The Legal Status of Settlers in Occupied Palestinian Territories

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Public and International law, Faculty of Law, College of Farabi, University of Tehran.

2 Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Since the establishment of Israel by the United Nations in 1948, Israel has sought to annex Palestinian lands through various crimes and acts of violence. Subsequently, it established settlements on this land, relocating populations from different parts of the world, often accompanied by the expulsion of indigenous Palestinians. Paragraph 4 of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits the deportation of protected persons from occupied territories. However, decisions by the Israeli Supreme Court have not consistently addressed deportations carried out by military authorities under the guise of security concerns.
The objective of this article is to examine the legal status of settlers residing in the occupied Palestinian territories. Settlers, at times, engage in military activities or volunteer as human shields to assist the occupying regime, blurring the line between civilian and military roles. While occupation law aims to protect both civilians and occupying forces, ambiguity surrounds the status of civilians in occupied territories.
This article delves into the adherence to the principle of distinguishing between military and civilian entities during wartime, as outlined in international humanitarian law. Specifically, it analyzes the role of Israeli settlers in occupied areas resulting from Israel's settlement policies, exploring whether their presence supports the maintenance and stabilization of the occupation within the framework of humanitarian law. It also raises questions regarding the settlers' classification as human shields, their settlements as forms of military assistance, and whether they can be targeted as combatants.
Occupation law primarily aims to safeguard the civilian population in occupied areas and protect the rights of the occupied state, given the illegality of the occupation. Thus, the restrictive nature of these rules and the need for a narrow interpretation must be considered when interpreting the law governing occupation. In the absence of explicit legal provisions, the occupying government is prohibited from taking actions that violate humanitarian law principles.
While civilians are entitled to protection under international humanitarian law, this protection is revoked if they directly participate in hostilities or aid occupiers, making them legitimate military targets. This principle applies to settlers in occupied areas as well.
Furthermore, the transfer of civilian populations to occupied areas is strictly prohibited, and settlements near borders raise concerns of settlers being used as human shields to protect military installations. Settlers involved in conflicts may be classified as combatants and legitimate targets, especially if they act as human shields.
This article, using an analytical-descriptive approach, aims to demonstrate that residents of occupied territories can be considered combatants based on their engagement in armed violence and military activities. Through the implementation of multiple military laws, the occupying regime has effectively controlled Palestinian territory and allocated it to military settlers. The settlers' use of violence against Palestinians has significantly furthered the occupying regime's objectives. Settlers who relocate through Israeli population transfer policies and do not engage in military activities effectively become human shields for the Israeli regime's actions, potentially altering their legal status to that of combatants.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Bouchie´ de Belle, S. (2008). Chained to cannons or wearing targets on their T-shirts: human shields in international humanitarian law, International Review of Red Cross, 90(872).
Dinstein, Y. (2008). Distinction and Loss of Civilian Protection in International Armed Conflicts, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 38.
Dinstein, Y. (2009).  The International Law of Belligerent Occupation, New York: Cambridge University Press, second edition.
Hasan S., A. (2016). Reserch Report Commissioned by Premiere Urgence International (PUI) and MÉDECINS DU MONDE, External Reserch Consultant. In: https://www.premiere-urgence.org/en/tenders-and-consultancies/consultancies/
Henckaerts, J.M. (2021). Deportation and Transfer of Civilians in Time of War, Vanderbilt Law Review, in:
      https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol26/iss3/2
Roberts, A. (1990). Prolonged Military Occupation: The Israeli-Occupied Territories Since 1967, The American Journal of International Law, 84(1):  Published by: American Society of International Law.
 Kellerman, A. (1993). Society and Settlement: Jewish Land of Israel in the Twentieth Century, SUNY Series in Israeli Studies, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kolb, R. and Hyde, R. (2008), An Introduction to the International Law of Armed Conflicts, Oxford, Portland, Oregon, Hart.
 Levy, Y. (2023). Lines Increasingly Blurred Between Soldiers and Settlers in the West Bank, in: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/11/09/west-bank-palestinians-israeli-settlers-attacks-idf/
Médecins du Monde. (2014). Trapped Between Settlements in Palestine Villages around Yitzhar and Bracha Settlements, in: http://mdm-me.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/FACTSHEET-EN-8-10.pdf
Michael, L. (2023). Settlements Are the Engine of Israel's 'Forever Occupation'—and a War Crime, Democracy In Exile, Israel-Palestine, Palestine, in: https://dawnmena.org/settlements-are-the-engine-of-israels-forever-occupation-and-a-war-crime/
Rajab-Nejad, N, Akhbari, M, Yezhni, A. (2021). Security explanation of settlements in the West Bank with a telespatial approach, 2000-2020, Geopolitics Quarterly, 17(3).
United Nations Country Team. (2021). Gaza in 2020, A liveable place? A report by the United Nations Country Team in the occupied Palestinian territory, In: https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-195081/
 
Documents
A/HRC/29/CRP.4. (2015). Report of the detailed findings of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution S-21/1.
 A/77/328 (2022). Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, 14 September.
A/HRC/34/39, (2017). Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan. 13 April.
A/Res/2851 (XXVI). (1971). 20 Dec.
A/RES/3005/(XXVII), (1972). 15 Dec.
A/RES/32/5. (1977).
A/RES/47/172. (1992). 22 Dec.
A/RES/ES-10/3. (1997). 15 July.
A/RES/ES-10/4. (1998).13 Nov.
A/RES/58/98. (2003).9 Dec.
 A/RES/59/123, (2004). 10 Dec.
documents received from the Secretariat of the United Nations. (2023). Material relating to the Request by the General Assembly for an Advisory Opinion of the Court in: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20230531-req-01-02-en.pdf.
Case, targeted killing. HCJ 769/02 (2005). The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice of Israel.
Secutity council. (1979). Resolution 446.
Secutity council. (2016). Resolution 2334, 23 Dec.
Secutity council. (1967). Resolution 242, 22 November.
ICJ reports. (2004). Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
International Court of Justice Request for Advisory Opinion. (2022). Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, transmitted to the Court pursuant to General Assembly resolution 77/247 of 30 December, in: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20230117-REQ-01-00-EN.pdf
Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2001). ‘Israeli Settlements and International Law’ in: http://tinyurl.com/2jlgb3
OCHA, Protection of Civilians Report. (2022). -27 September - 10 October-, in: https://www.ochaopt.org/poc/27-september-10-o
UN.DOC. GA/RES/12/48. (2009). in:
     https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/12session/a-hrc-12-48.pdf.
https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc-241_0368-summary-geneva-conventions-fas.pdf.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics