Obligation to Bring an End to the Brach of the Rule Prohibiting Use of Chemical Weapons in the Light of Law of International Responsibility

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of International Law, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The most recent reactions of States to the use of chemical weapon in Syria, whether in the form of institutional co-operation, for example, measures set forth in UNSC Resolutions 2118 dated September 27, 2013, 2209 dated March 2015 and 2235 dated August 7, 2015, or individual reactions, including the US response to the use of chemical weapons in Khan Shaykhun suggests the obligations arising under Article 41 of the draft Articles of 2001 International Law Commission, following a breach obligation arising under a peremptory norm of general international law. Therefore, this paper seeks to answer the fundamental questions whether the rule in question is acceptable as a peremptory norm of general international law. A positive answer to this question will lead to questions about how to respond to the breach. According to the criteria set out in the report of International Law Commission reporter of 2017, the aforementioned rule has made its way to the top of international law norms, but practice of States in reacting the breach of the rule shows that any reaction to its violation must conform with the relevant legal framework and using legitimate means.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Costelloe, Daniel (2017) Legal Consequences of Peremptory Norms in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, James (2010) “International Crimes of States”, in The Law of International Responsibility, edited by Crawford et al, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie and Doswald-Beck, Louise (2009) Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd ed.
Hyun, Charles (2015) “The Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: Moving Toward Jus Cogens Status”, Southern California Law Review, Vol. 88, pp. 1463-1493.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander (2006) Peremptory Norms in International Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
Slye, Ronald C. & Van Schaack, Beth (2009) International Criminal Law: The Essentials, New York: Kluwer Law &​ Business.
Sévrine, Knuchel (2015) Jus Cogens: Identification and Enforcement of Peremptory Norms, Zurich: Schulthess.
Shelton, Danish (2002) “Righting Wrongs: Reparation in the Articles on State Responsibility”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 833-856.
Sicilanos, Lionos-Alexandre (2010) “Countermeasures in Response to Grave Violations of Obligations Owed to the International Community”, in The Law of International Responsibility, edited by Crawford et al, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sisilianos, Linos-Alexander (2002) “The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 1127-1145.
Tunkin, Grigory (1993) “Is General International Law Customary Law Only?”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 4, pp. 534–541.
Weatherall, Thomas (2015) Jus Cogens: International Law and Social Contract, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
Judgments and Advisory Opinions
ICJ (1970) Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1970, Separate. Opinion of Judge Ammoun.
ICJ (1971) Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1971.
ICJ (1996) Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996.
ICJ (1997) Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1997.
ICJ (2004) Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004.
ICJ (1996) Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996.
ICJ (1969) North Sea Continental Shelf, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1969.
ICTY (1999) Prosecutor v. Jelisić, Case No. IT-95-10-T, 14 December 1999, para. 60.
 
Documents
 Crawford, James (2000) Third Report on State Responsibility, Year Book of International Law Commission.
Ago, Robert (1976) Fifth Report on State Responsibility, Year Book of International Law Commission, Vol. 2, Part 1.
ILC (1966) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, New York: UN, vol. 2, Part 2.
ILC (2001) Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, UN Doc. (A/56/10).
ILC (2017) Second report on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens), A/CN.4/706.
ILC (2016) First report on jus cogens, 2016, A/CN.4/693.
ILC (2019) Fourth report on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens), 2019, A/CN.4/727.
ILC (2018) Third report on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens), 2018, A/CN.4/714.
Riphagen, Willem (1982) Third Report on State Responsibility, Year Book of International Law Commission, Vol. 2, Part 1.
United Nations (1993) Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction, Treaty Series, Vol. 1975.
United Nations (1969) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 23 May 1969, United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 1155.
ILC (2006) Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2006, Vol. 2, Part Two.
 
Internet sources and websites
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/hideous
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule74
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/280?OpenDocument
https://www.opcw.org/evolution-status-participation-convention
Obama Warns Syria Not to Cross “Red Line,” CNN, http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/20/world/meast/syria-unrest
http://www.un.org/sg/spokesperson/highlights/index.asp?HighD=9/16/2013
Borger, Julian, France Warns Syria of Forceful Response over Chemical Weapon Claims, GUARDIAN (Aug. 22, 2013), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/22/france-warns-syriaresponse-chemical (Last visited 22 March 2019). Gordon, Michael R., U.S. and Russia Reach Deal to Destroy Syria’s Chemical Arms, N.Y. TIMES (Sept. 15, 2013), http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/world/middleeast/syria-talks.html (Last visited 21 March 2019).
https://www.un.org/press/en/2013/sc11135.doc.htm

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics