نوع مقاله : مقالات انگلیسی
نویسنده
دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی د انشگاه خلیج فارس، بوشهر، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Today, numerous factors contribute to the process of legitimizing governance, and victory in the electoral contest does not signify the complete and thorough traversal of this path. Therefore, although those "possessing the majority of votes" are designated as the "people's representatives," and it is presumed that the decisions adopted by them reflect the "collective will," it is nevertheless sometimes observed that members of a society object to a particular decision and no collective consensus exists regarding its acceptance. The disregard of such protests by those in authority indicates that, in such a system, legitimacy has been reduced to a merely quantitative concept, while its qualitative enhancing factors are not pursued. The acceptance of the idea of civil disobedience is one of the options for reinforcing legitimacy, which plays a significant and commendable role in establishing an effective interaction between the government and the citizen. In this manner, by implementing the frameworks of civil disobedience, the considerable distance between the government and the citizen is bridged to some extent, and a valuable opportunity is provided for the government to continuously review its decisions. This paper endeavors, through a legal approach, to examine the capacities of the Iranian legal system concerning the potential acceptance of civil disobedience, while also addressing the limiting factors that erode a substantial portion of the existing capacities.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)