الف) فارسی
امینی، منصور و ابراهیمی، عیسی (1390)، «حسن نیت در قراردادها، از نظریه تا عمل، نگاهی به موضوع در نظام حقوقی کامن لو»، مجله حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 2، شماره 2، صص23-43.
پاسبان، محمدرضا (1395)، حقوق شرکتهای تجاری، ویراست دوم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
ستوده تهرانی، حسن (1396)، حقوق تجارت، ج دوم، تهران: انتشارات دادگستر.
عرفانی، محمود (1387)، حقوق تجارت، ج دوم (شرکتهای تجاری)، تهران: انتشارات جنگل.
نوری یوشانلویی، جعفر و جوهر، سعید (1393)، «مفهوم شناسی مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتهای تجاری در حقوق آلمان، فرانسه، انگلستان و ایران با رویکرد تطبیقی»، مجله حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 5، شماره 2، صص 603-627.
ب) انگلیسی
American Law Institute publications, (1994), Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations, American Law institute publications, Philadelphia.
American Law Institute, (2016) Model Business Corporations Act., American Law institute, Philadelphia,
Arrow, Kenneth. J. (1974), The Limits of Organization, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Avi-Yonah, Rueven. S. (2005) »The cyclical transformations of the corporate form: a historical perspective on corporate social responsibility«. Del. J. Corp. l. 30, pp.767-818.
Bainbridge Stephan. M. (2002) »Why a Board? Group Decision-making in Corporate Governance« 55-VAND. L. REV., pp.1-57.
Bainbridge, Stephen M. (2004). »The Business Judgement Rule as Abstention Doctrine,« 57 Vand. L. Rev. pp.83-131
Bainbridge, Stephen M., (2003), .»Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance«, 97 NW. U. L. REV. pp.547-607.
Bainbridge. Stephen. M. (2008), The New Corporate Governance in Theory and Practice, Oxford University Press. Oxford.
Bhagat, Sanjai. & Black, Bernard. (2000), »Board Independence and Long-Term Performance« (working paper), J Corp L, 1, 27, pp.231-275
Black, Bernard. S. (1989). »Is corporate law trivial: A political and economic analysis.« Nw. UL Rev., 84, pp.542-598.
Black, Bernard. S. (2001) »The Principal Fiduciary Duties of Boards of Directors«. Asia Bus. L. Rev., 33, pp.3-16
Davis, Kenneth B., Jr. (1988), »Discretion of corporate managers to do good Expense of Shareholder Gain-A Survey of, and Commentary on, the U.S. Corporate Law«, Canada-United states law journal. Vol. 13, pp. 7-77.
Dewey, John. (1926). “The historic background of corporate legal personality”. TheYalelawjournal, 35(6), pp. 655-673.
Dooley, Michael. P., (1992) »Two Models of Corporate Governance«, 47, Bus. Law, pp.461-529.
Easterbrook, Frank. H, Fischel, Daniel R, (1991), The Economic Structure of Corporate law, Cambridge, Harvard University press,
Elhauge, Einer. (2005) »Sacrificing Corporate Profits in the Public Interest«, 80 N.Y.U. L. REV., pp.733- 807.
Elson, Charles. M. (2017) »Why Delaware Must Retain its Corporate Dominance and Why it May Not«, Delaware, UniversityofDelaware - JohnL. WeinbergCenterforCorporateGovernance, pp.1-20.
Fama, Eugene, & Jensen, Michael. (1983). »Separation of Ownership and Control«. The Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2), pp.301-325.
Franks, Julian. R., & Mayer, Colin. (2017). »Evolution of Ownership and Control Around the World: The Changing Face of Capitalism«. European Corporate Governance Institute, Finance working paper No.503/2017.
Gold, Andrew. S. A, (2007), »Decision Theory Approach ToThe Business Judgment Rule: Reflections on Disney, Good Faith, And Judicial Uncertainty«, Maryland Law review, Vol. 66, pp.398-474.
Gourvish, Terence. R., (1987), »British Business and the Transition to a Corporate Economy: Entrepreneurship and Management Structures«, 39(4) Business History, pp.18-45.
Grossman, Adelle, (2007).»Director Compliance with Elusive Fiduciary Duties in a Climate of Corporate Governance Reform«, FORDHAM J. CORP. & FIN. L. 12, pp.393-466.
Kirby, Maurice.W., (1996), »The Corporate Economy in Britain: Its Rise and Achievements Since 1900«, in Maurice W. Kirby and Mary B. Rose (eds), Business Enterprise in Modern Britain: From the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century «The Journal of Economic History, vol. 56, issue 04, pp.139-171.
Korn/ Ferry International, (2000), 27th Annual Board of Directors Study, pp.33-34
Lawrence A. Cunningham, (1999), »Commonalities and Prescriptions in the Vertical Dimension of Global Corporate Governance«, 84 CORNELL L. REV, pp.1133- 1183
Lewis S. Black, JR., (2007), Why Corporations Choose Delaware, Delaware, Del Dept. Of State Div. Of Corp., pp.1-23
Lowenstein, Roger. (2004), Origins of the crash: The great bubble and its undoing, London, Penguin.
Maubossin, Michael. J, (2011), »What Shareholders Value is Really About?«, 22, Harvard Business Review, pp.51-57
Means, Gardiner. C. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: MacMillan.
Melvin, Aron Eisenberg, (1993), »The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law«, 62 FORDHAM L. REV.pp. 437-468
Millon, David, (1990). »Theories of the Corporation«. DukeLawJournal, pp. 201-262.
Mitchell, Sali.Tsuk, »Shareholders as Proxies: The Contours of Shareholder Democracy«, 63WASH. & LEE L. REV., pp.1503-1578.
National Association of Corporation Directors of the NACD, (1995), also (1996), Blue ribbon commission on director’s compensation, purpose, principles and best practices.
Pitelis, Christos. N., & Sugden, R. (1986). »The separation of ownership and control in the theory of the firm: a reappraisal«. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 4(1), pp. 69-86;
Rhee, Robert. J. (2009), »Fiduciary exemption for public necessity: Shareholder profit, public good, and the Hobson's choice during a national crisis.« 17, Geo. Mason L. Rev. pp.661-736.
Rosenberg, David. (2007), »Galactic Stupidity and the Business Judgment Rule« Journal of Corporation Law, Iowa City 32.2, pp.301-322.
Sharfman, Bernard. S. (2014), »Shareholder wealth maximization and its implementation under corporate law«. Fla. L. Rev. 66, pp.389-431.
Smith, Adam, (1776), WealthofNations, 5th edn, Book V, ch.1, New York, (Edwin Cannan, ed.1904, originally published.
Smith, D. Gordon, (2015), The Modern Business Judgment Rule, Research Handbook On Mergers And Acquisitions, Forthcoming. Boston, BYU Law Research Paper Series. No.15-09.
Smith, Terry, (2015), »What Exactly Do We Mean by Shareholders Value? Financial Times, January«, pp.6-8
Spencer, Herbert, »Railway Morals and Railway Policy«, (1854), 100 Edinburg Review, , pp. 420-461,
Sprague, Robert, & Lyttle, Aaron. J. (2010), »Shareholder primacy and the business judgment rule: Arguments for expanded corporate democracy. « 16, 1, Stan. JL Bus. & Fin., pp.1-26.
Thompson, Robert. B., & Thomas, R. S., (2004), »The new look of shareholder litigation: acquisition-oriented class actions. «57, Vand. L. Rev,, pp.133-211.
Cases
Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del. 1984).
BNS Inc. v. Koppers Co., 683 F. Supp. 473, 74 (D. Del. 1988).In re Citigroup Inc. S'holder Derivative Litig., 964 A.2d 124 (Del. Ch. 2009.
Bodell v. Gen. Gas &Elec. Corp., 140 A. 264, 267 (Del. 1927)
Brehm v. Eisner. 746. A2d, 262-64 (Del2000).
Casey v. Woodruff, 49 N.Y.S.2d 625, 643 (N.Y. Sp. Term 1944).
Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., 634 A.2d 345 (Del. 1993)
Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC, 125 A. 3d 304, 313-14 (Del. 2015),
Cuker v. Mikalauskas, 547 Pa. 600, 692 A.2d 1042 (1997).
Disney II, 746 A.2d 244, 256 (Del. 2000) (en banc)
Disney IV, 907 A.2d 693, 699–745 (Del. Ch. 2005).
Dodge V. Ford Motors Co, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919);
Emerald Partners v. Berlin, No. Civ. A. 9700, 2001 WL 115340, at *25 n.63 (Del. Ch. Feb. 7, 2001).
In re Dow Chemical Company Derivative Litigation, No. 4349, 2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS, at *2 (Del. Ch. Jan. 11, 2010).
In re RJR Nabisco, Inc. S’holders Litig. Civ. A. No. 10389, 1989 WL 7036, at *13 n.13 (Del. Ch. Jan. 31, 1989).
Lyondell, 970 A.2d at 243.
Marony v. Applegate. 266 A.D. 412, 422, (N.Y. App. Div. 1943)
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Integrated Health Services, Inc. v. Elkins. No. Civ. A. 20228-NC, 2004 WL 1949290 (Del. Ch. Aug. 24, 2004). n. 92.
Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc., 571 A.2d 1140 (Del. 1989).
Percy v. Millaudon, 8. Mart. (n.s.) 68 (La. 1829).
Perrine v. Pennroad Corp., 487-8 A.2d 479 (Del. 1946)
Robinson v. Pittsburgh Oil Refining Corp., 126 A. 46 (Del. Ch. 1924).
Selheimer v. Manganese Corp., Spering’s Appeal, 71 Pa. 11, 20 (1872).
Shlensky v. Wrigley. 237 N.E.2d 776 (Ill. App. 1968)
Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) (en banc).
Spering’s Appeal, 71 Pa. at 24.
Stone v Ritter, No. 93, 2006 WL 3169168 (Del. Nov. 6, 2006).
The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation, Disney II, 746 A.2d 244, 264 (Del. 2000)
Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (Del. 1985
)