Procedure of Hearing AntiCompetitive Agreements and Sufficient Strategy for Countering its Deteriorated Traces

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

law Department, Azad University, Law University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Controlling markets needs strategies for hearing and countering anti-competitive procedures. This purpose never happen, without satisfacted regulotions. Sufficient procedure of hearing anti-competitive agreements, can be regarded as rout for countering actions by competition authorities. If these hearing use in suitable ways, they may have satisfacted effects. Be side satisfacted procedure, effective reactions for obligating its deteriorated traces; is the other concern. Today every countries are seeking to plan the best policy which anti-competitive ruined effects. Doubtless uses absolutely observation and emploies monotonous approach, impress undesirable in markets. Accordingly for conforting to infringer companies should be attended their situations in markets in the way that reactions doesn’t decreas market potential.

Keywords

References

Hunter, Alex (1966) Competition and The Law, Londo: Allen and Unwin.
American Bar Association (2006) Antitrust Law and Economics, Washington D,C: ABA Pres.
 Rosado Cubero, Ana (2010) Barriers to Competition, New York: Routledge.
 Nussbaum, Andrew (2012) Merger and Acquisitions, New York: Thomson Routers.
Antitrust Law Institute (1979) Antitrust Law, New York: Practising Law Institute.
Bael, Van (2005) Competition Law of the European Community, Neatherlands: Kluwer Law.
Baggash, Ameen (2012) Merger and Acquisition Laws, London: Brunel University Press.
Barry, Rodger (2009) Competition Law and Policy in EC and UK, New York: Routledge.
Barry,Hawk (2009) International Antitrust Law and Policy, New York: Juris Publishing.
Battista, Giovanni (2012) Handbook of Research on Competitive Strategy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Berge, Wendell (2000) Cartels, Washington D.C: Bread Books.
Bill, Snow (2011) Merger and Acquisitions, New York: Wiley Publishing.
Botta, Marco (2011) Merger Control Regimes in Emerging Economies, Netherlands: Woiters Kluwer.
Broder, Douglas (2012) U.S Antitrust Law And Enforcement, Oxford: Oxford University Press,
Cassimon, Bruno (2006) Merger and Acquisitions, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Colino, Marco Sandra (2008) Competition Law of EU and Uk, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Csongor, Istvan (2013) EU and US Competition Law, New York: Routledge.
Dale, Oesterle (2001) Merger and Acquisitions, New York: Thomson West.
 Dae Martin, David (1959) Mergers and Clyton Act, California: University of California Press.
Kenneth, Diplock (1964) “Antitrust and the Judicial Process”, The Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.7, Available at: http:// www.Jstor.org,Last visited at:2017/2/1.
Eleanor, Mfox & Michael, J Trebilcock (2013) The Design of Competition Law Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ezrachi, Ariel (1395) EU Competition Law, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Giorgio, Monti (2007) EC Competition Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, Sullivan; Warren, Grimes (2006) The Law of Anti Trust, New York: Thomson West.
Letwin, William (1965) Law and Economic Policy in America, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
NavaroVarona, Edurne (2005) Merger Control in The European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliver Mackenrodt, Mark (2008) Abuse of Domain Position, Munich: Springer.
Werner, Ray (1967) “Legal Developments in Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.31, No.2, pp. 70-81.
Soebhaenullah Khan, Muhammad (1992) Regulation and Control of Monopolies and Restrictive Trade, New Dlhi: Practices, Royal Book co.
William, Lee (2017) The Law of Public Communication, New York: Routledge.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics