The Roles of Independence Principle and Preferential Transfers in Tension between Documentary Credit and Bankruptcy: With a Focus on the U.S. Case Law

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Allameh Tabataba'i

Abstract

The insolvency of the applicant in documentary credit transactions could lead to complexity and tension between laws of documentary credit and bankruptcy. The question posed here is: What are the effects of the insolvency of the applicant on rights and obligations of the issuer and the beneficiary? This is a significant question which results in creating a conflict and tension between the principle of independence in letter of credit and preferential transfers in bankruptcy in the event that the applicant becomes bankrupt. To deal with this problem, general principles in the field of commerce, such as efficiency and reinforcement of credit, could be taken into account. On this basis, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of independence; nevertheless, this principle should not be given a weight beyond principles of commerce. This article aims to examine situations in which the above-mentioned tension is raised by placing a particular emphasis on the U.S. case law. It would seem that in the case of standby letter of credit, the applicant’s insolvency could lead the issuer, depending on circumstances, to be reluctant to honour the letter of credit and pay it to the beneficiary.

Keywords

References

Dolan, John F. (2015) "Insolvency in Letter of Credit Transaction", The Banking Law Journal, No. 06, pp.195-203

Duggan, Anthony & Telfer, Thomas G.W. (2007) "Canadian Preference Law Reform", Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 42, pp. 661-684.

Farnsworth,Ward (2007) The Legal Analyst: A Toolkit for Thinking About the Law , Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fellinger, Grec A. (1990) "Letter of Credit: The Autonomy Principle and the Fraud Exeption”, Journal of Banking & Fianance Law and Practice, Vol. 662, No. 4, pp. 43- 61.
McLaughlin, Gerald T. (2002) "Exploring Boundaries: A Legal and Structural Analysis of the Independence Principle of Letter of Credit Law", Banking Law Journal, Vol. 119, No. 6, pp.501-522.
Giampieri, Alberto & Nardulli, Giovanni (1993) "Inforceability of International Documantry Letter of Credit, An Italian Perspective", International Lawyer, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.1013-1027.
Gray Carlson, David (1999) "Letter of Credit, Violabale Preferences and the Independence Principle”, Business Lawyer, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp.1661-1736.
Greif, Avner (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, First Published.
Beatty, Jeffry F. & Samuelson, Susan S. & Bredeson, Dean A. (2013) Introduction in Business Law, South-Western college, Cengage Learning.
kull . Andrew (2008) "Restitution and Final Payment", Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp.667-687.
Lawrence, R Ahern & et al (2004) Automatic Stay: Violations, Remedies and Sanctions, Greenbaum Doll & McDonald PLLC.
Pasner, Richard A. (2007) Economic Analysis of Law, New York: Aspen Publishers.
Rodenberg, James A. (19991) "Letter of Credit in Bankruptcy, Can the Independence Doctrine Survive Performance Attack", Commercial Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 4 pp. 431-452.
Gross, Steven R. & Borowitz, Peter L. (1986) "A New Twist on Twist Cap: Invalidating a Preferential Letter of Creditin In Re Air Conditioning", Banking Law Journal, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 368-378.
Schutze, Rolf A. & Fontane, Gabriele (2001) Documentary Credit Law through the World, Paris, ICC Publishing S.A. ICC Publication.
Mclaughlin, Gerald T. (1982) "Letter of Credit as Preferential Transfers in Bankruptcy", Fordham law Review, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp. 1033-1083.
White, James J. (1996) "Right of Subrogation in Letter of Credit Transaction", Louis Univercity Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 47-74.
 
Cases
Guy C. Long, Inc. v. Dependable Ins, Co (In re Guy C. Long Inc, 1987).
North Shore & Cent III Freight Co. v. American Nat'l Bank & Trust Co (In re North Shore & Cent III Freight Co. 1983).
Page v. First Nat'l Bank (In Re Page), 18 Bankr, 713, 715 (D.C. Cir, 1982).
Armstrong v. FNB Fianancial Co, (In Re Clothes, Inc), 35 Bankr, 487, 489 (Bankr D.N.D 1983).
American Bank v. Leasing Service Corp(In Re Air Conditioning Inc)845, F 2d 293(11th).
Kellogg v. Blue Quail Energy Inc. (In Re Compton), 831 F 2d 586 (5 th Cir. 1987).
In Re MJ Sales & Distrib. Co, 25 Bankr. 608, 614 (Bankr S.D.N.Y 1982).
In Re Mead, Inc, 42, Bankr. 57, 60, 61 (Bankr N.D Ohio 1984).
Jet Florida inc V. American Air Line.
Twist Cap Inc v. Southeast Bank of Tampa. (1979).
Kellogg v. Blue Quail Energy, Inc. (In re Compton Corp), (1987).
Journal of Legal Studies
Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 38
January 2021
Pages 269-302

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics