The trial of defendant through video conferencing

Document Type : Research Paper

10.22099/jls.2015.3034

Abstract

Abstract
Intering technology, made some challenges in all areas of the justice system. One of these challenges is a remote procedure that can be used in areas such as remote testify, remote defendant and … In this paper, recent field survey approach doctrins of common law, Fegh and iranian law have been considered. reducing costs and expedition of process is the result of internig technology that is in front of these principles of proceeding. This paper particularly with regard to exposure confrontation clause is important in the area of virtual proceedings or in other areas.
 

Keywords


منابع
الف. فارسی
آخوندی، محمد(1369). آئین دادرسی کیفری، جلد دوم، تهران:  انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی.
آشوری، محمد(1376). عدالت کیفری (مجموعه مقالات)، تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش.
امیدی، جلیل(1383). دکتر آشوری و حقوق دفاعی متهم، علوم جنایی (مجموعه مقالات در تجلیل از استاد دکتر محمد آشوری)، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
قرجه‌لو، علیرضا(1386)، پایان­نامه دکترای حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی با موضوع امارات و قرائن در حقوق کیفری ایران و انگلیس به راهنمایی دکتر حسین میرمحمدصادقی، تهران: دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
گلدوزیان، ایرج(1377)، بایسته­های حقوق جزای عمومی، تهران: نشر میزان.
 
ب. عربی
طوسی، محمدبن حسن(1351)، المبسوط فی فقه الامامیه، تحقیق: محمد باقر بهبودی: بی جا: مکتبه المرتضویه.
کلینی، محمدبن یعقوب (1367)، الکافی، تحقیق: علی اکبر غفاری، الطبعه الثالثه، طهران: دارالکتاب الاسلامیه.
نجفی، محمد حسن (1398)، جواهر الکلام فی شرح شرائع الاسلام، تحقیق: شیخ عباس قوچانی، الطبعه السادسه، طهران: دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
 
ج. لاتین
Argyle (1988), Bodily communication, 2nd edition: Published in USA, Methuen & co.LTD.31-122
Bowen Poulin, Anne (2006-2007)," Strenthening the Criminal Defendant,s Right to Counsel", Cardozo Law Review. Vol 28: 1110-1152
Bowen Poulin, Anne (2003- 2004), "Criminal Justice and Videoconferencing Technology: Remote Defendant", Tulane Law Review. Vol 78: 151
Brian, Murray (2009-2010), "confronting religion: veiled Muslim witnesses and the confrontation clause",:Notre dame law review. vol 85: 1728-1729
David Blanck, Peter (1985-1986), "The Appearance of Justice: Judges  Verbal  and Nonverbal Behavior in Criminal Jury Trials", Stanford Law Review. Vol 38: 89
Friedman, Richard (2001- 2002),"Remote Testimony", University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Vol 35: 697
Gertner, nancy (2003 – 2004), "Videoconferencing: Learning Through Screens", William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, vol 12: 786
Haas, Aron (2006-2007), "Videoconferencing in Immigration Proceeding", Pierce Law Review ,Vol 5: 70
Lederer, Feredric (1998- 1999),"The Road to the Virtual Courtroom?  A Consideration A Consideration of Today's  - and Tomorrow's – High- Technology Courtroom",  south Carolina law review. Vol 50: 801,803
Levan, Elizabeth (1984), "Nonverbal Communication in the Courtroom: Attorney Beware", Law & Psychology Review. Vol 8: 91,92,94
Olson, Christine (2007-2008), "Accusations from Abroad: Testimony of Unavailable Witnesses via Live Two-Way Videoconferencing does not Violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment", University of California Davis Law Review. Vol 41: 1677
Ponte, Lucille (2002- 2003), "The Michigan Cyber Court: a Bold Experiment in the Development of the First Public Virtual Courthouse", North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology. Vol 4: 61
 
Rocha, Michael (2006-2007), "Going too far in United States v. Yates: The Eleventh Circuit's Application of Maryland v. Craig to Tow-Way Videoconferencing", Stetson Law Review. Vol 36: 372
Riehl, Ryan (2004), Double Talking the Right to Counsel, Wayne Law Review. Vol 50:1027
Shoretz, Rochelle (1995), "Let the Record Show: Modifying Appellate Review Procedures for Errors of Prejudicial, Nonverbal Communication by Trial Judges", Columbia Law Review. Vol 95: 1273
Treadway, Molly and Wiggins, Elizabeth (2006), "Videoconferencing in Criminal Proceedings: Legal and Empirical Issues and Direction for Research", Law and Policy. Vol 28: 215