<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<ags:resources xmlns:ags="http://purl.org/agmes/1.1/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:agls="http://www.naa.gov.au/recordkeeping/gov_online/agls/1.2" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[The Insured's Post-Contract Duty of Notification of Increase of Risk: Comparative study  in Iranian, Chinese insurance law and  principles of European insurance contracts]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Amini, Mansour]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Hazeghi Aghdam, Mohammadreza]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[increase of risk]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[duty to notify]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[realization conditions]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[philosophy of duty]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Risk management in insurance contract is very important due to the continuous and onerous nature of such a contract. Considering the importance of risk management in insurance contracts; insurance law systems have established institutions for managing such a risk. Warranties in common law and the alteration or increase of risk in the civil law countries are the institutions which assist the insurer to control risk increase. However, benefiting from such right requires the insured’s subordinate duty to inform the insurer about the increased risk. The question that come to mind in this regard is: what are the conditions of establishment and the sanction for breaching this duty? In this respect, the insurer's obligation must be determined in a way that it does not entail the imposition of the burdensome obligation on him and meanwhile, it must be determined by considering the degree of insured’s fault and proper application of causal connection.  By using descriptive-analytical method in line with explaining insured’s duty to notify, realization conditions of this duty, and sanctions of breaching such a duty; this article is seeking to provide a proper sanction template in order to modify the bugs and eliminate deficiencies in the Iranian insurance act and regulations of Supreme Insurance Council.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6096_b783f6aace5bb680326b248932f46a93.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.35815.3719]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the ratio of  the Principle of Necessity and the Principle of Proportionality in the Realm of Limitation and Suspension of Human Rights]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[hajimolla, hiva]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Mohammadi, Aghil]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[International human rights law]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the principle of proportionality]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the principle of necessity]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the limitation and suspension of human rights]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[state of public emergency]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the European Convention on Human Rights]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[Necessity and proportionality are among the most widely used principles in international human rights law, their relationship is not very clear, the present article after explaining the concept and position of the mentioned principles in the scope of international human rights Rules, it measures the ratio of each of them to each other in a four-way relationship. based on the approach of the “International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” and the “European Convention on Human Rights”, the principles in the field of limitation and suspension of human rights are compared. the question is when a human right is restricted or suspended, In order to preserve the nature and essence of that right, which of these two principles should be given priority? despite the lack of consensus among the regulatory bodies of the two documents, it appears in time of public emergency and the suspension of the right by the state, the principle of necessity should be used as a criterion in the concept of "less intrusive means". since the basis of the principle of proportionality and the interpretation of the principle of necessity in its shadow, increases the discretion of the state in suspending rights and intensifies the risk of slipping into the trap of utilitarianism, applying the principle of necessity can prevent this damage to a great extent.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6087_d82080bee33915dda150e9567304c590.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.38517.4077]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Application of philosophical hermeneutics in the gender attitude on mother retaliation against child murder]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Hasan zadeh, Negin]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[ساداتی, سیدمحمدجواد]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Javan Jaafari, Abdolreza]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Different kind of reading from penal theory of Sharia]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Philosophical hermeneutics]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[gender attitude]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Qisas of mother]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Historical perception]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The social system is a structure that consists of several kind of subsystems that have interaction with each other’s. The value and normative system of a subsystem, affects the values of other subsystems. For example, norms and values of economical subsystem has deep relation on penal subsystem. Moreover, function of penal subsystem is protecting from the normative structure of other subsystems. One of the most important effect of this relation between penal subsystem and other social subsystem is the influence of gender attitude that exist on the other social subsystem. When the economical subsystem is on the effects of gender attitudes, naturally penal subsystem will also affected by this gender attitudes. Distinction between penal rules of female gender and male gender in penal jurisprudence is because of this gender attitudes on the other social subsystems.  Keywords: Different kind of reading from penal theory of Sharia, Philosophical hermeneutics, gender attitude, Qisas of mother, Historical perception]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6091_37fedb5d05c88d1ab24a0891f164eccd.