The Scope of the Authenticity Principle on Indefinite Option Clauses in Judicial Procedure

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 university of guilan

2 PhD student of Guilan University

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of the authenticity principle on indefinite option clauses within judicial procedures. In some contracts, the mechanism for terminating transactions hinges on these clauses. Upon agreement, either party terminating the contract must pay a fee. This typically deters uninformed parties from prematurely dissolving their contracts.
While the principle of honoring agreements implies the inclusion of indefinite option clauses, Article 401 of the Civil Code (BC) declares any option with no time limit null and void. This raises the question: can the authenticity principle prevent the dissolution of such contracts?
A close examination of Article 401 BC's purpose, contract annulment, and juristic opinions reveals a wide discrepancy regarding time limits in option clauses. Some scholars, like Sheikh Tusi, consider indefinite options valid and propose a three-day limit. They even claim consensus on their view. Conversely, others believe such contracts and conditions are invalid due to inherent ambiguity ("Gharar") potentially leading to fulfilling an unknown condition and ignorance about the transaction object.
However, both arguments against indefinite options have flaws.
Gharar:  The basis for voiding contracts with Gharar is the Hadith "Nahi al-Nabi an Bi'al Gharar." However, some jurists question its authenticity. Additionally, interpreting "Gharar" as trickery suggests a mandatory prohibition, not conditional nullity. Moreover, Sheikh Mortaza argues that relying on customary practices ("Orf") determines ambiguity. Only if the option period remains undetermined even by Orf would the transaction be void. Unknown conditions are also challenged, as the variables are likely defined, and ignorance cannot be assumed.
Article 401 BC's Oversimplification:** This article fails to distinguish between the types of indefinite periods and contracts based on transaction value. A temporary contract contingent on a future event (e.g., death) differs from a permanent one. Settlement agreements often include lifelong option clauses, with parties preferring a lifelong termination right. This raises doubts about the ruling's rigidity. While such agreements could transform binding contracts into revocable ones, this wouldn't necessarily conflict with their validity, as rules related to necessity and permissibility are not integral to the contract's nature. Additionally, a permanent option term wouldn't render the contract revocable, as death or absence of parties wouldn't dissolve it. Finally, the type of contract and its object value matter. Article 401 BC's generality might not apply to revocable contracts where detailed knowledge of the object is not crucial. The indeterminate value wouldn't impede their implementation.
This paper's comparative analysis of legal views and court rulings suggests that omitting a time period for option clauses is a common practice ("Orf").  However, to eliminate ambiguity, the findings advocate incorporating an Orf-based termination period. Failure to exercise the option within this period could be interpreted as an implicit forfeiture of the right. Notably, some jurists consider "Orf" a rule of general knowledge, deeming it sufficient for rulings as long as the transaction remains non-fraudulent and non-risky according to customary practices.
Finally, courts generally view contract annulment as a last resort, favoring the parties' implied will whenever possible. In some cases, the court might consolidate the option clause with the contract's fulfillment condition.  Alternatively, the time for fulfilling contractual obligations might be considered the termination period.  Regardless of the approach, courts often prioritize honoring the parties' agreement and interpret conditions narrowly to avoid extending Article 401 BC's application and dissolving the agreement.
While the principle of authenticity overshadows Article 401 BC in practice due to its conflict with common business practices, legislative intervention and amendment of this article seem necessary.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amiri Qaim Maghami, A. (2012). Law of Obligations, Volume 2, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation. ]In Persian[
Asdinjad, M. (2015) Basics of Civil Rights 3, Rasht, Haqiq Legal Works Publication. ]In Persian[
Ansaripour M., Woldbeigi F., Hossein Alizadeh, M. (2014). Gharar and its application in contracts, Private Law Studies Quarterly, 45, 21-40. ]In Persian[
Araki (1993). Al-Khiyarat, Qom, Institute of Righteousness. ]In Arabic[
Ansari, M. (2004). Kitab al-Makasib, Vol. 4, Mashhad, Jamal al-Fikr al-Islami. ]In Arabic[
Ansari, M. (2004). Kitab al-Makasib, Vol. 5, Mashhad, Jamal al-Fikr al-Islami. ]In Arabic[
Al-Sharif, M. (2021). Logic of Law, Tehran, Majd Publications. ]In Persian[
Allameh Hali, H. (1993). Tazkira Al-Fiqaha, Vol. 10, Qom, Al-Al-Bayt Institute, peace be upon him. ]In Arabic[
Allameh Hali, H. (1954). Varif al-Shia fi Haqm Shariah, vol. 5, Qom, Jama al-Madrasin Publications in the Islamic School. ]In Arabic[
Bahrami, B. (2021). The requirements of interpretation of laws and contracts, Tehran, Negh Bineh publishing cultural and artistic institute. ]In Persian[
Collection of judicial sessions on civil law issues (2007). Tehran, Javadane Publications. ]In Persian[
Emami, H. (2019). Civil Rights, Vol. 1, Tehran, Islamia Publications. ]In Persian[
Fayaz, M (2005). Tozih al-Masal, Qom, Nash Majlesi. ]In Persian[
Hosseini, M (2023). Civil law in judicial procedure, Tehran, Majd Scientific and Cultural ssembly. ]In Persian[
Hosseini Ameli, M. (1998). Miftah al-Karamah fi Sharh al-Qasas al-Allamah, vol. 14, Qom, Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute. ]In Arabic[
Hashemi Shahradavi, M. (2003). Al-Mu'jam al-Fiqhi, Laktab al-Sheikh Tusi, vol. 2, Qom, published by the Institute of Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence on the Religion of Ahl al-Bayt. ]In Arabic[
Ibn Faris, A. (1993). Al-Maqais al-Lagheh dictionary, vol. 4, Beirut, Dar al-Jeel. ]In Arabic[
Ibn Baraj, A. (1990). Jawaharlal-Fiqh, Qom, Jama'ah al-Madrasin fi Al-Hawza Al-Ilamiya, Qom, Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute. ]In Arabic[
Jazayeri, M. (1995). Hoda al-Taleb to Sharh al-Makasab, vol. 10, Qom, Talia al-Nur. ]In Arabic[
Jaziri, A. (2003). Fiqh Ali al-Mahabh al-Araba, vol. 2, Beirut, Dar al-Kitab al-Ulamiya. ]In Arabic[
Katouzian, N. (2015a). Moin contracts, 3rd volume (Grants), Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications. ]In Persian[
Katouzian, N. (2015b). General Rules of Contracts, Vol. 5, Tehran, Saham Saham Co. Ltd. ]In Persian[
Katouzian, N. (2015c). Legal practices of contract-arrangement, Tehran, Athash Co., Ltd. ]In Persian[
Katouzian, N. (2021). Philosophy of Law, Volume 1, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications. ]In Persian[
Khomeini, R. (2013). Esftataat, Qom, Institute for editing and publishing Imam Khomeini's works. ]In Persian[
Khomeini, R. (2013). Najah al-Abad's treatise and margin on Mullah Hashem Khorasani's (Najah al-Abad) treatise, Tehran, Works Editing and Publishing Institute. Imam Khomeini. ]In Arabic[
Langroudi, M. (2017). The general philosophy of law based on the originality of action (equilibrium theory), Tehran, Ganj Danesh publishing house. ]In Persian[
Langroudi, M. (2021 a). Legal Terminology, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publishing House. ]In Persian[
Langroudi, M. (2021 b). Mohashi Collection of Civil Law, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publishing House. ]In Persian[
Mohagheq Damad, M. (2004). Rules of Jurisprudence (Civil Section - Ownership and Responsibility), Tehran, Islamic Sciences Publishing Center. ]In Persian[
Mohagheq Damad, M. (2018). General Theory of Terms and Obligations in Islamic Law, Volume 1, Tehran, Islamic Sciences Publishing Center. ]In Persian[
Mohagheq Damad, M. (2017). General Theory of Terms and Obligations in Islamic Law, Volume 2, Tehran, Islamic Sciences Publishing Center. ]In Persian[
Mousavi Bojnordi, M. (2000). Rules of Jurisprudence, Volume 1, Tehran, Imam Khomeini Institute for Editing and Publishing Works. ]In Persian[
Mamaqani, M. (2003). Al-Mu'jam al-Fiqhi, Laktab Al-Sheikh Tusi, Qom, Institute of Encyclopedia of Islamic Fiqh according to the Ahl al-Bayt, peace be upon him. ]In Arabic[
Mamqani, M. (1905). Ghaya al-Amal fi Sharh al-Makasab wa al-Ba'i, vol. 3, Qom, Al-Zhakhar al-Islamiyya. ]In Arabic[
Mousavi Khoei, A. The document in al-Sharh al-Arwa al-Waghti, vol. 5, no place, no place. ]In Arabic[
Mousavi Khoei, A. (1998). Al-Imam Al-Khoei's Encyclopedia, Vol. 38, Al-Imam Al-Khoei Institute for Revival of Works, Qom. ]In Arabic[
Naraghi, M. (2004). Anis al-Tajjar, Qom, Qom Book Park. ]In Arabic[
Rouhani, M. (2004). Esftataat, vol. 2, Qom, Hadith Del Publications. ]In Persian[
Shahidi, M. (2006). Formation of contracts and obligations, Tehran, Majd Publications. ]In Persian[
Safai, H. (2021). Introductory course on the law of general rules of contracts, Volume 2, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation. ]In Persian[
Safai, H. (2011). Another look at the rule of sufficiency of abstract knowledge in the "transactional case" interpretation of Article 216 BC based on the Gharr rule, Legal Research Journal, 15, 41-61. ]In Persian[
Shahid aval (2008). Al-Shaheed al-Aval Musa'ah, Vol. 7, Qom, Islamic School of Science in Al-Hawza Al-Alamiya. ]In Arabic[
Shahid aval (1979). Al-Qaseer, Vol. 2, Qom, Mofid Book Shop Antaras. ]In Arabic[
Shahid sani (1992). Masalak al-Afham al-Tankih Shar'i al-Islam, vol. 3, Qom, Al-Ma'arif al-Islamiya Institute. ]In Arabic[
Saheb javaher (2000). Jawaharlal Kalam (Ta Hadith), Volume 12, Qom, Institute of Encyclopaedia of Islamic Jurisprudence on the Religion of Ahl al-Bayt. ]In Arabic[
Tabatabai-Qomi, T. (2001). Al-Dalayl fi Sharh al-Masal al-Masal, vol. 4, Qom, Mahalati Publications.]In Arabic[
Tabatabai, A. (1991). Riaz al-Masail, vol. 8, Qom, Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute. ]In Arabic[
Testari, E. Maqays al-Anwar, Qom, Al-Bayt Institute (A.S). ]In Arabic[
Tusi, A. (1986). Al-Khalaf, Qom, Jama'ah al-Madrasin fi al-Hawza Al-Ulamiya, Baqom, Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute. ]In Arabic[
Vojdani, F. (1964). Al-Jawahir al-Fakhriyyah in the description of al-Rawzah al-Bahiyya, vol. 7, Qom, Sama Qalam publication. ]In Arabic[