منابع
الف. فارسی
بیژن، عباسی(1390)، حقوق اداری، نشر دادگستر
پتفت، آرین و احمد مرکز مالمیری(1393)، مفهوم و قلمرو اصول کلی حقوق اداری امکان و چگونگی استناد به آن در رسیدگی‌های قضایی، مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات قوه قضاییه
پتفت، آرین و علیرضا جمشیدی (1395)، «حقوق شهروندی در پرتو آئینهای نوین اداری»، فصلنامه اخلاق زیستی، شماره ویژه حقوق شهروندی، سال ششم، شماره 21، 50-23
راسخ، محمد(1389)، نظارت و تعادل در نظام حقوق اساسی، تهران، انتشارات دراک
زارعی محمد حسین، مرکز مالمیری، احمد (1384)، «مفهوم و مبانی نظارت قضایی با تأکید بر نظام حقوقی ایلات متحده آمریکا»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، ش 42. 151-202
زولر الیزابت(1391)، درآمدی بر حقوق عمومی: مطالعه تطبیقی بنیادهای حقوق عمومی آلمان، فرانسه، انگلستان و آمریکا، ترجمه مجتبی واعظی، تهران، جاودانه.
شوالیه ژاک(1378)، دولت قانونمند، ترجمه حمیدرضا ملک محمدی، تهران، دادگستر.
محمودی، جواد(1390)، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، انتشارات جنگل
مؤتمنی، طباطبایی منوچهر(1387)، حقوق اداری، انتشارات سمت
نوین، پرویز(1386)، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، انتشارات تدریس
واعظی مجتبی(1390)، دادگستری اساسی: مطالعه تطبیقی نظام‌های حقوقی فرانسه و آمریکا با نگاهی به حقوق ایران، تهران، جاودانه.
هامون فرانسیس(1383)، «صیانت از قانون اساسی در فرانسه و ایالات متحده آمریکا»، ترجمه محمد جلالی، حقوق اساسی، ش 2. صص 182-222
هداوند، مهدی(1390)، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، انتشارات سمت، 2 جلدی
ب. انگلیسی
Adler M.D. (2003), "Constitutional Existence Conditions & Judicial Review", Virginia Law Review, 1105-1202
Authenticated U.S Government Information GPO (1992), 14th Amendment: Rights Guaranteed
Bamforth N., Peter Leyland (2013), Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution, Oxford University Press
Bazan E.B. (2005), Congressional Authority over the federal Courts, Congressional Research Service
Beckett Julia (2010), Public Management and the Rule of Law, M.E. Sharpe
Bickel A. (2011), The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics, Yale University Press
Bongiovanni G., Giovanni Sartor, Chiara Valentini(2009), Reasonableness and Law, Springer Science & Business Media
Cane, P. (2009), Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication, Hart publishing,
---------- (2010), "Judicial Review and Merits Review: Comparing Administrative Adjudication by Courts and Tribunals", in Susan Rose-Ackerman and Peter L Lindseth (ed.), Comparative Administrative Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK
Carias B. (1989), Judicial Review in Comparative Law, Cambridge University Press
Calabresi S.G. (2008), “Substantive Due Process After Gonzales V. Carhart”, Michigan Law Review, Vol.106, 1517-1542
Chemerinsky E. (1999), “Substantive Due Process”, Touro Law Review, Vol.15, 1501-1534
Cohen M.R. (2002), Readings in Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy, Beard Books
Congressional Research Services (2008), the Constitution of the United States: Analysis and Interpretation
Cox A. (2012), “The Role of Supreme Court: Judicial Activism or Self-Restraint?” Maryland Law Review, Vol.47, 118-138
DeLeo John (2008),Administrative Law, Cengage Learning
De Tocqueville A. (2000), Democracy in America, University of Chicago Press
Edward W. (2000), The Constitution and the New Deal, Harvard University Press
Edin D.E. (2008), Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review, University of Michigan Press
Ely J.H. (1980), Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review, Harvard University Press
Fallon R.H. (2000), “As-Applied and Facial Challenges and Third Party Standing”, Harvard University Law Review, 1321-1370
Favoreu L. (1990), Constitutional Review in Europe,L. Henkin
Favoreu L. (2004), Droit Constitutionnel, 7th Edition, Dalloz
Fisher L. (2005), “Judicial Review of the War Power”, Congressional Research Service, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol.35, No.3, 466–495
Floren D. (2001), “Pre-Enforcement Ripeness Doctrine: The Fitness of Hardship”, Oregon Law Review, Vol.80, 1107-1138
Forte D.F. (1998), Natural Law and Contemporary Public Policy, Georgetown University Press
Funk,William (2010) F., Sidney A. Shapiro, Russell L. Weaver, Administrative procedure and practice: problems and cases, West Publishing
Georgetown Law Journal Association(1983), Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 71, Part 2
Gene R.N. (1987), “Ripeness and the Constitution”, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol.54, 153-183
Guntner V.V. (1943), Labor in the Struggle for Life, Cited In: The Mind and Faith of Justice Holmes: His Speeches, Essays, Letters, and Judicial Opinions, Transaction Publishers
Hamburge P. (2011), “Privileges or Immunities”, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, No. 1, 61-147
Hall J.P. (2009), Constitutional Law, Biblio Bazaar
Hall M.I. (2009), “The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness”, The George Washington Law Review, Vol.77, 562-622
Hawley, J. D. (2014) "The Intellectual Origins of (Modem)Substantive Due Process" Texas Law Review, Vol.93, pp.275-350
Henkin L. (1976), “Is There a Political Question Doctrine?”, Yale Law Journal, 597-625
Hutchison M. (2005), Due Process: Document-Based Activities on Civil Rights and Liberties, Social Studies School Service
Isserles M.E. (1988), “Overcoming Over breath: Facial Challenges and the Valid Rule”, America University Law Review, 359-466
Kelsen H. (1988), Theorie Pure du Droit, 2nd Edition, Baconniere
Kendall D.T. (2004), Redefining Federalism: Listening to the States in Shaping our Federalism, Environmental Law Institute
Kommers D.P. (2004), American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes, Rowman & Littlefield
Knox D. (2011), Motion to Dismiss as Moot, American Bar Association
Lewinson J.L. (1935), “Limiting Judicial Review by Act of Congress”, California Law Review, Vol.23, 591-601
Little L.E. (2007), Federal Courts: Examples & Explanations, Aspen
Longer L. (2002), Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study, Sunny Press
Madison P.A. (2013), Historical Analysis of the Meaning of the 14th Amendment's First Section, federalistblog
Mandelker D.R. (2000), “Entitlement to Substantive Due Process: Old versus New Property in Land Use Regulation”, Festschrift, Vol. 3, No.6, 61-97
Martin M. (2010), “Advisory Opinions and the Influence of the Supreme Court Over American Policy Making”, Harvard Law Review, Vol.124, No.8, 2064-2086
Mayer D.N. (2009), “Substantive Due Process Rediscovered: The Rise and Fall of Liberty of Contract”, Mercer Law Review, Vol.60, 563-658
---------------(2010), “The Myth of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism: Liberty of Contract During the Lochner Era”, Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Vol.36, No.2
Musgrove W.R. (2008), “Substantive Due Process: A History of Liberty in Due Process Clause”, UNIV. OF ST. Thomas Journal OF Law &Public Policy, Vol. II, No. 1,
Monaghan H.P(1989), “Harmless Error and the Valid Rule Requirement”, The Supreme Court Review, 195-211
Nelson W.E. (2013), The Fourteenth Amendment: From Political Principle to Judicial Doctrine, Harvard University Press
Pacelle R.L. (2011), Decision Making by the Modern Supreme Court, Cambridge University Press
Phillips M.J. (1997), “How Many Times Was Lochner Era Substantive Due Process Effective?”, Mercer Law Review, Vol.48
Phillips M.J. (2001), The Lochner Court, Myth and Reality: Substantive Due Process from the 1890s to the 1930s, Greenwood Publishing Group
Poulson B.W. (1982), “Substantive Due Process and Labor Law”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol.VI
Pohlman H. L. (1993), Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: Free Speech and the Living Constitution, NYU Press
Redish, Martin H. and Jennifer Aronoff (2014)"The Real Constitutional Problem with State Judicial Selection: Due Process, Judicial Retention, and the Dangers of Popular Constitutionalism",William & Mary Law Review, Volume 56, Issue 1
Reed L.W. (2008), Great Myths of the Great Depression, Mackinac Center
Rosenkranz N.Q. (2010), “The Subject of the Constitution”, Stanford Law Review, Vol.62, 1209-1292
Rosen J. (2013),” Economic Freedoms and the Constitution”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol.35, No.1, 13-24
Raskys Mike (2014), “State Constitutional Law—Due Process— The United States Supreme Court. COST v. STATE”, Rutgers Law Journal
Rubin M.B. (2013), “Buchanan v. Warley and the Limits of Substantive Due Process as Antidiscrimination Law”, Texas Law Review, Vol.92, pp.477-516
Samaha J. (2010), Criminal Procedure, Cengage Learning
Sandefur T. (2012), “In Defense of Substantive Due Process or the Promise of Lawful Rule”, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol.35, 284-326
Sandefur T. (2010), The Right to Earn a Living: Economic Freedom and the Law, Cato Institute
Shlapentokh V., Eric Beasley, (2013) Restricting Freedoms: Limitations on the Individual in Contemporary America, Transaction Publishers
Schneider C. (2000), Law at the End of Life: The Supreme Court and Assisted Suicide, University of Michigan Press
Sullivan, Frank (2013) "Assuring Due Process through Merit Selection of Judges" Indiana Law Review, Vol. 46
Troper M. (2000), La Philosophie du Droit, 1st Edition
Thomas, Curtis (2013) "Substantive Due Process: The Power to Grant Monopolies in the Federalist Marketplace of State Experimentation" the Brigham Young University Law Review, Volume 2013, Issue 2, pp.393-420
Volokh, A. (2014) "The New Private-Regulation Skepticism: Due Process, Non-Delegation, and Antitrust Challenges", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.931-1007
Waters R.C. (1987), “Judicial Immunity Vs. Due Process When Should a Judge Be Subject to Suit?”, Cato Journal, Vol.7, No.2, 461-474
Weinberg L. (2007), “Dred Scott and the Crisis of 1860, Symposium: 150th Anniversary of the Dred Scott Decision”, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 97
--------------- (2013), "A General Theory of Governance: Due Process and Lawmaking Power", William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp.1057-1120
Yarbrough T.E. (1988), Mr. Justice Black and His Critics, Duke University Press.
)