Nuclear Blackmail in the Criminal Laws of Iran and England and Wales

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Graduated with Ph.D. degree in Criminal Law and Criminology

Abstract

The discovery and focusing on different advantages of application of nuclear energy do not mean to neglect the power of this type of energy to develop and expand activities that violate the safety and security of the community and its followers. Among these behaviors is nuclear blackmail that along with the threat of using the destructive power of nuclear energy, the illegal demands of individuals are asked to enforce. In this respect, England and Wales' penal system is one of the few systems around the world that have independently reacted to the commission of nuclear blackmail. Thus, both terrorist and non-terrorist dimensions of nuclear blackmail are separately criminalized. Contrary to England and Wales' penal system, the legislator of Iran has not yet paid attention to criminalize nuclear blackmail. In this regard, the purpose of this research is to study and analyze the penal laws of Iran and England and Wales against nuclear blackmail and to suggest a proper criminal strategy in related the beforementioned behavior.

Keywords


Ashworth, Andrew, and ‎Jeremy, Horder (2013) Principles of Criminal Law, OUP Oxford.
Bonino, Stefano (2016) "Extortion in the United Kingdom." Northumbria University Library. 325-345.
Brookman & et al (2010) Handbook on Crime. Cullompton. Taylor & Francis.
Bunn, Matthew, and Anthony, Wier (2006) "Terrorist Nuclear Weapon Construction: How Difficult?" The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 607(1), pp. 133-149.
Child, John, John J. Child, and David Ormerod (2015) Smith & Hogan's Essentials of Criminal Law, Oxford University Press.
Curzon, Leslie Basil, and Paul Richards (2007) The Longman Dictionary of Law, London: Pearson Education.
ElBaradei, Mohamed (2003) "No Nuclear Blackmail." Wall Street Journal,  22, pp. 1-2.
Elsenbroich, Corinna, and Jennifer Badham. (2016) "The Extortion Relationship: a Computational Analysis." Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 19(4), pp. 1-16.
Emanuel, Steven L. (2007) Criminal Law, New York: Aspen.
 Francis, Brian Joseph and Peelo, Moira and Soothill, Keith. (2016) "Blackmail." It is available at: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/view /year/2016.html (Accessed: July 30, 2020)
Friedman, Edward (1975) "Nuclear Blackmail and the End of the Korean War." Modern China, 1(1), pp. 75-91.
Grimal, Francis (2013) Threats of Force: International Law and Strategy, New York: Routledge.
Bettinson, Vanessa, and R. Ward (2008) Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008: Chapter 4, Explanatory Notes. London: Stationery Office.
Knafla, Louis A., ed. (2002) Crime, Gender, and Sexuality in Criminal Prosecutions, London: Greenwood.
Koelzer,Winfried (2005) Glossary of Nuclear Terms, Karlsruhe: Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe.
Martin, Elizabeth A., and Jonathan Law, eds. (2002) Oxford Dictionary of Law. J. Law, EA Martin.–[Fifth Edition].–Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-281.
Lùˆsted, Marcia Amidon (2013)  Nuclear Energy, Minneapolis: ABDO Publishing Company. Martin, Jacqueline, and Tony Storey (2013)  Unlocking Criminal Law, London: Taylor & Francis.
Ormerod, David, Child, John, John, and Child J. (2015) Smith and Hogan's Criminal Law, Oxford University Press.
Hooper, Anthony, David C. Ormerod, and Duncan Atkinson. (2011) Blackstone's Criminal Practice 2012 (book Only), OUP Oxford.
Phillips, Edward, Charlotte Walsh, and Paul Dobson (2001) Law Relating To Theft, London: Taylor & Francis.
Rivlin, Ram (2015) "Blackmail, Subjectivity and Culpability." Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 28(2), pp. 399-424.
Stoiber, Carlton, Alec Baer, Norbert Pelzer, and Wolfram Tonhauser (2003) Handbook on Nuclear Law, Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Townshend, S. (2012) UK Amendment to the Law on Universal Jurisdiction: Prolonging the Road to Justice. 1-9.
Walker, Clive (2015) Decennium 7/7: The United Kingdom Terrorist Attacks on July 7, 2005, and the Evolution of Anti-Terrorism Policies, Laws, and Practices (November 11, 2015). 2015, Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik - 545-555, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2792579