2
دانشجو دکترای حقوق بین الملل سرمایه گذاری، دانشگاه پاریس ،1 سوربن
10.22099/jls.2014.1914
Abstract
Interim and conservatory measures are special legal entities which have specific functions in the domestic law, but in international public law, it is not explicitly mentioned and its availability as a binding procedure is unknown. The reason for such difference between domestic law and international public law is the text of art. 41 of the statute of international court of justice and art. 91 of the UN charter which are both unclear in stating this procedure as an enforceable one. In this article, in order to make a clarification of this classical procedure, we are going to make a comparative consideration among other branches of international law specifically international trade law to show how these types of measure are treated in practice.
Safaee, S. H. and Dadras, P. (2014). Enforceability or unenforceability of interim and conservatory
measures issued by international court of justice. Journal of Legal Studies, 5(3), 141-160. doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.1914
MLA
Safaee, S. H. , and Dadras, P. . "Enforceability or unenforceability of interim and conservatory
measures issued by international court of justice", Journal of Legal Studies, 5, 3, 2014, 141-160. doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.1914
HARVARD
Safaee, S. H., Dadras, P. (2014). 'Enforceability or unenforceability of interim and conservatory
measures issued by international court of justice', Journal of Legal Studies, 5(3), pp. 141-160. doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.1914
CHICAGO
S. H. Safaee and P. Dadras, "Enforceability or unenforceability of interim and conservatory
measures issued by international court of justice," Journal of Legal Studies, 5 3 (2014): 141-160, doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.1914
VANCOUVER
Safaee, S. H., Dadras, P. Enforceability or unenforceability of interim and conservatory
measures issued by international court of justice. Journal of Legal Studies, 2014; 5(3): 141-160. doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.1914