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2021.37907.3990]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[The principle of openness of civil proceedings]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[heidari, sirus]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[hamidian, hamid]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[The principle of openness of the trial]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[civil proceedings]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[fair trial]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[judicial transparency]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The principle of openness of the proceedings is one of the fundamental principles governing the types of proceedings that are considered human rights and is one of the important components in the realization of a fair trial. However, in criminal matters, the principle of openness of the proceedings and related issues has been considered to a considerable extent. In the air, the publicity of civil proceedings may seem imaginary and unnecessary, but the importance of the principles that may be at stake in the absence of public proceedings, and the many fruits of principle, are sufficient to justify the necessity of public hearings. arrives. In terms of enforcement guarantees, non-compliance with the provisions of the principle of openness of proceedings can be considered as a disciplinary violation of judges. If it is appealed or appealed in the appeal stage, it will cause a violation of the vote in higher authorities. In Iranian law, the legislator's silence on the principle of openness in civil proceedings and the guarantee of its implementation cast doubt on the acceptance of this idea, although the solution adopted in French law seems desirable.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6088_d7a9878d2509c70bf039ddd11ca4668a.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.29573.3929]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Legal status of the San Remo Directive from the perspective of public international law]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[seify, behzad]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Custom]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Naval Warfare]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[San Remo Guidelines]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Soft Law]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[SanRemo Manual, although not a binding document, seeks to provide a contemporary revision of applicable international law on armed conflict at sea. In order to prevent the previous rules from being forgotten and to create different interpretations of these rules, the mentioned directive has tried to revise the rules of naval war law in accordance with the developments of international law. However, the legal status of the SanRemo Manual in international law and its validity among jurists and governments is unclear and there are differences. Purpose of this brief is to assess the validity of the SanRemo Manual from the perspective of customary international law and soft law. Therefore, considering the content of the instruction and considering that instruction has been compiled by legal and naval experts, the author seeks to answer these questions: if SanRemo Manual is considered to be the source of the law of naval armed conflict, in which category does the resources fall, soft law or customary international law? Findings of the study indicate that the content of SanRemo instruction, Addition to having the validity of customary law in the traditional sectors, also has the validity of soft law in the fields that are innovative in the field of naval law. In recent years, SanRemo directive has also been widely cited by countries and international institutions.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6095_da69aba855fd16894d25ec344a87c4aa.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2021.37478.3936]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Claiming the Damages of Non-Performance of Obligations following the Termination of the Contract]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[shahabi, ali]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Safaii, Seyyed Hossein]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Akhlaghi, Behrooz]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Amini, Mansour]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Damages]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Termination]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Automatic Termination]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The efficiency is, undoubtedly, the one of most importance in the contractual liability systems which, at least in terms of theoretical view, depends on various elements. Despite the types of breach of obligations and the essentials for the institution of contractual liability, the focus of this article is on the institution of damages while the damages resulting from non-performance of contracts are contemplated not the damages in lieu of delayed or partial performances. In Iranian legal system, same as the English system and the international legal instruments, a solution shall also be quested for the possibility of claiming the entire damages resulted by the breach and supporting the Full Compensation Rule. Having done so, the notion which was attempted to be expounded in this article deals with separation of the consequences of termination, as a remedy for breach, from those of damages or claiming the damages ensuing the termination so as the concept of damages in Iranian doctrine be expanded.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6089_2cc40683ddc917bd701369d93f31d87a.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.36029.3743]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Feasibility of Proving punishment for attributing adultery to someone through the hearsay evidence Pass (Study of the Iranian Legal System, , Shi'a and Sunni Jurisprudence)]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[farahzadi, aliakbar]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[mirdadashi, seyed mahdi]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[keshavarz, ali]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[soltanian nejad, ehsan]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[discretionary punishment awarded by judge]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[punishment for attributing adultery to someone]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[right of people]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[divine right]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[hearsay evidence]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The appearance of the legislator's speech in Article 189 of the Islamic Penal Code regarding the non-proof of punishment for attributing adultery to someone with secondary testimony (hearsay evidence) is in conflict with the basis mentioned in Article 255 of the Islamic Penal Code and has created suspicion of non-proof of punishment for attributing adultery to someone with secondary testimony. This is while the fundamental conflict between the mentioned laws and the absoluteness of Article 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure along with what is Shiite and Sunni jurisprudence, including the necessity of proving claims, preventing the closure of rulings, preferring the aspect of human rights and also, the similarity of the appearance of Article 231 with Article 153 of the former Penal Code has been precaution in a descriptive-analytical manner. The approach of jurisprudential and legal principles leads us to the effect of hearsay evidence and proving punishment for attributing adultery to someone with it along with extinguishing the prescribed punishment, which is the preferred theory of this research. Therefore, amendment of Articles 255 and 189 BC is proposed.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6097_f9b955eabd89fc9704fba917c7490e5e.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.38365.4053]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[The Necessity of  Drafting an International Convention on Cyber Attacks]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[farshasaid, parviz]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Jalali, Mahmood]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Goodarzi, Mahnaz]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[: Cyberspace]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[International convention]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[International law.Cyber powers]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[With the advent of computers and the Internet, a new age has begun in human history.Several attacks in cyberspace committed by numerous actors, in various ways, from governments to non-state actors and agents, have threatened international order and security. The question posed in this paper is why governments should develop an international convention on cyber attacksSince international law Due to the specific feature of cyberspace, can not fully cover this area, An international convention specifically on cyberspace, with the participation of all states, should be drafted with clear and binding rules as well as a mechanism for updating the Convention in the light of the advancement of cyber-science in order to prevent the abuse of the actors in this area, as well as It will strengthen deterrence on the international scene. Although because of Cyber power interests in cyberspace, it seem unlikely they are willing to formulate and accept such a treaty, but necessity for keeping international peace and security justifies acceptance of an International Cyber treaty by them.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6093_23708605ea520b36eb77412f9d24e705.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2021.33031.3370]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Foundations of Supportive Criminality In The Law on the Implementation of General Principles of Article 44 of the Constitution]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Mahraa, Nasrin]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[mahmoudiyan, kamran]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Ebrahimi, Omid]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Disruptional Competition]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Protectional Criminalization]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Competition law]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Article-44 Law]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[The basis of criminalization]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[with the adoption of Chapter 9 of the law on the implementation of general principles of principle 44 of the constitution, it seems the legislature has increasingly sought to support market participants and support new values and norms by using the tools of criminalization and influenced by dual principles of “loss" and "legal morality". the present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the bases of criminologies carried out in the above law in a descriptive-analytical manner and it seeks to answer the question, what are the principles supported by the legislator in criminalizing acts and procedures that are harmful to competition in the law? the results indicate this protectional criminalization is based on various principles such as guaranteeing fair trial, protecting the commercial and professional reputation of persons and protecting their informational privacy. despite the legislator's primary effort in carrying out the supportive duty, this mission has been carried out in a vague and imperfect manner that, in addition to interfering with other similar criminal offenses, has the potential to violate the legislature and restrict the rights of individuals. in addition, in economic activities, the mere use of criminal means, if necessary, was not sufficient and will not be able to overcome structural problems such as lack of operational transparency in various economic sectors of the country singly.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6090_1931a5d0d41ca8b009e83e7ed0b94afc.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.33519.3440]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>
<ags:resource>
					<dc:title><![CDATA[Competence of concurrent prehension securement of baseless lawsuits and securement of foreigners in Iranian law and with a look to judicial procedure]]></dc:title>
					<dc:creator>
					<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Nezamolmolki, Jafar]]></ags:creatorPersonal>
<ags:creatorPersonal><![CDATA[Jahanshahloo, Massoumeh]]></ags:creatorPersonal>

			</dc:creator>
			<dc:publisher>
				<ags:publisherName><![CDATA[Shiraz University]]></ags:publisherName>
			</dc:publisher>
			<dc:date><dcterms:dateIssued><![CDATA[2021]]></dcterms:dateIssued></dc:date>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[the principle of proportion]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[Iranian defendant]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[foreigner plaintiff]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[baseless lawsuits]]></dc:subject>
				<dc:subject><![CDATA[securement of foreigners]]></dc:subject>
			<dc:description>
				<ags:descriptionNotes><![CDATA[Includes references]]></ags:descriptionNotes>
				<dcterms:abstract><![CDATA[The legal entity for securement of baseless lawsuits and securement of foreigners Is recognition and foreseen in articles 109and 144 of the code of civil procedure, respectively. Scrutinizing in the contents of these articles indicates that while the conditions of each one of these two securement are the same in cases, but generally, these two types of legal entity should be considered distinct and different from each other. herein, in cases where plaintiff claimant is foreigners, and we are confront with the apparent conflict of these two types of securement, the main question is whether the Iranian defendant can apply the issuance of both types securement of foreigners and securement of baseless lawsuits from the court or no? Will only be able to request one of securements? The results of the present research show that in the supposition that the defendant is foreign and lawsuit is baseless,Issuance of securement of agreement of foreigners which in one side also secured the interest slightly in securement of baseless lawsuits and of the other side through the court obligation to issuance it to spend question defendant is preferred: Except in cases where we confront with common exemptions or specific to these two types of securement that basically issuance of either of these two will be rejected and eliminated here.]]></dcterms:abstract>
			</dc:description>
            <dc:identifier scheme="dcterms:URI"><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_6092_79f938136474afdff113d3115230d54c.pdf]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:identifier scheme="ags:DOI"><![CDATA[10.22099/jls.2020.34924.3617]]></dc:identifier>
			<dc:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dc:type>
			<dc:format><dcterms:medium><![CDATA[text]]></dcterms:medium></dc:format>
			<dc:language><![CDATA[فارسی]]></dc:language>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[https://jls.shirazu.ac.ir/]]></dc:source>
			<dc:source><![CDATA[Journal of Legal Studies]]></dc:source>
		</ags:resource>

</ags:resources>