From legal responsibility of states to their ethical responsibility in the context of climate change

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor in International Law at Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz ,Iran.

Abstract

Climate change is one of the problems resulting from increasing greenhouse gas emissions. To solve this problem, the climate change regime, including Framework Convention (1992), Kyoto Protocol (1997) and Paris Agreement (2015) with obligations to the gradual decrease of greenhouse gas emissions have been created. Due to lack of lex Specialis on international responsibility inthe matters of climate change, general rules of international responsibility are applicable to any international wrongful acts of states and compensation for damages suffered by victim states. However this study indicates the system cannnot prove the element of  due to uncertainty in causality. Therefore, it faces a challenge in regard to breach of obligation element, because of lack of unconditional obligation in prohibition of emissions; and finally the system faces ambiguity in compensation, because of subjective excluding of compensation especially in Paris Agreement. Consequently, state responsibility is inefficient in the context of climate change and recent developments in this area emphasie ethical responsibility in energy consumption to rectify the relative inefficiency of legal responsibility.
 
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Abdollahi , Mohsen; Saeide Moarefi, »The Principle Of Common But Differentiated Responsibility In International Environmental Law«, Public Studies , 2010(Issue 29)(In Persian)

  2. Atabi , Farideh; Mehrdad Nazemi; Amir Abbas Sedighi; Narmin Tavakoli,»Investigation On Regulations And Commitments Of The Climate Change Convention And Assessment Of Their Implementation In The Islamic Republic Of Iran« ,Article 13, Volume 12, Issue 2, Summer 2010 ,(In Persian)

  3. Bodansky, Daniel and Sandra Day, »The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A New Hope? « , American Journal of International Law, Volume 110, Issue 2 , 2016.

  4. Bodansky, Daniel, »The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement, Review of European«, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Volume 25, Issue, 2016.

  5. Burleson, Elizabeth, »Paris Agreement and Consensus to Address Climate Challenge«, American Society of International Law, Volume: 20, Issue: 8, 2016.

  6.  Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC), Kyoto Protocol, Reference Manual on Accounting of Emissions and Assigned Amount, 2008.

  7. Doelle, Meinhard, »The Paris Climate Agreement – Assessment of Strengths and Weaknesses«, in Klein et al, The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2017)

  8. Epiney, Astrid, »Environmental refugees: aspects of the law of State responsibility«, in: Etienne Piguet Antoine Pécoud Paul de Guchteneire (Hrsg.), Migration and Climate Change, )Cambridge university press, 2011(

  9. Happold, Matthew, »The relationship between the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and other rules of public international law, in particular on States’ responsibility for the adverse effects of climate change«, Legal Response Initiative,2013.

  10. kralj, Larisa, »State Responsibility and the Environment« ,LL.M. Paper for the Maters of Law in the European Law, University of Gent,2014.

  11. Mayer, Benoit and Mikko Rajavuori, »National Fossil Fuel Companies and Climate Change Mitigation under International Law«, Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol 55, issue1, 2016.

  12.  Mayer, Benoit, »Climate Change Reparations and the Law and Practice of State Responsibility«, Asian Journal of International Law, Volume 7, Issue 1, 2016.

  13. Mousavi, Sayed Fazlollah Fahimeh Ghiyasian,»Reparation Of Environment Damages In International Law« , Law Quarterly, Article 19, Volume 41, Issue 1, Spring 2012. (In Persian)

  14. Mousavi, Seyed Fazllolah, Alireza Arashpour, »The Principle of Prevention in International Environmental Law«, 2015(Issue 2). (In Persian)

  15. Obergasse, Wolfgang, Mersmann, Hermann E. Ott, and Hanna Wang-Helmreich Wuppertal, »Phoenix from the Ashes - An Analysis of the Paris Agreement to the United nations Framework Convention on Climate«, Change, Wuppertal, 01 March 2016.

  16. Pourkhaghan Shahrezaie, Zeynab, »International Responsibility For Environmental Damages«,  Comprative Law,2017 (Issue 1). (In Persian)

  17. Redgwell, Catherine, »The Practice of Shared Responsibility in relation to Energy, Amsterdam Center for International Law«, SHARES Research Paper, 96, 2016.

  18. Rosenblom, Ann-Charlotte, »Claiming State Responsibility for Climate Change Damages«, Master thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Lund, 2009.

  19. Savaresi, Annalisa, »the Paris Agreement: Reflections on an International Law Odyssey«, Esil Conference Paper Series, Vol. 8, No 7, 2001.

  20. Singh, Margaretha Wewerinke,»State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations Associated with Climate Change«, In: Sébastien Jodoin, Sébastien Duyck and Alyssa Johl (eds)Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance, (Routledge, 2017).

  21. Spence, David B., »Corporate Social Responsibility in the Oil and Gas Industry: The Importance of Reputational Risk«, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Volume 86, Issue 1, 2010.

  1. Tol, Richard S.J and RodaVerheyen, »State responsibility and compensation for climate change damages: a legal and economic assessment«, Energy Policy, Volume 32, Issue 9, 2004.

  1. Vafadar, Ali, »Obligations and Responsibility of States in Protection of Environment, Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology«, Volume 9, Issue 4, winter 2008. (In Persian)

  2. Vanhala, Lisa and Cecilie Hestbaek, »Framing Climate Change Loss and Damage in UNFCCC Negotiations: The Struggle over Meaning and the Warsaw International Mechanism«, Global Environmental Politics, Volume 16, Issue 4, 2016.

  3. Verheyen, Roda and Peter Roderick, »The legal duty to pay compensation for climate change«, Climate Change Programme, discussion paper, November 2008.

  4. Voigt, Christina, »State Responsibility for Climate Change Damages«, Nordic Journal of International Law, Volume 77, Issue 1, 2008.

  5.  World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST), ethical implications of world global change, Report, UNESCO, 2010.

     

    Documents:

  1. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, Report of the ILC on the Work of its Fifty-third Session, UN GAOR, 56th Sess, Supp No 10, p 43, UN Doc A/56/10, 2001.

  2. ICJ, Advisory Opinion, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 1996.

  3. ICJ Reports, Gabčíkovo-Nagyamaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), 1997.

  4. ICJ, Corfu Channel Case, United Kingdom v Albania, British Memorial, 1949.

  5. Supreme Court of The United States, Massachusetts, Et Al., Petitioners V. Environmental Protection Agency Et Al., Washington, D. C. 20543, April 2, 2007.

  6. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997.

  7. The Paris Agreement on climate change, 2015.

  8. Warsaw international mechanism for loss and damage associated with climate change impacts, 2013.

  9. UNESCO, Declaration of Ethical Principles In Relation To Climate Change, 2017.

  10. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1992.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Journal of Legal Studies
Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 28
October 2018
Pages 105-133

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics