Abramowicz, Michael B. (2005) ”A Theory of Copyright's Derivative Right and Related Doctrines”, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 2.
Afori,Orit Fischman (2007) “Copyright Infringement without Copying - Reflections on the Thcberg Case”, Ottawa Law Review, Vol. 39, No.1, pp.1-57.
Cabrera Blázquez F.J. Cappello M. Fontaine G. Valais S. (2017) “Exceptions and limitations to copyright, IRIS Plus “, Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
Goldstein,Paul (1983) “Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright”, 30 J. COPYRIGHT SOC’Y U.S.A. 209.
Geller, Paul Edward (2010) “A German Approach to Fair Use: Test Cases for TRIPS Criteria For Copyright Limitations?”, Journal of the Copyright Society of the U SA, Vo l. 57, pp.553-571.
Masouyé, Claude (1978) “Guide to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Paris Act, 1971)”, Genève: Published by the World Intellectual Property Organization.
McCutcheon, Jani (2019)
“Making Art From Words: The Picturisation Adaptation Right In Copyright Law” (May 17, 2019). The Research Handbook on Art and Law ed. Jani McCutcheon and Fiona McGaughey, forthcoming 2019, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3389634.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374580 Last visited: 2020/07/10).pp.1-18.
Rennie, Douglas Campbell (2014) “This Book Is a Movie: The 'Faithful Adaptation' as a Benchmark for Analyzing the Substantial Similarity of Works in Different Media” (March 30, 2014). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, pp.1-44.
Samuelson, Pamela (1993) “Fair Use for Computer Programs and Other Copyrightable Works in Digital Form: the Implications of Sony, Galoob and Sega” 1 J. Intell. Prop. L. 49.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/jipl/vol1/iss1/6
Samuelson, Pamela (2017) “Justifications for Copyright Limitations & Exceptions” (February 10, 2015). The chapter in Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions, Ruth Okediji (ed.), Cameridge University Press.
Documents
WTO (2000) “Article 13 TRIPS was considered by a Panel established by the WTO Dispute Resolution Body in the United States – Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act” - WT/DS160/R - 15 June 2000. Avaliable at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/1234da.pdf. (Last visited: 2020/05/05).
EPRS, European Parliamentary Research Service (2018) “COPYRIGHT LAW IN THE EU:
WIPO (2003), “Guide To The Copyright And Related Rights Treaties Administered By WIPO And Glossary Of copyright And Related Rights Terms”. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=361&plang=EN.. (Last visited: 2020/05/10).
Cases
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
Corte di Cassazione (Italian Supreme Court), Section 1, No 14635/2018 [6 June 2018]
Dyason v Autodesk (1989) 24 FCR 147, 155 (Lockhart 1).
Estate of Hogarth v. Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc (United States District Court, SD New York 15 March 2002) No. 00 CIV 9569 (DLC) [3].
Feist Publications, inc. v. Rural Telephone service co. 499 U.S. 340 (1991).
Idema v. Dreamworks, Inc. 162 F. Supp. 2d 1129 (C.D. Cal. 2001)
Jeff Koons v Franck Davidovici (‘Fait d’hiver’), CA Paris 23 February 2021 n° 19/09059
Martin v. Polyplas Manufacturers Ltd [1969] N.Z.L.R. 1046 (New Zealand: Supreme Court(
)