نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 گروه حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The maritime transportation industry has undergone significant transformations with the widespread adoption of tanker charter party contracts, especially in the bulk transportation of oil and petroleum products. These contracts serve as vital instruments governing the intricate relationship between ship owners and Charterers, aiming to safeguard the interests of all parties involved. Although standardized forms are available, parties retain the flexibility to define specific terms and conditions. In practice, prefabricated standard contracts are often preferred due to their efficiency and familiarity within the industry.
In recent decades, the landscape of maritime transportation has been reshaped by economic and commercial sanctions. The fear of inadvertently violating sanctions laws has compelled parties to incorporate meticulous terms and clauses into their contracts. These terms serve as a shield, enabling parties to mitigate and manage risks associated with economic sanctions effectively. A focal point within these contracts is the inclusion of sanctions
clauses, widely recognized standards established by reputable institutions such as BIMCO and Intertanko. These clauses encompass a spectrum of provisions, including explicit definitions of key concepts, assurances against sanctions imposition, guidelines for handling sanctions-related issues, protocols for refusing voyage orders that may contravene sanctions, procedures for contract termination, and avenues for claiming damages. Notably, it is mandatory to include sanctions clauses in sub-charters and issued bills of lading.
However, a critical inquiry arises: do these standardized sanctions clauses truly serve as robust risk management mechanisms for economic sanctions? Upon meticulous examination, it becomes apparent that these clauses are not without their limitations. Ambiguities within the language and criteria employed in these clauses create room for varied interpretations during judicial proceedings. The broad terminology and ambiguous phrasing often lean in favor of ship owners, leaving other involved parties at a disadvantage.
This article delves into a comprehensive evaluation of the sanctions clauses established by esteemed international institutions such as BIMCO and Intertanko, as well as major oil corporations like BP and Shell. These clauses, subject to regular updates, are subjected to meticulous scrutiny, highlighting both their strengths and inherent weaknesses. Through this analysis, the article aims to provide a nuanced understanding, considering the viewpoints of legal scholars and interpretations derived from judicial decisions.
In conclusion, the incorporation of sanctions clauses into oil tanker charter party contracts has become an industry standard, reflecting the necessity to navigate the complex waters of economic sanctions. However, the key lies in meticulous drafting. Precise definitions, avoidance of ambiguous language, and transparent criteria are essential to establish fairness and equity between ship owners and charterers. Despite being developed by esteemed international institutions and major corporations, these standard clauses are not binding and can be modified by the involved parties. Hence, it is imperative that these clauses are tailored to strike a balance, aligning with the interests of all parties involved and adopting an optimal approach to risk management, especially for countries like ours, continually exposed to foreign sanctions. This article serves as a valuable resource for economic stakeholders, offering insights to aid in the formulation of effective sanctions clauses.
کلیدواژهها [English]
Black, H. C. (1971). Black’s Law Dictionary (Revised Fourth Edition), 23/10/2023, in
https://heimatundrecht.de/sites/default/files/dokumente/Black%27sLaw
4th.pdf
Britannica (1911). Encyclopaedia, 30/12/2021 in
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica /Charter-party
Department of the Treasury, Department of State & United States Coast Guard (2020). Sanctions Advisory for the Maritime Industry, Energy and Metals Sectors, and Related Communities: Guidance to Address Illicit Shipping and Sanctions Evasion Practices, 23/10/2023 in
https://ofac.treasury.gov/media/37751/download?inline
Dipaola, A., Kassai, L. (2021). UAE Sheikh Lays Claim to Oil Cargo U.S. Says is from Iran, 30/12/2021 in https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03-12/fujairah-owned-company-claims-stake-in-oil-cargo-seized-by-u-s
Djadjev, I. N. (2016). Law and Practice of the Obligations of the Carrier Over the Cargo: The Hague-Visby Rules, 18/10/2022 in
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/law-and-practice-of-the-obligations
-of-the-carrier-over-the-cargo
Hearn, M., Dickinson, H. (2020). Recent UK Case Studies: The Impact of US Sanctions on the Contractual Right to Withhold Payment and Key Compliance Takeaways, 11/02/2020 in
https://sanctionsassociation.org/recent-uk-case-studies-the-impact-of-us-sanctions-on-the-contractual-right-to-withhold-payment-and-key-compliance-takeaways
Martin, E. A. (Editor). (2001). Oxford Dictionary of Law (Fifth Edition), 23/10/2023 in https://www.ekhtebar.ir/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Oxford-Dictionary-Of-Law.pdf
Midwinter, E. (2018). Guidance on Drafting and Interpreting Contractual Sanctions Clauses , 23/10/2023 in
https://www.lexology.com/commentary/shipping-transport/united-kingdom/wikborg-rein/guidance-on-contractual-sanctions-clauses-in-commercial-maritime-agreements
Plomaritou, E. (2014). A review of shipowner’s & charterer’s obligations in various types of charter, 23/10/2023 in
http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/550a993f0831a.
Ritchie, N., Crisp, J. (2019). Sanctions, insurance and the case of Mamancochet Mining Limited v. Aegis Managing Agency Limited & Others, 23/10/2023 in https://www.collascrill.com/news-updates/ articles/mamancochet-mining-limited-v-aegis-managing-agency-limited-others/
Rydenfelt, M. (2013). Insurances in Ship Finance, 23/10/2023 in https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/3803166
Sorheim, E. D. (2021). Sanctions and STS Transfers- Legal Risks, 23/10/2023 in https://www.skuld.com/topics/legal/sanctions/sanctions-and-sts-transfers--legal-risks/
Stavis, K. E. (2018). Interpreting BIMCO’s Standard Sanctions Clause for Time Charter Parties in Light of US Sanctions Against Iran (Master's thesis), 23/10/2023 in https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/63757
Shamgholi, F. (2012). Sanctions against Iran and their effects on the global shipping industry, 23/10/2023 in
https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=2520391
&fileOId=3046709
UK Defense Club. (2020). Trading in Uncertain Times: The Impact on Charter parties and Issues for Consideration, 30/12/2021 in
https://www.ukdefence.com/insights/september-2019-trading-in-uncertain-times-150000/
Wallace, J., Lerede, F., Didier, M., Venezia, G. (2022). Ukrainian & Russian Hostilities – Charter party and Cover Issues Standard Club, 23/10/2023 in https://www.standard-club.com/knowledge-news/ukrainian-russian-hostilities-charterparty-and-cover-issues-4177/
Williams, R., & Williams, R. (2013). Gard guidance on maritime claims and insurance, 23/10/2023 in
https://www.gard.no/Content/20823111/Gard%20Guidance%20on%
20Maritime%20Claims_final.pdf
Contracts
BIMCO (2017). Bareboat Charter Party (Barecon), 21/10/2022 in https://www.unica.it/unica/protected/346056/0/def/ref/MAT341682/
BIMCO (2020). Sanctions Clause for Voyage Charter Parties, 11/02/21 in https://www.bimco.org/contracts-and-clauses/bimco clauses/current/sanctions_clause_for_voyage_charter_parties_2020
BIMCO (2020). Sanctions Clause for Voyage Charter Parties, 11/02/2021 in https://adamassur.hypotheses.org/files/2019/12/lien-1.pdf
BIMCO (2015 NYPE, 04/02/2022 in https://www.smf.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/22-document-nype-2015-sample-copy.pdf
BP (1998). BP Voyage Charter Party, 18/10/2022 in
https://pdf4pro.com/cdn/bpvoy4-voyage-charter-party-1cfcfa.pdf
Cefor (2022). Cefor Sanctions Limitation and Exclusion Clause, 18/10/2022 in https://www.swedishclub.com/media_upload/files/Circulars/2022/2022-288-sanction-limitation-and-exclusion-addendum.pdf
Golar Grand Corporation & Golar trading Corporation (2015). LNG Time Charter Party, 18/10/2022 in Available at: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1415916/000141591615000020/exhibit41timecharteragreem.htm
Intertanko (2011). Sanctions Clause for Charter Parties, 04/02/2022 in https://www.intertanko.com/info-centre/model-clauses-library/templateclausearticle/sanctions-clause
IUMI (2021). BIMCO AIS Switch-Off Clause, 04/02/2022 in https://iumi.com/news/news/ais-switch-off-clause-published-by-bimco
Conventions
Banco San Juan Internacional, Inc. v Petroleos De Venezuela, S.A. (2020); EWHC 2145 (Comm), 11/02/2022 in
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2020/2145.html
Eleni Shipping Limited v Transgrain Shipping B.V, (2019); EWHC 910 (Comm), 30/12/2021 in
https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2019/910.html
International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damages. (2001). 18/10/2022 in https://cil.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/formidable/18/2001-International-Convention-on-Civil-Liability-for-Bunker-Oil-Pollution-Damage.pdf
Lamesa Investments Ltd v Cynergy Bank Ltd (2020); EWCA Civ 821, 11/02/2022 in https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/821.html
Mamancochet Mining Limited v. Aegis Managing Agency Limited & Others, )2018(; EWHC 2643, 11/02/2022 in https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2018/2643.html
Osmium Shipping Corporation v. Cargill International S.A (the Captain Stefanos), (2012); 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 46, 04/02/2022 in https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff76760d03e7f57eac29a
)