پاسخ به چالش‌های اساسی حقوق بشر ناشی از انتشار محتوای تروریستی برخط در پرتو رژیم حقوقی ضد تروریستی اتحادیه اروپا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران

2 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
با گسترش فضای دیجیتال و نقش فزاینده‌ اینترنت در تسهیل ارتباطات و انتقال محتوا، گروه‌های تروریستی نیز از این فضا برای تبلیغ، جذب نیرو و سازماندهی فعالیت‌های خود بهره‌برداری می‌کنند. در پاسخ به این تهدید فزاینده، اتحادیه اروپا مقررات 784/2021 را تصویب کرد که هدف آن مقابله‌ مؤثر با انتشار محتوای تروریستی برخط است. مقررات 784/2021 اتحادیه اروپا برای مقابله با انتشار محتوای تروریستی برخط تصویب شد و ارائه‌دهندگان خدمات میزبانی را ملزم می‌سازد تا محتوای تروریستی را در مدت زمان کوتاه (یک ساعت) از دسترس خارج کنند. این مقررات به‌طور بی‌سابقه‌ای یک رژیم حقوقی فراملی برای کنترل فضای دیجیتال ایجاد می‌کند. با این حال، چالش‌هایی قابل ملاحظه است؛ سرعت بالای انتشار محتوای تروریستی و خطر حذف نادرست محتوای غیرتروریستی که می‌تواند بر آزادی بیان تأثیر بگذارد. برای جلوگیری از این مشکلات، سازوکارهایی همچون حق اعتراض و نظارت قضایی بر حذف محتوا در نظر گرفته شده است. این مقررات گامی مهم در مبارزه با تروریسم دیجیتال است، اما باید از محدودسازی نادرست آزادی‌های فردی جلوگیری کرد و تعادل مناسبی میان امنیت و حقوق بنیادین حفظ شود. این مقاله با معرفی تلاش‌های اخیر اتحادیه اروپا برای مقابله با انتشار محتوای تروریستی برخط وفق مقررات 784/2021، سعی بر آن دارد تا چالش‌های اساسی حقوق بشر را با پاسخ به این پرسش که رژیم حقوقی ضدتروریستی اتحادیه اروپا تا چه حد امکان مقابله با انتشار محتوای تروریستی برخط را برای حفاظت از موازین حقوق بشری دارد؟ با روش پژوهش توصیفی تحلیلی مورد سنجش قرار دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Responding to The Fundamental Human Rights Challenges Arising from The Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online in Light of the Counter-Terrorism Legal Regime of the EU

نویسندگان [English]

  • Peyman Namamian 1
  • Ayatollah Jalili 2
1 . Associate Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak University, Arak, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
In the digital age, terrorists have moved to the online space, and this shift has created new threats that necessitate the development of appropriate legal frameworks. One of the main challenges in this regard is the conflict between safeguarding freedom of speech and combating terrorist content. On the one hand, freedom of expression must be guaranteed, while on the other hand, this freedom may become a tool for promoting violence. On April 29, 2021, the European Union adopted Regulation 784/2021 to address the spread of terrorist content online. This regulation specifically focuses on preventing the abuse of online hosting services for disseminating terrorist content and serves as a complement to the EU’s 2017 Directive on




Responding to The Fundamental Human Rights …                               Peyman Namamian




countering terrorism, aiming to protect public security and prevent online harm. However, this regulation faces human rights challenges, especially in preserving fundamental individual rights and preventing violations of freedom of speech. Human rights activists have raised concerns regarding the impact of this regulation on fundamental rights. Consequently, the challenges in this area can be divided into two categories: 1) challenges related to human rights and the protection of freedom of expression, and 2) technical and operational challenges in monitoring and removing terrorist content.
 
Method
 The article uses a descriptive-analytical approach to examine the challenges posed by EU Regulation 784/2021 in combating online terrorism. The findings indicate that although this regulation is a significant step in the fight against terrorism, it is essential to strike a proper balance between public security and fundamental individual rights to prevent violations of personal rights. Additionally, the article analyzes the nature and legal structure of crime, emphasizing the importance of maintaining this balance in the regulatory process.
 
Results and Discussion
 In the digital space, issues related to content regulation, especially in the areas of "misinformation" and “terrorist content”, have created complex legal and conceptual challenges. One of the most important challenges is the precise definition of “terrorist crimes”, which remains a subject of dispute at the international level. These ambiguities have prevented terrorist concepts from effectively addressing new threats, such as digital terrorism. Digital terrorism not only poses a threat to national security but can also lead to violations of human rights and individual freedoms.
EU Regulation 784/2021, aimed at combating online terrorist content, identifies five main categories of such content: incitement to commit terrorist offenses, dissemination of terrorist information, participation in terrorist groups, instructions for making explosives, and threatening behavior. These regulations seek to transfer terrorist content from the physical space to the digital one, but there are still challenges in aligning terrorist concepts with the realities of the virtual space.
One of the complex issues is striking a balance between freedom of expression and national security. International conventions, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, set limitations on state interference in freedom of speech. However, in the digital space, which operates globally and is complex, assessing these limitations is difficult, especially when the detection and management of terrorist content are not easily achievable. This balance can lead to violations of human rights and digital freedoms, particularly when decisions are made without transparency and are cross-border in nature.




Volume 18, Issue 3, Autumn 2026




Regulation 784/2021 grants national authorities the power to issue orders for the removal of online terrorist content, but this process faces challenges. One of the challenges is the uncertainty in defining terrorist content and its consequences for freedom of expression. Concerns grow when non-transparent, cross-border decisions are made, as this could lead to violations of human rights and digital freedoms.
Regulations and laws must be updated in line with digital developments and new technologies. This process must be designed in such a way that it prevents the spread of terrorist content while ensuring that fundamental rights are not violated. Human rights approaches in countering digital terrorism should be designed to protect national security while respecting individual freedoms and human rights.
 
Conclusion
 In recent decades, with the expansion of anti-terrorism regulations, crimes related to terrorism and the criminalization of radical speech have increased. The European Union has adopted regulations to address online terrorist content, but due to ambiguities in definitions and implementation approaches, these efforts have not been fully effective in preventing the spread of such content. The EU must adopt new regulations that increase legal transparency while simultaneously preserving freedom of expression. Effective solutions in this area include the use of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence for the rapid identification of terrorist content, providing precise definitions of terrorist content, and strengthening cooperation between security authorities, IT experts, and judicial officials. Additionally, ensuring the protection of human rights and collaborating with human rights organizations to prevent violations of individual freedoms is of particular importance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Digital space
  • terrorist crimes
  • online terrorist content
  • human rights
  • EU Regulation 784/2021
منابع
فرشا سعید، پرویز؛ جلالی، محمود؛ گودرزی، مهناز. (1400). ضرورت تدوین کنوانسیون بین‌المللی حملات سایبری. مطالعات حقوقی، 13(1)، 205-230.
سبحانی، حسین. (1404). رویکرد ریسک پایه ناظر بر عواید مجرمانه در پرتو مطالعه‌ ‌تطبیقی و استانداردهای FATF. مطالعات حقوقی، 17(1)، 157-200.
نمامیان، پیمان. (1403). الزامات حقوقی جهانی حفاظت از امنیت زیرساخت‌های حیاتی کشورها در قبال جرائم تروریستی فناورانه. دولت و حقوق، 5(4)، 46-25.
نمامیان، پیمان. (1404). رویکردهای حقوقی ناظر بر پیشگیری از جرائم تروریستی دیجیتالی علیه تأسیسات هسته‌ای. پژوهش‌های جرم‌شناسی کاربردی، 3(7)، 15-34.
هاشمی، کامران. (1400). دین، نژاد و مبارزه حقوق بشر برای حمایت از افراد آسیب‌پذیر. حقوق بشر، 16(2): 151-172.
 
References
Ahmed, R. (2023). Negotiating Fundamental Rights: Civil Society and the EU Regulation on Addressing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 19 Jun, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2222890?src=recsys
Bartels R. (2018). When Do Terrorist Organizations Qualify as “Parties to an Armed Conflict” under International Humanitarian Law? The Military Law and the Law of War Review 56(2): 451-464.
Bontridder, N., & Poullet, Y. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation. Data & Policy, 3: e32.
Brkan, M., M. Claes, and C. Rauchegger. (2020). European fundamental rights and digitalization. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 27(6): 695-714.
Clifford, B. (2021). Moderating Extremism: The State of Online Terrorist Content Removal Policy in the United States. The George Washington University Program on Extremism.
Conway, M. & Stuart, M. (2023). Introduction to Special Issue: The Practicalities and Complexities of (Regulating) Online Terrorist Content Moderation. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, (19 Jun), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/1057610X.2023.2222887?scroll=top&needAccess=true
Decoeur, H. (2017). The Criminalization of Armed Jihad under French Law: Guilt by Association in the Age of Enemy Criminal Law. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 25(4): 304-323.
Farshasaiid, P.; Jalali, M.; Goudarzi, M.. (2021). The Necessity of Drafting a Convention on Cyberattacks. Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 205-230. [In Persian]
Gherbaoui, T., and M., Scheinin. (2023). A Dual Challenge to Human Rights Law: Online Terrorist Content and Governmental Orders to Remove it. European Journal of Human Rights, 2(1): 1-22.
Macklin, G. (2019). The Christchurch Attacks: Livestream Terror in the Viral Video Age, CTC Sentinel 12(6): 7-24.
Kuczerawy, A. (2018). The proposed regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online: Safeguards and risks for freedom of expression (For Center for Democracy and Technology). Center for Democracy and Technology. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3296864
Milanovic, M. (2015). Human Rights Treaties and Foreign Surveillance: Privacy in the Digital Age. Harvard International Law Journal 56(1): 115-127.
Namamian, P. (2025). Global Legal Requirements for Protecting the Security of Critical Infrastructures of Countries Against Technological Terrorist Crimes. Government and Law, 5(4), 46-25. [In Persian]
Namamian, P. (2025). Legal Approaches to Preventing Digital Terrorist Crimes Against Nuclear Facilities. Applied Criminology Research, 3(7), 15-34. [In Persian]
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). Detection of Terrorist Preparations by an Artificial Intelligence Expert System Employing Fuzzy Signal Detection Theory, https://www.sto.nato.int/document/paper-2-detection-of-terrorist-preparations-by-an-artificial-intelligence-expert-system-employing-fuzzy-signal-detection-theory/
Pirkova, E., et al. (2021). Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence and Freedom of Expression: A Policy Manual (Office of the Representative on Freedom of the Media. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
Perrigo, B. (2020). These Tech Companies Managed to Eradicate ISIS Content. But They’re Also Erasing Crucial Evidence of War Crimes, Time, (11 April), https://time.com/5798001/facebook-youtube-algorithms-extremism/?xid=tcoshare
Hashemi, K. (2021). Religion, Race, and Human Rights Struggle for the Protection of Vulnerable People. Journal of Human Rights 16(2): 151-172. [In Persian]
Tomažič, L. (2024). Freedom of Expression on the Internet and National Security in Europe: Liberty and Basic Goods. NASK, 3(1): 1-16.
York, J. C., Karen, G. (2018) Offline/Online Project Highlights How the Oppression Marginalized Communities Face in the Real World Follows Them Online. Electronic Frontier Foundation, (6 March), https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/03/offlineonline-project-highlights-how-oppression-marginalized-communities-face-real
Raso, F., et al. (2018). Artificial intelligence & human rights: Opportunities & risks (Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 6). Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3259344
Reinisch, A. (2004). The Action of the European Union to Combat International Terrorism. in A. Bianchi (ed.), Enforcing International Law Norms Against Terrorism, London, Hart Publishing.
Skjoldager E. (2020). Lasse and Christian Bjørnskov. “Does Freedom of Expression Cause Less Terrorism?”. Political Studies 70(1): 1-19.
Sobhani, H. (2025). Risk-based Approach to Criminal Proceeds in Light of Comparative Study and FATF Standards. Legal Studies, 17(1), 157-200. [In Persian]
Zarmsky, S. (2024). Is International Criminal Law Ready to Accommodate Online Harm? Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of International Criminal Justice 22(1): 172–173.