نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
عضو هیات علمی(دانشیار) دانشگاه میبد
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The interpretation of "private plaintiff's consent" and "ways to obtain it" suffers from a kind of challenging ambiguity and conciseness. Therefore, research is needed in it. One possibility is its "subjectivity." This means that acquittal of the offender is possible only with the consent of the victim. Another idea and possibility is its "method"; That is, the output of satisfaction is not necessary, which is obtained in the form of words, but if the compensation is realized, satisfaction is achieved. The result of the approach of dividing the consent into real and legal is that in the title of private plaintiff, the aspect of privacy is superior to the complaint and, consequently, it is concluded that in addition to the direct method of satisfying the private plaintiff with apparent consent or expression, In case of resignation or compensation of damages to the private plaintiff by any person, whether the offender or a third party, the consent of the private plaintiff is obtained in a "judicial" manner. That is, obtaining the consent of the private plaintiff in a real and logical manner is not the exclusive way to obtain the consent of the private plaintiff
کلیدواژهها [English]
الف. فارسی
ب. عربی
)