عنوان مقاله [English]
Stolen property is necessity to rejected, but the debate topic between the scholars is about wasted or damaged stolen. Some says responsibility is as the richness of the thief, and others haven’t been difference between of his poverty and richness. But a group deemed to the lack of responsibility in case of execution of Hadd of fall.
Unfortunately, this topic is less considered by books and articles, mostly the generalities of this crime and especially its judgment and less is studied comparably for the details. Therefore, this study examines different perspectives for their documentation, and with the attention and use of narratives to Quran, says this topic is not correct about the lack of responsibility of a thief stolen wealth and poverty in the form of waste he (the thief) is. The aim of this study is to answer the question: with the implementation of the Hadd, do the task of the thief returning the stolen property, be deleted or not? The method of describing and analyzing and matching.