Understanding the Concept of "Official Religion" and Its Role in the Iranian Legal System

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Prof., Department of Public and International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 M.A. Student in Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

When a religion is officially endorsed and supported by a government, it takes on a formal role within the state. This means that religion becomes more than just a personal belief system; it becomes a state-sanctioned institution. However, a state with an official religion is not necessarily a theocracy where all aspects of governance are based on religious doctrine.
The existence of an official religion in a country's constitution shapes the boundaries of citizens' freedoms, depending on the government's understanding of democracy and its relationship to religion. In other words, religion, as a cultural system, influences a state's political and legal systems.
Given that constitutions are fundamental documents that both protect citizens' rights and define the limits of government power, they provide the most explicit examples of how states interact with religion. Different countries have adopted varying approaches to the relationship between state and religion, reflecting different understandings of freedom, the government's right to establish an official religion, and the freedom of conscience.
In the modern world, the trend towards secularism and the increasing emphasis on human rights have led to a movement towards minimal government intervention in citizens' lives. However, theocratic states often pursue maximum state intervention, promoting religious teachings and values throughout society.
It is also crucial to consider the rights of religious minorities when discussing the role of an official religion. The concept of religious minorities has emerged in political discourse and legal literature, reflecting the importance of ensuring fair treatment for all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs.
The Iranian Constitution officially recognizes Islam as the state religion and designates Twelver Shi'ism as the official Islamic sect. This has created a unique political and legal framework that differs from many other states. This research examines the impact of religion on both the political and legal spheres, demonstrating that official religions today have evolved beyond their traditional roles. In many countries with official religions, religion is seen as a higher authority that can be used to interpret and evaluate laws. This has led to a new hierarchy of norms, where religious principles often take precedence over secular laws.
Key questions addressed in this research: What is the relationship between religion and the state in contemporary societies?     How does the concept of an "official religion" impact the rights and freedoms of citizens?What is the role of religion in the Iranian legal system, and how does it influence the country's governance?
 
Methodology
The research employs a descriptive-analytical approach, using a combination of historical analysis and legal research. The study examines various interpretations of the concept of "official religion" and explores the implications of this concept for the Iranian legal system.
 
Key findings
The relationship between religion and state is complex and multifaceted.
The concept of an official religion has significant implications for citizens' rights and freedoms.
In Iran, the official status of Islam has had a profound impact on the country's legal system and governance.
The role of religion in the Iranian legal system is constantly evolving, and there is ongoing debate about the appropriate balance between religious and secular principles.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Holy Qur'an
Akrami, M. (2010). Analytical study of the relationship between two similar myths, Persian language and literature (Journal of Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tabriz), 53(220). 1-20. [In Persian]
Bowen, J. R. (2023). Islam and the liberal state: national identity and the future of Muslim Britain. Religion, State & Society, 51(2), 213–214.
Braddick, M. J. (2000). State Formation in Early Modern England, c.1550–1700. Cambridge University Press.
Bretscher, F. (2019). Protecting the religious freedom of new minorities in international law. New York: Routledge.
Doe, N. (2011). Law and Religion in Europe: A Comparative Introduction. OUP Oxford.
Emon, A. M. (2012). Religious Pluralism and Islamic Law. In Oxford University Press eBooks.
Evans, M., & Evans, M. D. (1997). Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Feirahi, D. (2013) Jurisprudence and Politics in Contemporary Iran, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Feirahi, D. (2016) Power, power and legitimacy in Islam (Middle Period), Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Fox, J. (2008). A World Survey of Religion and the State. Cambridge University Press.
Fox, J. (2016). The Unfree Exercise of Religion: A World Survey of Discrimination against Religious Minorities. https://ixtheo.de/Record/844049077
Fox, J. (2020). Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods before Me. Cambridge University Press.
Fox, J., & Breslawski, J. (2023). State support for religion and government legitimacy in Christian-majority countries. American Political Science Review. 117 (4). 1395 – 1409.
Ghammami, M. & Esmaeeli M. (2011) Concept and Function of Religion in Allame Tabatabae Ideas, Legal Studies of Islamic State Journal, (1) 1. 137 – 157. [In Persian]
Giddens, A. (2023). Sociology, translated by Hasan Chavoshian, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Haarscher, G. (2022). Laicite, Tehran: Agah [In Persian]
Hirschl, R. (2010). Constitutional theocracy. In Harvard University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674059375
Jackson, P., & Lockhart, L. (1986). The Cambridge History of Iran. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9780521200943
Kadivar, M. (2001). State Theories in Shia Jurisprudence, Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
Kadivar, M. (2003) Freedom of belief and religion in Islam, Reflection of Thought, 37, 37-44. [In Persian]
Kalanges, K. (2012). Religious Liberty in Western and Islamic Law: Toward a World Legal Tradition. Oxford University Press.
Khamenei, A. (1997) Mohadeneh (ceasefire agreement), Ahl al-Bayt jurisprudence magazine, 11 (3), 3 - 120. [In Persian]
Noland, M. (2003). Religion, Culture, and Economic Performance. School of Public Policy & Management Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.472484
O’Halloran, K. (2021). State neutrality: The Sacred, the Secular and Equality Law. Cambridge University Press.
Qari Seyyed Fatemi, M. (2011) Human Rights in the Contemporary World: Analytical Essays on Rights and Freedoms, Tehran: Shahr Danesh. [In Persian]
Razmjou, Sh. (2014). Persian translation of Cyrus the Great Cylinder, Tehran: Toos.
Rouhani, H. (1990). Documents of the Islamic Revolution, Tehran: Islamic Development Organization. [In Persian]
Sharp, R. (1966). Inscriptions in Old Persian Cuneiform of the Achaemenian Emperors, Central Council of the Celebrations of the 25th Century of the Foundation of Iranian Empire. [In Persian]
Smidt, C. E. (2008). Pews, Prayers, and Participation: Religion and Civic Responsibility in America. Georgetown University Press.
Soleimani, A. (2014). The criterion of inclusion of the title "People of the Book" in the Holy Qur'an, Jurisprudential Research, 11(2). 389-412. [In Persian]
Sophocles. (2013). Antigone. University of Wisconsin Press.
Stenlund, M., & Slotte, P. (2018). Forum internum revisited: Considering the absolute core of freedom of belief and opinion in terms of negative liberty, authenticity, and capability. Human Rights Review, 19(4), 425–446.
Taylor, P. D. (2005). Freedom of Religion: UN and European Human Rights Law and Practice. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA7590445X
Vaezi, M. (2022). Administrative Law, Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian]
Vaezi, M. (2023). Concept of Modern Constitution and its Conceptual Requirements, Comparative Law Semiannual, 7 (1). 219 - 236. https://doi.org/10.22080/lps.2022.24480.1417 [In Persian]
Vaezi, M. (2023). Foundations and Components of the Constitutional Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of the Existing Lego-Political Structure and Procedures. Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 10 (1). 265-286. https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2023.7751.2216 [In Persian]
Vaezi. M. (2016). The Place of Belief in the Legal System of the Islamic Republic of Iran, National Conference on Ethics of War, Ethics of Forgiveness and Friendship in Shiraz University, collection of published articles of the conference, pp. 379-395. [In Persian]
Vasiq, Sh. (2016). What is laicite? and a critique on Iranian theorizations about laicite and secularism, Tehran: Akhtran. [In Persian]
Velai, E. (2005). Apostasy in Islam, Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian]
Woolf, G. (2012). Rome: An Empire’s Story. Oxford University Press.
Zucca, L. (2012). A secular Europe: Law and Religion in the European Constitutional Landscape. Oxford University Press.
 
Judgment
Alexandridis vs. Greece No 19516/06 (2008) ECtHR
Conseil d’Etat, 26 August 2016, Nos. 402742, 402777 (8 September 2016).
Dimitras and others vs. Greece No 42837/06 (2010) ECtHR
Ebrahiminan v. France, Application No. 64846/11 (2015) ECtHR
Kokkinakis v Greece 25 May 1993, Series A no 260-A (ECtHR)
Mann Singh v. France, Application No. 24479/07 (2008) ECtHR
Papageorgiou and others vs,. Greece, No 4762/18, 6140/18 (2020) ECtHR
S.A.S. v. France, Application No. 43835/11 (2014) ECtHR
2013 Report on International Religious Freedom: Saudi Arabia". state.gov. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of State. 28 July 2014. Archived from the original on 18 January 2023. Retrieved 12 February 2020.
Journal of Legal Studies
Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 54
January 2025
Pages 429-468

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics