Challenges of Implementing polluter pays principle in Iranian Clean Air Act

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Department of law, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

The present paper tries to take into account the polluter pays principle, to discuss challenges of civil liability of individuals under the Clean Air Act and to show how much this document, as a fundamental document in the air, suffers from deficiencies and gaps. Thus, the question has been answered: What is the challenges of implementing polluter pays principle in Iranian Clean Air Act 2017? Using descriptive-analytical method, these results are obtained, first; despite its long history and extensive jurisprudence and legal literature about the institution of ownership and property of jurisprudential principles, such as: principle of Non-Loss, but our legal and Jurisprudence traditions of immaterial property lacked a rich literature. The weakness, of course, was evident at the Clean Air Act which has failed because of the theoretical weakness and good legal mechanisms weakness about the public property. Secondly, to come over such a deficiency it seems that the foundation of the law needs to be reviewed concerning the concept of property (ownership and right) in the field of air. Thirdly, one cannot expect much from this Act, because the legislator discussed the phenomenon of public law (air) with the literature of private law.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1.  

    1. Birnie Patricia.W. and Alan Boyle (2000) International Law and the Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    2. Colls, Jeremy (2002) Air Pollution: Measurement, Modeling and Mitigation, Second Ed. UK: Spon Press.
    3. Craig, Robin Kundis (2009) “Valuing the Public Health Aspects of Environmental Enforcement: Qualitative Versus Quantitative Evaluations of Enforcement Effort”, Southern Illinois University Law Journal, Vol.33, pp. 403-436.
    4. Dannenmaier, Eric (2001) “Environmental Security and Governance in the Americas”, Canadian Foundation for the Americas, Available at SSRN 1078283.
    5. Lawrence, Cortez (1997) “Doing More with Less in Public Safety”, Innovative Governments: Creative Approaches to Local Problems, London: Praeger Publishers.
    6. Lippmann, Morton (2003) “Air Pollution and Health -Studies in the Americas and Europe”, pp. 35-48. In: Mc Granahan, Gordon & Murray, Frank (2003) Air Pollution and Health in Rapidly Developing Countries, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
    7. Maurice Sunkin, David Ong, Robert Wight (2002) Source Book on Environmental Law, Second Edition, London: Cavendish Publishing.
    8. Sands Philippe (2003) Principles of International Environmental Law, Cambridge University Press.
    9. Vaughn, Karen I. (1978) "John Locke and the Labor Theory of Value", Journal of Libertarian Studies, 2, No. 4, pp. 311-326.
    10. Yale University (2014) “Environmental performance Index 2014 Report Materials”, Online at: <http://epi.yale.edu/downloads> and also: <http://epi.yale.edu/epi/countryprofile/ Iran>. Last Visited: 12/10/2018.

    Documents

    1. Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy, Paris, 1960.
    2. Convention on Biological Diversity, Rio, 1992.
    3. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 1972.
    4. Framework Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Caspian Sea, Tehran - 2003.
    5. Kuwait Regional Convention for Co Operation on The Protection of the Marine Environment from Pollution, Kuwait, 1978.
    6. International Convention on Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co – Operation, (Oil Pollution Preparedness), London – 1990.
    7. OECD Council Recommendation on Guiding Principles Concerning the International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies, May 1972.
    8. Protocol Concerning Marine Pollution Resulting from Exploration and Exploitation of the Continental Shelf – Kuwait, 1989.
    9. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics