The Foundation of Legal Paternalism with a Look at its Role in Criminalization

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University

2 PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Abstract: Theoretical foundations of legal paternalism stem from particular epistemological, ethical and political theories. The existence of a wide range of paternalism such as soft, hard, strict, wide, pure and impure has led to the emergence of different attitudes toward paternalism. Recognition of legal paternalism requires a kind of authoritative legal system and results in ignoring the rights to freedoms of citizens and limitation of their choices. By criticizing the epistemic, moral and political foundations of paternalism, the article accepts paternalism in all aspects of citizen’s affairs including criminal issues only in a very limited way and exceptional cases. Findings of this study suggest that paternalism is accepted only if it does not violate the complete freedom of citizens and is seriously necessary. Moreover, paternalism is justified when its targets lack knowledge about matters as in case of infants, insanes and mentally ill people.
Keywords: Legal paternalism, harm to self, theory of political power, criminalization.

Keywords

References

Aquinas, Thomas (1982) On Kingship, Pontificial Institute of Medieval Studies, New York: Hafner Pub.
Aquinas, Thomas (2002) Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bentham, Jeremy (1789) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, New York: Hafner Pub.
Carr, David & Jan Steutel (1999) Virtue Ethics and Education, London & New York: Routledge.
Cholbi, Michael (2013) “Kantian Paternalism and Suicide Intervention”, In Christian Coons & Michael Weber (Ed) Paternalism: Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115-133.
Craig, Edward (1998) Routledge Encyclopedia in Philosophy, London: Routledge.
Croce, Michael (2018) “Epistemic Paternalism and the Service Conception of Epistemic Authority”, Metaphilosophy Journal, Vol. 49, No 3, pp. 305-327.
Dworkin, Gerald (1971) Paternalism, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Dworkin, Gerald (2017) “Paternalism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , Edward N. Zalta (ed.),(Seen in 2/11/2018) at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/paternalism.
Fahmy, Melissa Seymour (2018) “Kantian perspectives on paternalism”, Seen in 2/8/2018 at Routledge Handbooks Online.
Feinberg, Joel (1986) Harm to Self, New York: Oxford University Press.
Filmer, Sir Robert (1991) Patriarcha and Other Writings, Edit- ed. by Johann P. Summerville, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fricker, Miranda (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, New York: Oxford University Press.
Grill, Kalle (2010( “Paternalism”, Encyclopedia of paper, No. 8.
Groll, Daniel (2012) “Paternalism, Respect, and the Will”, Ethics Journal, Vol. 122, No. 4, pp. 692- 720.
Hamilton, Sally & Hoje Jo & Meir Statman (1993) “Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds.” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 62-66.
Hampton, Jean (2009) Political Philosophies and Political Ideologies, Montreal: West View Press, McGill-Queen's University Press.
Hosper, John (1980) “Libertarianism and legal Paternalism”, The Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 255-265.
Kretzmann, Norman and Eleonore Stump (1993) “The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas”, Seen in 5/12/2018 at https://philpapers.org/rec/KRETCC-5
Laborde, Cecile (2012) “State Paternalism and Religious Dress Code”, I.CON Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 398-410.
Loginova, Uliana (2012) “Paternalism, Libertarianism and the Nature of Disagreement”, Seen in 2/11/2018 at http:/ssrn.com/abstract= 2113974
Mill, John Stuart (1869) Utilitarianism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Pritchard, Duncan (2009) “Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value”, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement  Journal, Vol. 64, pp. 19-43.
Researchgate.net, “On the Viability of Epistemic Paternalism: Personal Autonomy”, Seen in 30/9/2018 at www.researchgate.net/publication/304855568.
Salazar V. Alberto R. (2012) “Libertarian Paternalism and the Danger of Nudging Consumers”, King's Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 51–67.
Skipper, Robert (2012) “Obesity: Towards a System of Libertarian Paternalistic Public Health Interventions”, Public Health Ethics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp 181–191.
Slote, Michael (2000) Virtue Ethics, The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, Chicago: Blackwell Pub.
Smart, John Jamieson Carswel & Bernard Williams (1973) Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suber, Peter (1999) Paternalism: Philosophy on Law: An Encyclopedia, New York: Garland Pub.
Sunstein, Cass R.(2015) “Nudging and Choice Architecture: Ethical Considerations”, Forthcoming in Yale Journal on Regulation, Seen in 30/9/2018 at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2551264
Thomas, Matthew, Luke Buckmaster (2010) “Paternalism in Social Policy-when is it Justifiable?”, Parliament of Australia, No. 8, pp 1-29.
Zagzebski, Linda (2012) Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief, NewYork: OUP Publication.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics