A Critical Appraisal of Effects of Different Levels of Negligence on Liability of Tortfeasors Under Iranian Law: A comparative Study

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 PhD Student in Private Law, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22099/jls.2023.42255.4605

Abstract

Classification of negligence into different levels, is a complex legal issue. Therefore, some commentators have entirely rejected its multi-layered nature and some others have identified its different levels. In an attempt to make sense of the nature of negligence, we have put foreward a new thesis. We have adopted a dualist approach in identification of the nature of negligence in the sense that while in principle resort should be made to subjective criteria in making sense of negligence, one must also take objective criteria into account. Accordingly, one faces instances where negligence is not of an ordinary nature nor an intentional one. In said instances, law confers certain effects on the acts commited. For instance, under Iranian Penal Code and Insurance Code, binging and excessive drug use entail consequences such as coupled damages and claims made by insurers for refund.

Keywords

References

Byrd III, Edwin H. (1988) “Reflection on Willful, Wanton, Reckless and Gross Negligence”, Louisiana Law Reiview, Vol. 48, No. 6, pp. 1383-1409.
Garner, Bryan A. (2004) Black’s Law Dictionary, Tehran: Nashr E Mizan.
Green, Fredrick (1928) “High Care and Gross Negligence”, American Law Review, Vol, 62, No. 4, pp. 545-578.
Howard, Daniel O. (1954) “An Analysis of Gross Negligence”, Marquette Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 334-342.
Keeton W. Page et al. (1984) Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 5th ed., Minnesota: West Publishing Company.
Martin, Patrick H. (2011) “The BP Spill and the Meaning of Gross Negligence or Willful Misconduct”, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 957-1028.
Monte, Jacqueline (1995) “Gross Negligence and Willful and Wanton Misconduct – Thanks to Jennings v. Southwood, Michigan Now Knows What They Mean”, Detroit College of Law Review, No. 4, pp. 1379-1416.
Sergent, Randolph Stuart (2000) “Gross, Reckless, Wanton, and Indifferent: Gross Negligence in Maryland Civil Law”, University of Baltimore Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1-74.
Voinarevich, Olga (2015) “An Overview of the Grossly Inconsistent Definition of Gross Negligence in American Jurisprudence”, John Marshall Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 471-494.
Ward, Justin (2013) “Filling the Gaps: The Value of the Common Law Approaching to Gross Negligence and Punitive Damages”, Juornal of Civil Law Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 215-250.
 
Cases
American Laundry Machine Industries, Inc. v. Horan, 412, A.2d. 407, 45 Md. App. 97 (Ct. Spec. App. 1980).
Apache Corp. v. Moore, 891, S.W.2d 671 (Tex. App. 1994).
Boucher v. Riner, 514, A.2d 485, 68 Md. App. 539 (Ct. Spec. App. 1986).
Coggs v. Bernard, 2 Ld. Raym. 909 (1703).
Denman v. Johnston, 85 Mich. 387, 48 N.W. 565 (1891).
Diamond State Iron Co. v. Giles, 7 Houst. 557 (1887).
Flint v. Pere Marquette Railroad Company, 14 Mich. 477 (1866).
Genay v. Norris, 1 S.C.L. (1 Bay) 6, 1 S.C.L. 6 (1784).
Gibbard v. Cursan, 225 Mich. 311, 196 N.W. 398, 225 Michigan 311 (1923).
Griffin v. Shively, 315 S.E.2d 210, 227 Va. 317 (1984).
Helme v. Great Western Milling Co., 43 Cal. App. 416, 185 P. 510 (1919).
Jardel Co., Inc. v. Hughes, 523 A.2d 518 (Del. 1987), and Thompson v. Bohlken, 312 N.W.2d 501 (Iowa 1981).
Kelly v. Malott, 135 F. 74 (1905).
LaCroix v. Through Department of Transportation, 477 So. 2d 1246 (La. Ct. App. 1985).
LLC v. Carver Fed. Sav. Bank, 914 F. Supp. 2d 280 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).
Mallet v. Kelly, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 61304 (App. Div. 2010).
Maryland State Department of Personnel v. Sealing, 471 A.2d 693, 298 Md. 524 (1984).
Massaletti v. Fitzory, 228 Mass. 487, 118 N.E 168 (1917).
Placek v. City of Sterlig Heights, 275 N.W.2d 511, 405 Mich. 638, 52 Mich. App. 619 (1979).
Pleasant v. Johnson, 325 S.E.2d 244, 312 N.C. 710 (1985).
Railroad Co. v. Lockwood, 84 U.S. 357, 21 L. Ed. 627 (1873).
Resolution Trust Corp v. Franz, 909 F. Supp. 1128 (N.D.lll. 1995).
Rideout v. Winnebago Traction Co., 123 Wis. 297, 101 N.W. 672, 123 Wi. 297 (1904).
Steamboat New World v. King, 57 U.S. (16 How.) 469 (1853).
Williamson v. McKenna, 354 P.2d 56, 223 Or. 366, 223 Ore. 366 (1960).
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics