Methodology for Remedy in Case of Violations of Human Rights by Transnational Corporations: Civil Liability in Fuzzy Logic or a Mechanism Beyond Civil Liability?

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

ab

Abstract

The increasing growth of transnational corporations and their profound effects on the human life requires an appropriate and effective legal system. In this regard, the issue of remedy for human rights violations, committed by these companies is one of the serious challenges in the international and domestic legal system. On the one hand, despite the international nature of transnational corporations, the international liability of transnational corporations has yet to be defined in inetrantional human right law. On the other hand, due to the complex and transnational structure of these companies, there are serious challenges and obstacles in establishing civil liability in the domestic system for the damages caused by the harmful activities of these companies. This article aims to analyze the incompatibility between the traditional elements of civil liability with the complex structures of transnational corporations, therefore to answer the question of how the remedy can be provided in case of violation of human rights committed by transnational corporations. Can the extension of the traditional elements of civil liability in a fuzzy logic, adapt the civil liability mechanism to the needs of complex structures of transnational corporations, or should we seek remedy in a mechanism beyond civil liability?

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

 
Bittle, S., Snider, L. (2013) “Examining the Ruggie Report: Can Voluntary Guidelines Tame Global Capitalism?”, Critical Criminology, Springer, No. 21, pp. 177–192.
Commission on Human Rights (2004) Report on the sixtieth session: 2004/116. Responsibilities of transnational corporations and related business enterprises with regard to human rights.
Deva, Surya, Bilchitz, David (dirs.) (2013) Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Global Justice Now (2016) “Controlling Corporations The case for a UN Treaty on Transnational Corporations and Human Rights”. Global Justice Now Publicqtion.
Human Rights Council (2008) Clarifying the Concepts of “Sphere of influence” and “Complicity”: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, John Ruggie.
Lustig, Doreen (2020) Veiled Power, International Law and the Private Corporation, 1886–1981, Oxford University Press.
John G. Ruggie (2007) “State Responsibilities to Regulate and Adjudicate Corporate Activities under the United Nations’ core Human Rights Treaties: Prepared for the mandate of the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General (SRSG) on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises”, [s.l.]: Kennedy School of Government and Harvard Law School.
John, Ruggie (2008) Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises.
NOLAN, Justine (2016) Business and Human Rights in Context, in Dorothée BAUMANN-PAULY et Justine NOLAN (dirs.), Business and Human Rights: From Principles to Practice, [s.l.]: Routledge.
OHCHR (2012) The corporate responsibility to respect human rights: an interpretive guide.
Record, Katherine L, and S Bryn Austin (2016) "Paris Thin": A Call to Regulate Life-Threatening Starvation of Runway Models in the US Fashion Industry.” American Journal of Public |Health, Vol. 106, No. 2, pp. 205–206.
Shelton, Dinah (2015) Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Third edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights (2003) Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights.
UN General Assembly (1966) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework.
United Nations General Assembly (1984) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
United Nations General Assembly (1985) Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power.
United Nations General Assembly (2005) Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.
Weissbrodt, David (2017) Business and Human Rights, in Human Rights and Corporations, [s.l.]: Routledge.
Wijesinghe, Prasadi (2018) “Environmental Pollution and Human Rights Violations by Multinational Corporations”. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3164142     or
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3164142
ج. فرانسه
Conseil des Droits de l’homme (2014) Résolution 26/9 : Élaboration d’un instrument international juridiquement contraignant sur les sociétés transnationales et autres entreprises et les droits de l’homme.
Delebecque, Philippe, Jerome pansier, Frederic (2008) Droit des obligations. 4é.éd. LexisNexis.
Légier, Gérard (2008) Droit civil. Les obligations. 19é.éd. Dalloz.
Lienhard. Claude (1995) Pour un droit des catastrophes. Recueil Dalloz.
Mireille DELMAS-MARTY et Izorche MARIE-LAURE (2000) Marge nationale d’appréciation et internationalisation du droit. Réflexions sur la validité formelle d’un droit commun pluraliste  , Revue internationale de droit comparé, vol. 52, no 4, Pp. 753-780.
Monnheimer, Maria (2021) Due diligence obligations in international human rights law, Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Toulet, Valérie (2001) Droit civil. Obligations.Responsabilité civile. 1é.éd. Centre de publications universitaires.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics