gaza after incursion by Hamas, which vows to execute hostages, (10 December 2023), at: https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-gaza-hamas-airstrikes-hostages-4377e096f62bf535bebcdff38cf16049
Atuonwu, C. (2021). Hamas: A case study of international terrorism, Port Harcourt Journal of History & Diplomatic Studies, 8 (3), 15-32.
BBC (2023). Nearly 100,000 Gaza buildings may be damaged, satellite images show", (8 December 2023), at: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67565872
Benvenisti, E. (1993). The International Law of Occupation, Princeton, New Jersey, University Press.
Brown, Nathan J. (2010). The Hamas-Fatah Conflict: Shallow but Wide, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 34 (2), 35-49.
Chadwick, E. (2020). Terrorism and self-determination, in: Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism, Edited by: n Saul, Edward Elgar Publishing, 285-299.
Dinstein, Y. (2004). Legislation Under Article 43 of The Hague Regulations: Belligerent Occupation and Peacebuilding, Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research- Harvard University, No.1.
Dinstein, Y. (2019). The International Law of Belligerent Occupation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Falk, R. (2002). Azmi Bishara, the Right of Resistance, and the Palestinian Ordeal, Journal of Palestine Studies, 31 (2), 19-33.
Flamer, N. (2023). ‘The enemy teaches us how to operate’: Palestinian Hamas use of opensource intelligence (OSINT) in its intelligence warfare against Israel (1987-2012), Intelligence and National Security, 38 (7), 1171-1188.
Frowein, Jochen A. (2011). Recognition, in: Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law, Online Version.
Ghasemi, A. Chaharbakhsh, VB. (2011). Threaten force and International Law, Public Law Research, 14 (36), 133-156. [In Persian]
Ghasemi, Gh. Moaiedian, A. (2020). The Relationship Self-Determination Right and Democracy from the Perspective of International Law, Legal Research Quarterly, 23 (89), 217-242. [In Persian]
Gill Terry D., Tibori-Szabó, K. (2019). Twelve Key Questions on Self-Defense against Non-State Actors, International Law Studies, Vol. 95, 467-505.
Habibzadeh, T. (2017). Resistance of Palestinians based on the Right to self-determination and the Obligations of International Community in this regard, Public Law Studies Quarterly, 46 (4), 825-854. [In Persian]
Jalali, M. (2006). Terrorism from the Perspective of International Law with Emphasis on 11 September Attacks, Journal of Comparative Law, 9 (52), 49-80. [In Persian]
Javadi Arjmand, M. Ghezel, B. (2017). International Terrorism: Practical Requirements and Theoretical Challenges, Politics Quarterly, 47 (3), 611-628. [In Persian]
Just Security (2023), Enough: Self-Defense and Proportionality in the Israel-Hamas Conflict, at: https://www.justsecurity.org/89960/enough-self-defense-and-proportionality-in-the-israel-hamas-conflict/, (8 December 2023).
Lesani, SH. (2012). Legislation Powers of Occupying Government with Pressing on Occupation of Iraq, Private Law Studies Quarterly, 41 (3), 279-296. [In Persian]
Linderfalk, Ulf (2020), The legal consequences of jus cogens and the individuation of norms, Leiden Journal of International Law, 33, 893-909.
Malik, A. (2023). Classification of the Israel-Palestine Conflict under the Laws of War, (10 December 2023), at:
     https://opiniojuris.org/2023/11/24/classification-of-the-israel-palestine-conflict-under-the-laws-of-war/
Margolin, D., Levitt, M. (2023), The Road to October 7: Hamas’ Long Game, Clarified, CTC Sentinel, 16 (10), 1-10.
Middle East Monitor (2023). Statement by Hamas’s Al-Qassam Brigades top military commander, (October 20, 2023), at:
     https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231007-statement-by-hamass-al-qassam-brigades-top-military-commander/
Milanovic, M. (2023). Does Israel have the right to defend itself? (14 November 2023), at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/does-israel-have-the-right-to-defend-itself/
Momtaz, J. Alizadeh, M. Zarneshan, Sh. (2017). Sea Blockade of Gaza Strip from International Law Perspective, Strategic Studies Quarterly, 20 (76), 137-154. [In Persian]
Momtaz, J. Ranjbarian, AH. (2007). International Humanitarian Law: Non-International Armed Conflict, Tehran, Mizan Publications. [In Persian]
Mu¨llerson, R. (2019). Self-defense against Armed Attacks by Non-State Actors, Chinese Journal of International Law, 18 (4), 751–775.
Murphy, S. (2011), Unique in international human rights law: Article 20(2) and the right to resist in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, African Human Rights Law Journal, 11, 465- 494.
Ramazani Ghavam Abadi, MH. (2016). The Recognition of a Palestinian State to the Joinder to the International Criminal Court, State Studies, 2 (7), 1-39. [In Persian]
Ranjbarian, A. H. Farahzad, M. (2015). The evolution of state formation criteria: from effectiveness to legitimacy? Public Law Studies Quarterly, 45 (2), 255-272. [In Persian]
Reuters (2023), Timeline of conflict between Israel and Palestinians in Gaza, (December 1, 2023) at: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/conflict-between-israel-palestinians-gaza-2023-10-07/
Reuters (2023). Hamas critique removed from Palestinians' Abbas comments on Israel attack, (October 25, 2023). at:
      https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/president-abbas-says-hamas-actions-do-not-represent-palestinians-2023-10-15/
Sassoli, M. (2004). Article 43 of The Hague Regulations and Peace Operations in the Twenty-First Century, International Humanitarian Law Research Initiative, 1-25.
Saul, M. (2021). The Right to Self-Determination and the Prolonged Occupation of Palestinian Territory, in: Protecting Community Interests through International Law, Edited by: Zyberi, G. (2021). Cambridge, Intersentia, 307-334.
Schmitt, Michael N. (2023). Israel – Hamas 2023 Symposium – the legal context of operations Al-Aqsa flood and swords of Iran, at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/legal-context-operations-al-aqsa-flood-swords-of-iron/
Schwenk, E. (1945). the legislative power of the military occupant under Artiche43, Hague Regulation, Yale Law Journal, Vol.54, 393-416.
Tavassoli Naeeni, M. Mohsenpour, S. (2014). Evolution of Resort to Force against the International Terrorism from the Perspective of International Law and International Jurisprudence, Journal of Legal Studies, 6 (3), 1-31. [In Persian]
Tsagourias, N. (2023). Israel – Hamas 2023 Symposium – Israel's Right to Self-defense against Hamas, (1 December 2023), at:
     https://lieber.westpoint.edu/israels-right-self-defence-against-hamas/
Von Glahn, G. (1957). The Occupation of Enemy Territory: A Commentary on the Law and Practice of Belligerent Occupation, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Weller, M. (2009). Escaping the Self-Determination Trap, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff.
 
Documents:
A/RES/1514(XV), 1960.
A/RES/2625 (XXV), 1970.
A/RES/2787(XXVI), 1971.
A/RES/37/43, 1982.
A/77/356, 21 September 2022.
UN Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/RES/2005/1, 7 April 2005.
A/77/356, 21 September 2022.
Convention (IV) respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and its annex: Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, 1907.
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol 1), 1977.
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 12, 1984
International Law Commission, Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001.
International Law Commission, Draft conclusions on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) with commentaries, 2022.
General Assembly, UN Doc. A/RES/67/19, 4 December 2012.
ICC, Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, on the conclusion of the preliminary examination of the Situation in Palestine, and seeking a ruling on the scope of the Court’s territorial jurisdiction, 20 December 2019, at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-icc-prosecutor-fatou-bensouda-conclusion-preliminary-examination-situation-palestine
ICC, Pre-Trial Chamber I (2021), Decision on the ‘Prosecution request pursuant to article 19 (3) for a ruling on the Court’s territorial jurisdiction in Palestine’, ICC-01/18-143. 5 February 2021.
Hamas: A Document of General Principles and Policies, May 2017.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Commission of Inquiry collecting evidence of war crimes committed by all sides in Israel and Occupied Palestinian Territories since 7 October 2023, at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/10/commission-inquiry-collecting-evidence-war-crimes-committed-all-sides-israel
United Nations Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, Study on the Legality of the Israeli Occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including east Jerusalem, 30 Aug 2023.
S/2023/742, 9 October 2023.
A/78/545, 20 October 2023.
Ambassador's Letter to UNSC Regarding Israeli Regime's Crimes in Occupied Palestine, 14 October 2023.
 
Jurisprudence:
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 2005, p.168.
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wu11 in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I. C. J. Reports 2004, p. 136.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgement, I.C.J. Reports 1986, p.14.
مطالعات حقوقی
دوره 16، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 51
فروردین 1403
صفحه 105-144

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار