The genesis of the concept of the public affairs in Iranian constitutional movement

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Professor of Public Law, University of Tehran (Farabi College)

10.22099/jls.2020.30348.3042

Abstract

In the preceding years to Constitutional movement in Iran, the political thought was transferred from independent monarchy to constitutional monarchy due to the inability to govern the country. Therefore, the participation of people in public affairs was the ultimate way to survival and progression of the country in the constitutionalist thought. Moreover, the community and public (species) were recognized in debates. With respect to the advent of such unit, demand for participation in such generic, public unit was recognized. With the awakening and awareness of the public, the demand for participation in “the legislation and governance of respublica” was increased, being set as a “right and share”. In the aforementioned period of Iran’s Constitutionalism, and with respect to the advent of such new issue, a special category of law named Public Law was introduced as a new public law in Iran. In the present study, after explaining the first sign of advent of public and genre, and demand for participation in generic and public affairs, development of the concept was investigated as the origin of Public Law in Iran

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Albaret, Mélanie & et. al. (2014), A Twenty-First Century Concert of Powers; Promoting Great Power Multilateralism for the Post-Transatlantic Era. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF). avalible at; https://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/HSFK/hsfk_downloads/PolicyPaper_ATwentyFirstCenturyConcertofPowers.pdf
Cederman, Lars-Erik and Girardin, Luc (2010), Growing Sovereignty: Modeling the Shift
China and Russia: Facing Challenges of Global Shifts (April 4, 2017), Valdai Club Foundation. avalible at; https://valdaiclub.com/events/posts/articles/transformation-of-the-political-and-economic-world-around-us/
China and the World in the New Era (2019), avalible at; https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201909/27/content_WS5d8d80f9c6d0bcf8c4c142ef.html
Doran, Charles F. (1991), What is power cycle theory? Introducing the main concepts. Cambridge University Press.
Doran, C.F. (2012), Power Cycle Theory and the Ascendance of China: Peaceful or Stormy? SAIS Review of International Affairs, 32: 73-87.
Evstafiev, Dmitry (August 20, 2021), Five Hypotheses About the Future World. Modern Diplomacy. avalible at; https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2021/08/20/five-hypotheses-about-the-future-world/
Flockhart, Trine (2021), From ‘Westlessness’ to renewal of the liberal international order: whose vision for the ‘good life’ will matter?. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 35(2): 176-193.
from Indirect to Direct Rule. International Studies. 54(1): 27–48
Gordon, Philip H. (September 1, 2007), ‘Punish France, Ignore Germany, Forgive Russia’ No Longer Fits. The Brookings Institution. avalible at; https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/punish-france-ignore-germany-forgive-russia-no-longer-fits/
Gvosdev, Nikolas K. (September 22, 2020), Vladimir Putin's UN Speech: Will Russia Head A New Nonaligned Movement?. Center for the National Interest. avalible at; https://nationalinterest.org/feature/vladimir-putins-un-speech-will-russia-head-new-nonaligned-movement-169441
Haass, Richard (2022), The Dangerous Decade, A Foreign Policy for a World in Crisis. Foreign Affairs magazine. 101(5). avalibale at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/dangerous-decade-foreign-policy-world-crisis-richard-haass
Haass, Richard N. (November–December 2014), The Unraveling: How to Respond to a Disordered World. Foreign Affairs. 93(6): 70–79.
Harkavy, Robert E. (1999), Long cycle theory and the hegemonic powers' basing networks. Political Geography. 18(8): 941–972.
Hebron, Lui; James, Patrick (1997), Great powers, cycles of relative capability and crises in world politics. International Interactions. 23(2); 145–173.
Heim, Jacob L. (2009), New International Players: A traditional and non-traditional look. The SAIS Review of International Affairs. 29(2): 113-127.
Ikenberry, G. John (1998-1999), Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of American Postwar Order. International Security. 23(3): 43–78.
Ikenberry, G. John (2018), Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive. International Affairs. 31(1): 17-29.
Interim National Security Strategic Guidance (2021), avalible at; https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf
Kirkham, Ksenia (2016), The formation of the Eurasian Economic Union: How successful is the Russian regional hegemony? Journal of Eurasian Studies. 7(2): 111-128.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics