The Role of The Martens Clause in Codification and Criminalization of International Crimes

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Law Department, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan,

2 Ph.D. in Public International Law, Islamic Azad University. Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The Martens Clause is undoubtedly one of the fundamental provisions of contemporary legal order of the international community. In addition to other areas of international law, international criminal law has been an arena for the presence and objective impact of the Martens Clause and its constituent elements.The formulation of the Martens Clause of the principle of humanity and the requirements of public conscience as a determining point for entry into the international law documents, has formed part of the idea of international crimes, because these two related elements that are threatened by the commission of crimes, are an important part of the protected areas which justifies the existence of a crime under international criminal law. this article shows how the principle of humanity and public conscience resulting from the Martens Clause have played a role in the codification and formation of international crimes, especially crimes against humanity and genocide. Following the legal doctrine, international documents and jurisprudence, we conclude that by legal acceptance and an extensive and protective judicial interpretation of criminal court, the Clause has played a key role in criminalizing international crimes and attacks on human values. In fact, the culmination of the Clause in international criminal law has been manifested in filling legal gaps,combating impunity,immunity of perpetrators in international arena, and prosecuting those who violate human values

Keywords

References

  • Allen, Charles A. (1989) ‘‘Civilian Starvation and Relief During Armed Conflict: The Modern Humanitarian Law’’, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol.19, No.1, pp.1-85.
  • Askin, Kely (1997) War Crimes Against Women: Prosecution in International War Crimes Tribunals, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Atadjanov, Rustam (2019) ‘‘Humanness as a Protected Legal Interest of Crimes Against Humanity: Conceptual and Normative Aspect’’, Springer, International Criminal Justice Series, Vol.22.
  • Cooper, Belinda. (1999) War Crimes: The Legacy of Nuremberg, New York: TV Books.
  • Bassiouni, Cherif M. (2011) Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary application, Cambridge.
  • Bassiouni, Cherif M. (1999) Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law, Cambridge MA: Kluwer Law International.
  • Cassese, Antonio (2000) “The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?”, European Journal of International Law, EJIL, Vol.11, No.1, pp.187-216.
  • De Guzman, Margaret (2000) “The Road from Rome: The Developing Law of Crimes Against Humanity”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.22, No.2, pp.335-403.
  • Farer, Tom (2000) Restraining the Barbarians: Can International Criminal Law Help? Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1, pp.90-117.
  • Nelayeva G. (2008) Development of Treaties Concerning Punishment of Individuals for Unlawful Acts of War Committed by Individuals in International Law.
  • Greppi, Edoardo (1999) The Evolution of Individual Criminal Responsibility Under International Law, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol.81, No.835, pp.531-552.
  • Shamsey, John (2002) “Comment: 80 Years Too Late: The International Criminal Court and the 20th Century's First Genocide”, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Vol.11, No.2, pp.327-383.
  • Jorgensen, Nina B. (2000) The Responsibility of the States for International Crime, Oxford.
  • Kriangsak, Kittichaisaree (2001) International Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Glauner, Lindsay (2002) “The Need for Accountability and Reparation: 1830–1976. The United States Government's Role in the Promotion, Implementation, and Execution of the Crime of Genocide Against Native Americans”, Depaul Law Review, Vol.51, No.3, pp.911-962.
  • Lingen, Kerstin (2016) Fulfilling the Martens Clause: Debating Crimes Against Humanity in: Fabian Klose/ Mirjam Thulin (eds), Humanity – A History of European Concepts in Practice from the 16th Century to the Present, Göttingen.
  • Lippman, Matthew (1997) “Crimes against Humanity”, Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol.17, Issue.2, pp171-274.
  • Lippman, Matthew (2000) “Humanitarian Law: War on Women”, Michigan State University DCL Journal of International Law, Vol.9, Issue.1, pp.33-120.
  • Meron, Theodor (1995) “International Criminalization of Internal Atrocities”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.89, Issue.3, pp.554-577.
  • Meron, Theodor (2006) “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law”, The Hague Academy of International Law Monographs (Vol.3), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherland.
  • Meron, Theodor (1998) War Crimes Law Comes of Age: Essays, Oxford.
  • Meron, Theodor (2000) “The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity and Dictates of Public Conscience”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.94, No.1, pp.78-89.
  • Mettraux, Guenaei (2008) Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Oliveira Biazatti, Bruno (2016), ‘‘The Martens Clause: A Study of its Function and Meaning’’, CEDIN, Centro de Direito Internacional, pp.1- 43.
  • Orentlicher,F. (1998) “The Law of Universal Conscience, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity”, Conference paper presented to the ‘Committee on Conscience Conference, USHMM.
  • Pictet, Jean (1985) Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  • Pictet, Jean (1979) “The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: Commentary”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 19, Issue.210, pp.130-149.
  • Jackson, Robert (1945) ‘Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials,’ Washington DC: Dep’t of State.
  • Ratner, Steven; Jason Abrams & James Bischoff (1997) Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law, Oxford University Press.
  • Salter, Michael; Eastwood, Meggi (2011) ‘‘Post-war Developments of the Martens Clause: The Codification of Crimes Against Humanity Applicable to Acts of Genocide’’, International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol.2, pp.250-280.
  • Sarkin, Jeremy (2007) “The Historical Origins, Convergence and Interrelationship of International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, International Criminal Law and International Law”, Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, Vol.1, No.1, pp.125-172.
  • Sarkin, Jeremy, (2009) “The Origins of International Criminal Law: Its Connection to and Convergence with other Branches of International Law”, Hague Justice Journal, 4, Issue.1, pp.5-41.
  • Schwelb, Egon (1946) Crimes against Humanity, British Year Book of International Law, Vol.178, No.23, pp.178-226.
  • Teson, Fernando R. (1997) Humanitarian International: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, New York, Transnational Publishers, Inc.
  • Trindade, Cançado “(2013) “Some Reflections on the Principle of Humanity in Its Wide Dimension”, in Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (eds. R. Kolb and G. Gaggioli), Cheltenham, E. Elgar.
  • Van Schaack, Beth (1999) “The Definition of Crimes Against Humanity: Resolving the Incoherence”, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, Vol.37, pp.787-850.
  • Veuthey, Michel (2003) Public Conscience in International Humanitarian action, Refugee Quarterly, Vol.22, No.4, pp. 197-224.
  • Weeramantry, C. (2004) Universalising International Law, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

 

- Documents & Cases 

  • Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land, The Hague,
  • Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, GA Res. 260(III) A,
  • Corfu Channel case (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Albania), ICJ, 1949.
  • First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, 8 June 1977.
  • GA Resolution 96(1), 11 December 1946.
  • ICTR, J. Kambanda The Prosecutor, 1998.
  • ICTR, O. Serushago The Prosecutor, 1999.
  • ICTR, Prosecutor v Kayishema, Trial Chamber II 21 May 1999.
  • ICTR, Prosecutor v. Jean-Paul Akayesu ICTR, Trial Chamber, 2 September 1998.
  • Inter-American Court of Human Rights, case of the Massacre of Plan de Sánchez versus Guatemala, Merits, 2004, Separate Opinion of Judge A.A. Cançado Trindade.
  • Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No.10, 1949.
  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Rep, Advisory Opinion, 1996.
  • Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. US), ICJ Rep, 1986.
  • NMTs, United States v. Karl Brandt, 1947, Case 1 (Medical Case).
  • Prosecutor v Drazen Erdemović, ICTY, 1996, IT-96-22-T.
  • Prosecutor Krstic¨, ICTY (Trial Chamber), 2001.
  • Prosecutor Kuprezkic¨et al., ICTY (Trial Chamber), 2000.
  • Prosecutor v. Milan Martic, ICTY, 8 March 1996.
  • Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, ICJ Advisory Opinion,, 28 May 1951.
  • Revised and Updated Report on the Question of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Prepared by Mr. B. Whitaker. (E/CN.4/Sub.2/416).
  • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, opened for signature 17 July 1998, 2187 UNTS 90 (entered into force 1 July 2002).
  • United States v. Alfred Krupp et al., 15 Ann. Dig. 620, 622 (U.S. Mil. Trib. 1948).1 IMT.
  • United States Josef Altstoetter, 4 NMT 733, Washington DC, 1949, Vol. II.

 

Journal of Legal Studies
Volume 14, Issue 4 - Serial Number 46
January 2023
Pages 253-288

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics